| % | Per 90 | Metric | Per 90 | % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
24.49%
|
1.14 | Expected Goals (xG) | 1.21 |
30.61%
|
||||||
|
60.2%
|
38.34 | Challenges won, % | 37.66 |
38.78%
|
||||||
|
83.67%
|
40.58 | Team pressing | 35.13 |
53.06%
|
||||||
|
23.47%
|
100.47 | Ball possessions, % | 98.87 |
13.27%
|
||||||
|
40.82%
|
0.48 | Passes average length | 0.51 |
75.51%
|
Joachim Andersen
Is Crystal Palace better than Nottingham Forrest?
Currently Crystal Palace has a better 1vs1 performance index with 88. Crystal Palace has 40 goals and Nottingham Forrest has a total of 38 goals. Our opinion is that currently Crystal Palace would win the match.
Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forrest - who has the better defense?
Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forrest - who has the better midfield?
Evaluating the strength of a teams midfield is not easy. At 1vs1 we look at a value called Pass Progression Value (PPV). We measure the ability of players to play the pass into dangerous zones and to create chances. Nottingham Forrest has a PPV value of 0.21 and Crystal Palace has a value of 0.19. Within the team of Nottingham Forrest Serge Aurier has a total value of 0.72 and in the team of Crystal Palace the best player is Albert Sambi Sambi Lokonga.
Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forrest - who has the better attackers?
Summary
Based on all statistical information we believe that currently Crystal Palace is the better team. Please feel free to discuss with us – the comment box is below. We will be happy to reply.
