% | Per 90 | Metric | Per 90 | % | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.53%
|
1.17 | Expected Goals (xG) | 1.09 |
10.2%
|
||||||
83.67%
|
51 | Challenges won, % | 51 |
84.69%
|
||||||
42.86%
|
17.57 | Team pressing | 17.78 |
33.67%
|
||||||
62.24%
|
50 | Ball possessions, % | 41 |
2.04%
|
||||||
84.69%
|
18.99 | Passes average length | 20.22 |
94.9%
|
Wolverhampton Wanderers has a small advantage – but a very close match lies ahead. Nevertheless our prediction is that Wolverhampton Wanderers will win.
Ruben Diogo Neves
Is Wolverhampton Wanderers better than Nottingham Forrest?
Currently Wolverhampton Wanderers has a better 1vs1 performance index with 87. Wolverhampton Wanderers has 22 goals and Nottingham Forrest has a total of 22 goals. Our opinion is that currently Wolverhampton Wanderers would win the match.
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Nottingham Forrest - who has the better defense?
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Nottingham Forrest - who has the better midfield?
Evaluating the strength of a teams midfield is not easy. At 1vs1 we look at a value called Pass Progression Value (PPV). We measure the ability of players to play the pass into dangerous zones and to create chances. Wolverhampton Wanderers has a PPV value of 0.26 and Nottingham Forrest has a value of 0.21. Within the team of Wolverhampton Wanderers Adama Traore Diarra has a total value of 0.65 and in the team of Nottingham Forrest the best player is Serge Aurier.
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Nottingham Forrest - who has the better attackers?
Summary
Based on all statistical information we believe that currently Wolverhampton Wanderers is the better team. Please feel free to discuss with us – the comment box is below. We will be happy to reply.