Manchester City: Team & Player Stats
Last Matches
Next Match Prediction
Trending Manchester City Team Stats
Manchester City has a defensive stability rating of 685.3, earning 8 spot in the league for defensive stability. See Full Defensive stability Ranking
Manchester City scores from 40.97 expected goals in open play, ranking 2 in the league for open play xG. See Full Open play Xg Ranking
Manchester City has made 50.07% successful tackles, placing them 11 in the league for tackle success rate. See Full Tackles lost % Ranking
Best Players by Stat Category
#1
Erling Haaland
20
No.
Player
Value
#1
Erling Haaland
20
#2
Phil Foden
6
#3
Tijjani Reijnders
5
#4
Rayan Cherki
3
#5
Ruben Dias
2
#6
Josko Gvardiol
2
#7
Antoine Semenyo
2
#8
Nico OReilly
1
#9
Jeremy Doku
1
#10
Nico Gonzalez
1
#11
Oscar Bobb
1
#12
Omar Marmoush
1
#13
Matheus Nunes
1
#14
Rico Lewis
0
#15
Abdukodir Khusanov
0
#16
John Stones
0
#17
Rayan Ait-Nouri
0
#18
James Trafford
0
#19
Bernardo Silva
0
#20
Nathan Ake
0
#21
Rodri
0
#22
Gianluigi Donnarumma
0
#23
Savinho
0
#24
Mateo Kovacic
0
#25
Divine Mukasa
0
#26
Max Alleyne
0
#27
Marc Guehi
0
#1
Rayan Cherki
8
No.
Player
Value
#1
Rayan Cherki
8
#2
Jeremy Doku
6
#3
Erling Haaland
5
#4
Matheus Nunes
5
#5
Bernardo Silva
4
#6
Nico OReilly
3
#7
Tijjani Reijnders
3
#8
Phil Foden
2
#9
Josko Gvardiol
2
#10
Savinho
2
#11
Rico Lewis
1
#12
Oscar Bobb
1
#13
Omar Marmoush
1
#14
Abdukodir Khusanov
0
#15
John Stones
0
#16
Rayan Ait-Nouri
0
#17
Nico Gonzalez
0
#18
James Trafford
0
#19
Ruben Dias
0
#20
Nathan Ake
0
#21
Rodri
0
#22
Gianluigi Donnarumma
0
#23
Mateo Kovacic
0
#24
Divine Mukasa
0
#25
Max Alleyne
0
#26
Antoine Semenyo
0
#27
Marc Guehi
0
#1
Erling Haaland
66
No.
Player
Value
#1
Erling Haaland
66
#2
Tijjani Reijnders
26
#3
Phil Foden
23
#4
Jeremy Doku
19
#5
Nico Gonzalez
12
#6
Rayan Cherki
12
#7
Josko Gvardiol
9
#8
Omar Marmoush
8
#9
Ruben Dias
8
#10
Savinho
7
#11
Matheus Nunes
5
#12
Nico OReilly
4
#13
Oscar Bobb
4
#14
Antoine Semenyo
4
#15
Bernardo Silva
3
#16
Nathan Ake
3
#17
Marc Guehi
3
#18
Max Alleyne
2
#19
Rodri
1
#20
Divine Mukasa
1
#21
Rico Lewis
0
#22
Abdukodir Khusanov
0
#23
John Stones
0
#24
Rayan Ait-Nouri
0
#25
James Trafford
0
#26
Gianluigi Donnarumma
0
#27
Mateo Kovacic
0
#1
Jeremy Doku
113
#2
Matheus Nunes
102
#3
Nico OReilly
85
#4
Nico Gonzalez
81
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jeremy Doku
113
#2
Matheus Nunes
102
#3
Nico OReilly
85
#4
Nico Gonzalez
81
#5
Josko Gvardiol
77
#6
Rayan Cherki
73
#7
Bernardo Silva
70
#8
Ruben Dias
56
#9
Tijjani Reijnders
54
#10
Phil Foden
53
#11
Savinho
37
#12
Oscar Bobb
30
#13
Rodri
28
#14
Abdukodir Khusanov
23
#15
Rico Lewis
20
#16
Erling Haaland
17
#17
Nathan Ake
13
#18
Gianluigi Donnarumma
11
#19
Max Alleyne
11
#20
John Stones
10
#21
Rayan Ait-Nouri
8
#22
Omar Marmoush
8
#23
Antoine Semenyo
8
#24
Marc Guehi
7
#25
James Trafford
4
#26
Mateo Kovacic
2
#27
Divine Mukasa
1
Scores
Team`s Recent Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All Manchester City`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Strengths & Weaknesses | Value |
|---|---|
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
Manchester City completes 195 diagonal passes across the pitch while losing possession through 76 failed diagonal attempts - revealing their ambition in switching play
Manchester City records 1174 offensive actions from central areas compared to 1043 from the left wing - highlighting their tactical preferences
Manchester City manages 108 ball recoveries in the opponent's penalty area but suffers 143 possession losses in the same zone - showcasing their high-risk approach
Advanced Stats & Analytics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals | 49 |
| Passing accuracy % | 85.26 |
| Goals conceeded | 23 |
| Tackles | 1500 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 343 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 43.71 |
Compare Yourself
Compare Erling Haaland
Other Teams
Other Team Head-to-Head Comparisons
News
The xG Crisis Threatening Arsenal's Title Dreams
There's a shocking crisis in Arsenal's title challenge that nobody wants to admit. While the defense shines, the finishing is woefully lacking—what you don’t know about their forwards might haunt their trophy dreams. If they don’t convert soon, the Gunners could make history for all the wrong reasons.
The Creative Engine Duel: Manchester City's Passing Masterclass vs Leeds United's Desperate Fight for Goals
Manchester City have created 88 chances this season while Leeds sit at just 81, but here's the shocking twist: City are expected to win by a crushing 76% probability tomorrow. Can Leeds' scrappy determination overcome City's slick passing machine, or will this turn into another masterclass from Pep's boys?
The Premier League's Streak Kings: Why Arsenal and Liverpool Are Unstoppable While Wolves Can't Stop Losing
Arsenal and Liverpool have both won 5 straight games - but one team has lost 11 in a row. Our Simulations reveals the shocking truth about who's really winning and losing the longest streaks in Premier League history this season.
Premier League
Manchester City’s Total Squad Salary
Performance vs. Salary
#1
Rico Lewis
0
#2
Nico OReilly
0
#3
Abdukodir Khusanov
0
#4
John Stones
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Rico Lewis
0
#2
Nico OReilly
0
#3
Abdukodir Khusanov
0
#4
John Stones
0
#5
Rayan Ait-Nouri
0
#6
Nico Gonzalez
0
#7
James Trafford
0
#8
Bernardo Silva
0
#9
Nathan Ake
0
#10
Rodri
0
#11
Gianluigi Donnarumma
0
#12
Savinho
0
#13
Mateo Kovacic
0
#14
Divine Mukasa
0
#15
Max Alleyne
0
#16
Marc Guehi
0
#17
Omar Marmoush
0
#18
Matheus Nunes
0
#19
Ruben Dias
0
#20
Josko Gvardiol
0
#21
Rayan Cherki
0
#22
Jeremy Doku
0
#23
Oscar Bobb
0
#24
Tijjani Reijnders
0
#25
Phil Foden
0
#26
Antoine Semenyo
0
#27
Erling Haaland
1
#1
Nico OReilly
0
#2
Rayan Ait-Nouri
0
#3
Nico Gonzalez
0
#4
James Trafford
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Nico OReilly
0
#2
Rayan Ait-Nouri
0
#3
Nico Gonzalez
0
#4
James Trafford
0
#5
Savinho
0
#6
Mateo Kovacic
0
#7
Divine Mukasa
0
#8
Max Alleyne
0
#9
Omar Marmoush
1
#10
Marc Guehi
1
#11
Erling Haaland
1
#12
John Stones
1
#13
Antoine Semenyo
1
#14
Rodri
1
#15
Josko Gvardiol
1
#16
Ruben Dias
1
#17
Gianluigi Donnarumma
1
#18
Bernardo Silva
1
#19
Nathan Ake
1
#20
Phil Foden
2
#21
Tijjani Reijnders
2
#22
Rayan Cherki
2
#23
Matheus Nunes
2
#24
Oscar Bobb
3
#25
Rico Lewis
5
#26
Jeremy Doku
7
#27
Abdukodir Khusanov
8
#1
Nico OReilly
0
#2
Rayan Ait-Nouri
0
#3
Nico Gonzalez
0
#4
James Trafford
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Nico OReilly
0
#2
Rayan Ait-Nouri
0
#3
Nico Gonzalez
0
#4
James Trafford
0
#5
Savinho
0
#6
Divine Mukasa
0
#7
Max Alleyne
0
#8
Mateo Kovacic
0
#9
Gianluigi Donnarumma
0
#10
John Stones
0
#11
Omar Marmoush
1
#12
Erling Haaland
1
#13
Marc Guehi
2
#14
Nathan Ake
4
#15
Antoine Semenyo
5
#16
Ruben Dias
6
#17
Rodri
6
#18
Josko Gvardiol
6
#19
Tijjani Reijnders
7
#20
Phil Foden
8
#21
Bernardo Silva
8
#22
Rayan Cherki
14
#23
Rico Lewis
17
#24
Matheus Nunes
21
#25
Oscar Bobb
22
#26
Abdukodir Khusanov
29
#27
Jeremy Doku
63
#1
Erling Haaland
0.63
#2
Jeremy Doku
0.55
#3
Tijjani Reijnders
0.3
#4
Oscar Bobb
0.27
No.
Player
Value
#1
Erling Haaland
1
#2
Jeremy Doku
1
#3
Tijjani Reijnders
0
#4
Oscar Bobb
0
#5
Phil Foden
0
#6
Marc Guehi
0
#7
Antoine Semenyo
0
#8
Rayan Cherki
0
#9
Josko Gvardiol
0
#10
Omar Marmoush
0
#11
Rico Lewis
0
#12
Matheus Nunes
0
#13
Bernardo Silva
0
#14
Ruben Dias
0
#15
Nathan Ake
0
#16
Rodri
0
#17
Nico OReilly
0
#18
Abdukodir Khusanov
0
#19
John Stones
0
#20
Rayan Ait-Nouri
0
#21
Nico Gonzalez
0
#22
James Trafford
0
#23
Gianluigi Donnarumma
0
#24
Savinho
0
#25
Mateo Kovacic
0
#26
Divine Mukasa
0
#27
Max Alleyne
0
Manchester City: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where Manchester City is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
#1
Manchester City
5002
#2
Liverpool FC
4652
#3
Chelsea
4614
#4
Newcastle United
4486
No.
Player
Value
#1
Manchester City
5002
#2
Liverpool FC
4652
#3
Chelsea
4614
#4
Newcastle United
4486
#5
Manchester United
4456
#6
Brighton and Hove Albion
4336
#7
Fulham
4177
#8
Arsenal FC
4168
#9
Aston Villa
4153
#10
Tottenham Hotspur
4036
#11
Nottingham Forrest
3966
#12
Leeds United
3924
#13
AFC Bournemouth
3892
#14
Wolverhampton Wanderers
3746
#15
Brentford
3715
#16
Crystal Palace
3673
#17
West Ham United
3654
#18
FC Burnley
3651
#19
AFC Sunderland
3623
#20
Everton FC
3585
#1
Manchester City
3802
#2
Liverpool FC
3656
#3
Newcastle United
3636
#4
Chelsea
3606
No.
Player
Value
#1
Manchester City
3802
#2
Liverpool FC
3656
#3
Newcastle United
3636
#4
Chelsea
3606
#5
Manchester United
3558
#6
Brighton and Hove Albion
3381
#7
Fulham
3337
#8
Aston Villa
3270
#9
Arsenal FC
3143
#10
Tottenham Hotspur
3094
#11
Nottingham Forrest
3032
#12
Leeds United
3008
#13
AFC Bournemouth
2928
#14
Crystal Palace
2926
#15
FC Burnley
2920
#16
Brentford
2895
#17
Wolverhampton Wanderers
2853
#18
West Ham United
2817
#19
AFC Sunderland
2769
#20
Everton FC
2758
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Manchester City consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#2
Manchester City
43
No.
Player
Value
#2
Manchester City
43
#3
Manchester United
40
#4
Chelsea
38
#5
Liverpool FC
34
#6
Aston Villa
32
#7
AFC Bournemouth
31
#8
Fulham
31
#9
Tottenham Hotspur
30
#10
Brentford
30
#11
Brighton and Hove Albion
30
#12
Leeds United
27
#13
AFC Sunderland
26
#14
West Ham United
26
#15
Newcastle United
26
#16
Everton FC
24
#17
Crystal Palace
23
#18
FC Burnley
22
#19
Nottingham Forrest
22
#20
Wolverhampton Wanderers
14
#2
Manchester City
1046
#3
Chelsea
1030
#4
Leeds United
997
#5
Aston Villa
996
No.
Player
Value
#2
Manchester City
1046
#3
Chelsea
1030
#4
Leeds United
997
#5
Aston Villa
996
#6
Tottenham Hotspur
976
#7
Newcastle United
955
#8
Crystal Palace
954
#9
Wolverhampton Wanderers
948
#10
Brighton and Hove Albion
946
#11
Manchester United
915
#12
AFC Sunderland
911
#13
Nottingham Forrest
902
#14
Liverpool FC
895
#15
Brentford
895
#16
FC Burnley
886
#17
West Ham United
865
#18
AFC Bournemouth
818
#19
Arsenal FC
808
#20
Everton FC
785
Average Stats
These stats show Manchester City`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#4
Manchester City
343
No.
Player
Value
#4
Manchester City
343
#5
AFC Bournemouth
343
#6
Chelsea
329
#7
Newcastle United
323
#8
Brighton and Hove Albion
323
#9
Aston Villa
310
#10
Leeds United
300
#11
Nottingham Forrest
289
#12
Crystal Palace
279
#13
Fulham
273
#14
Tottenham Hotspur
269
#15
West Ham United
256
#16
Brentford
249
#17
AFC Sunderland
246
#18
Everton FC
245
#19
Wolverhampton Wanderers
229
#20
FC Burnley
214
#4
Manchester City
347
#5
West Ham United
344
#6
Manchester United
336
#7
AFC Bournemouth
333
No.
Player
Value
#4
Manchester City
347
#5
West Ham United
344
#6
Manchester United
336
#7
AFC Bournemouth
333
#8
Tottenham Hotspur
332
#9
Wolverhampton Wanderers
328
#10
Nottingham Forrest
325
#11
Chelsea
323
#12
Arsenal FC
314
#13
Brighton and Hove Albion
284
#14
Brentford
276
#15
FC Burnley
268
#16
Crystal Palace
260
#17
Aston Villa
252
#18
AFC Sunderland
249
#19
Everton FC
242
#20
Leeds United
240
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Manchester City`s performance falls below the league average.
Performance per season
Historical Standings
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
Manchester City has an Expected Threat of 7983.63 - ranking 2 in this metric, basically how well they advance the ball into dangerous positions and create goal-scoring opportunities through progressive play. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
Manchester City has an Expected Threat against of 420.51 - placing them 19 in defensive stability, showing how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents and how well they restrict threatening advances into their own half. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
Manchester City recorded 175 Critical ball losses - ranking 6 in this area, basically how many times they've given the ball away in spots that immediately put them in trouble and expose their defense to counter-attacks. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 7983.63 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 420.51 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 175 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1718 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.93 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare Manchester City`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Comprehensive Stats & Advanced Metrics
Scores Manchester City
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 80.18 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 75.94 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 73.58 |
| Offensive interventions | 123.17 |
Goals & Assists Manchester City
| Goals | 49 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 43 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 3 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 6 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 2 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 0 |
| Goals by foot | 39 |
| Shots on Goal | 233 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 10.38 |
Goals & Shots conceded Manchester City
| Goals conceeded | 23 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 1 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 21 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 168 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 0.96 |
Passing and Ball progression Manchester City
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 5002 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 3802 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 10391 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 195 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 199 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 347 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 42 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 777 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 2141 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 6476 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 2906 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 159 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 2691 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 2065 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 3170 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 2181 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 2352 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1718 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 93.61 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 71.96 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 86.53 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 51.85 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 45.85 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 71.88 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 81.19 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 90.17 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 85.19 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 52.65 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 82.09 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 87.34 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 85.19 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 86.51 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 85.62 |
Ball contacts & phases of play Manchester City
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 9798 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1824 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 481 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 863 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 1045 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 769 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 562 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 603 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 1043 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 1466 |
Ball losses Manchester City
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 175 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 709 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 76 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 235 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 403 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 54 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 39 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 304 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 496 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 706 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 505 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 143 |
| Ball losses total | 2154 |
Ball regains Manchester City
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 2956 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 228 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 712 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 1054 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 436 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 108 |
Defensive Manchester City
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 749 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 751 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 271 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 204 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 637 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 340 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 648 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 371 |
| Tackles | 1500 |
| Clearances by foot | 463 |
| Ground duels total | 1500 |
| Ground duels won % | 49.93 |
| Ground duels lost % | 50.07 |
| Ariel duels total | 475 |
| Ariel duels won % | 57.05 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 42.95 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 685.3 |
Dribbles Manchester City
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 1040 |
| Succesful dribbles | 10429 |
Elimination actions & Pitch Manchester City
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 436 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 1046 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 2265 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 1019 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 743 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 2267 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 1280 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 438 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 1069 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 761 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 1174 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 808 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 1043 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 624 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1829 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 940 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 307 |
xG Manchester City
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 43.71 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 43.71 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 1.2 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 6.53 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 2.34 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.93 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 40.97 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 2.74 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.13 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 34.44 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 3.29 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.53 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 41.37 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.4 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 1.8 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.66 |
Comments (0)