VfB Stuttgart vs Rayo Vallecano: Who Wins? Advanced Stats, Prediction & H2H
Who is currently the better team – VfB Stuttgart or Rayo Vallecano? Discover advanced team stats, xG metrics, Expected Threat, full H2H records, pressing & possession profiles, visualised predictions and data-driven performance analytics.
Germany 
Bundesliga 
Spain 
LaLiga 
Analyse Analyse VfB Stuttgart vs. Rayo Vallecano - Who Is Better?
VfB Stuttgart has a 1vs1 Score of 71.52 while Rayo Vallecano has a 1vs1 Score of 65.18, showing which team is performing better this season. View VfB Stuttgart's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking | View Rayo Vallecano's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking
Rayo Vallecano has won 683 ground duels versus 607 for VfB Stuttgart, with Rayo Vallecano ranking 11 and VfB Stuttgart ranking 10 in the league for ground duels won. See Full Ground duels won Ranking
VfB Stuttgart has accumulated 31.76 expected goals against while Rayo Vallecano faces 31.68, with VfB Stuttgart ranking 8 and Rayo Vallecano ranking 9 in the league for xG conceded. See Full Xg total conceeded Ranking
Key Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals  | 38 18 |
| Goals | 1.81 0.82 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 321 273 |
| Shots on Goal | 216 168 |
| Goals conceeded | 27 29 |
| Goals conceeded | 1.29 1.32 |
| Matches won | 12 5 |
| Matches lost | 6 10 |
Scores
To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. Attacking Threat measures a player`s or teams ability to directly impact the game by creating scoring opportunities. It considers actions like dribbling past opponents, winning the ball in dangerous areas, and taking shots on goal. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. Attacking Threat measures a player`s or teams ability to directly impact the game by creating scoring opportunities. It considers actions like dribbling past opponents, winning the ball in dangerous areas, and taking shots on goal. Team Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All VfB Stuttgart`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Team | Strengths & Weaknesses | Team |
|---|---|---|
| STU | RAY | |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
VfB Stuttgart creates 4 clear goal-scoring opportunities compared to Rayo Vallecano's 13 - highlighting their ability to fashion high-quality chances
Rayo Vallecano records 105 shots that miss the target completely versus VfB Stuttgart's 105 - showcasing their shooting accuracy variance
VfB Stuttgart completes 1740 passes from the right flank while Rayo Vallecano manages 1805 - exposing their right-sided distribution patterns
Compare Yourself
VfB Stuttgart Compare VfB Stuttgart
Search for a team Other Comparisons
VfB Stuttgart’s and Rayo Vallecano’s Total Squad Salary
Salary Stats
#1
Alexander Nubel
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Alexander Nubel
0
#2
Luca Jaquez
0
#3
Lazar Jovanovic
0
#4
Jeff Chabot
0
#5
Atakan Karazor
0
#6
Ramon Hendriks
0
#7
Nick Woltemade
0
#8
Finn Jeltsch
0
#9
Chema Andres
0
#10
Nikolas Nartey
0
#11
Lorenz Assignon
0
#12
Badredine Bouanani
0
#13
Ameen Al-Dakhil
0
#14
Pascal Stenzel
0
#15
Dan-Axel Zagadou
0
#16
Jeremy Arevalo
0
#17
Leonidas Stergiou
0
#18
Angelo Stiller
0
#19
Josha Vagnoman
0
#20
Maximilian Mittelstadt
1
#21
Chris Fuhrich
1
#22
Ermedin Demirovic
1
#23
Bilal El Khannouss
1
#24
Jamie Leweling
2
#25
Tiago Tomas
2
#26
Deniz Undav
2
#1
Luca Jaquez
0
#2
Lazar Jovanovic
0
#3
Jeff Chabot
0
#4
Ramon Hendriks
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Luca Jaquez
0
#2
Lazar Jovanovic
0
#3
Jeff Chabot
0
#4
Ramon Hendriks
0
#5
Finn Jeltsch
0
#6
Chema Andres
0
#7
Nikolas Nartey
0
#8
Lorenz Assignon
0
#9
Badredine Bouanani
0
#10
Pascal Stenzel
0
#11
Jeremy Arevalo
0
#12
Leonidas Stergiou
0
#13
Nick Woltemade
0
#14
Dan-Axel Zagadou
1
#15
Ermedin Demirovic
3
#16
Alexander Nubel
3
#17
Deniz Undav
5
#18
Maximilian Mittelstadt
5
#19
Angelo Stiller
6
#20
Ameen Al-Dakhil
6
#21
Chris Fuhrich
8
#22
Jamie Leweling
8
#23
Atakan Karazor
8
#24
Josha Vagnoman
10
#25
Tiago Tomas
10
#26
Bilal El Khannouss
10
#1
Luca Jaquez
0
#2
Lazar Jovanovic
0
#3
Jeff Chabot
0
#4
Ramon Hendriks
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Luca Jaquez
0
#2
Lazar Jovanovic
0
#3
Jeff Chabot
0
#4
Ramon Hendriks
0
#5
Finn Jeltsch
0
#6
Chema Andres
0
#7
Nikolas Nartey
0
#8
Lorenz Assignon
0
#9
Badredine Bouanani
0
#10
Pascal Stenzel
0
#11
Jeremy Arevalo
0
#12
Leonidas Stergiou
0
#13
Nick Woltemade
0
#14
Ermedin Demirovic
2
#15
Alexander Nubel
2
#16
Dan-Axel Zagadou
6
#17
Ameen Al-Dakhil
8
#18
Deniz Undav
10
#19
Tiago Tomas
13
#20
Atakan Karazor
25
#21
Maximilian Mittelstadt
26
#22
Josha Vagnoman
30
#23
Chris Fuhrich
30
#24
Jamie Leweling
37
#25
Angelo Stiller
42
#26
Bilal El Khannouss
56
#1
Tiago Tomas
2.11
#2
Deniz Undav
1.84
#3
Jamie Leweling
0.76
#4
Josha Vagnoman
0.73
No.
Player
Value
#1
Tiago Tomas
2
#2
Deniz Undav
2
#3
Jamie Leweling
1
#4
Josha Vagnoman
1
#5
Bilal El Khannouss
1
#6
Ermedin Demirovic
1
#7
Maximilian Mittelstadt
1
#8
Angelo Stiller
0
#9
Chris Fuhrich
0
#10
Atakan Karazor
0
#11
Dan-Axel Zagadou
0
#12
Ameen Al-Dakhil
0
#13
Nick Woltemade
0
#14
Alexander Nubel
0
#15
Luca Jaquez
0
#16
Lazar Jovanovic
0
#17
Jeff Chabot
0
#18
Ramon Hendriks
0
#19
Finn Jeltsch
0
#20
Chema Andres
0
#21
Nikolas Nartey
0
#22
Lorenz Assignon
0
#23
Badredine Bouanani
0
#24
Pascal Stenzel
0
#25
Jeremy Arevalo
0
#26
Leonidas Stergiou
0
Salary Stats
#1
Pelayo Fernandez
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Pelayo Fernandez
0
#2
Augusto Batalla
0
#3
Alfonso Espino
0
#4
Luiz Felipe
0
#5
Gerard Gumbau
0
#6
Oscar Valentin
0
#7
Pedro Diaz
0
#8
Andrei Ratiu
0
#9
Randy Nteka
0
#10
Pathe Ciss
0
#11
Pep Chavarria
0
#12
Unai Lopez
0
#13
Florian Lejeune
0
#14
Oscar Trejo
0
#15
Sergio Camello
0
#16
Fran Perez
0
#17
Alemao
0
#18
Samu Becerra
0
#19
Jozhua Vertrouwd
0
#20
Ivan Balliu
0
#21
Nobel Mendy
0
#22
Carlos Martin
0
#23
Ilias Akhomach
0
#24
Isi Palazon
1
#25
Alvaro Garcia
1
#26
Jorge de Frutos
4
#1
Pelayo Fernandez
0
#2
Alfonso Espino
0
#3
Luiz Felipe
0
#4
Gerard Gumbau
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Pelayo Fernandez
0
#2
Alfonso Espino
0
#3
Luiz Felipe
0
#4
Gerard Gumbau
0
#5
Randy Nteka
0
#6
Pathe Ciss
0
#7
Pep Chavarria
0
#8
Sergio Camello
0
#9
Fran Perez
0
#10
Alemao
0
#11
Samu Becerra
0
#12
Jozhua Vertrouwd
0
#13
Ivan Balliu
0
#14
Nobel Mendy
0
#15
Carlos Martin
0
#16
Ilias Akhomach
0
#17
Unai Lopez
10
#18
Oscar Trejo
11
#19
Andrei Ratiu
11
#20
Jorge de Frutos
12
#21
Oscar Valentin
12
#22
Isi Palazon
13
#23
Augusto Batalla
14
#24
Alvaro Garcia
14
#25
Florian Lejeune
14
#26
Pedro Diaz
17
#1
Pelayo Fernandez
0
#2
Alfonso Espino
0
#3
Luiz Felipe
0
#4
Gerard Gumbau
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Pelayo Fernandez
0
#2
Alfonso Espino
0
#3
Luiz Felipe
0
#4
Gerard Gumbau
0
#5
Randy Nteka
0
#6
Pathe Ciss
0
#7
Pep Chavarria
0
#8
Sergio Camello
0
#9
Fran Perez
0
#10
Alemao
0
#11
Samu Becerra
0
#12
Jozhua Vertrouwd
0
#13
Ivan Balliu
0
#14
Nobel Mendy
0
#15
Carlos Martin
0
#16
Ilias Akhomach
0
#17
Oscar Trejo
11
#18
Augusto Batalla
21
#19
Oscar Valentin
24
#20
Jorge de Frutos
28
#21
Alvaro Garcia
29
#22
Pedro Diaz
34
#23
Florian Lejeune
42
#24
Unai Lopez
43
#25
Isi Palazon
51
#26
Andrei Ratiu
95
#1
Jorge de Frutos
3.62
#2
Alvaro Garcia
2.42
#3
Isi Palazon
2.37
#4
Andrei Ratiu
0.6
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jorge de Frutos
4
#2
Alvaro Garcia
2
#3
Isi Palazon
2
#4
Andrei Ratiu
1
#5
Pedro Diaz
0
#6
Unai Lopez
0
#7
Florian Lejeune
0
#8
Oscar Valentin
0
#9
Oscar Trejo
0
#10
Pelayo Fernandez
0
#11
Augusto Batalla
0
#12
Alfonso Espino
0
#13
Luiz Felipe
0
#14
Gerard Gumbau
0
#15
Randy Nteka
0
#16
Pathe Ciss
0
#17
Pep Chavarria
0
#18
Sergio Camello
0
#19
Fran Perez
0
#20
Alemao
0
#21
Samu Becerra
0
#22
Jozhua Vertrouwd
0
#23
Ivan Balliu
0
#24
Nobel Mendy
0
#25
Carlos Martin
0
#26
Ilias Akhomach
0
VfB Stuttgart: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Average Stats
These stats show VfB Stuttgart`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
Weak Stats
These are the areas where VfB Stuttgart`s performance falls below the league average.
#72
VfB Stuttgart
335
#73
Inter Milan
330
#74
Genua CFC
327
#75
LOSC Lille
326
Rayo Vallecano: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Rayo Vallecano consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#4
Rayo Vallecano
500
#5
Bayer 04 Leverkusen
487
#6
FC Metz
483
#7
Como 1907
476
Average Stats
These stats show Rayo Vallecano`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#48
Rayo Vallecano
619
#49
FSV Mainz 05
618
#50
Werder Bremen
616
#51
Everton FC
607
Performance per season
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
VfB Stuttgart has an Expected Threat of 5364.55 - ranking 4 and measuring their ability to advance the ball into dangerous positions, while Rayo Vallecano generates 4296.08 Expected Threat - sitting at 9, showing which team better progresses play toward scoring opportunities and controls the attacking tempo. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
VfB Stuttgart has an Expected Threat against of 404.82 - placing them 12 defensively, indicating how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents, while Rayo Vallecano concedes 379.24 Expected Threat against - ranking 14, revealing which defense better restricts opponent advances into threatening areas and maintains defensive solidity. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
VfB Stuttgart recorded 191 Critical ball losses - ranking 13 in possession security, meaning they've given the ball away in trouble spots, while Rayo Vallecano suffered 189 such losses - sitting at 13, highlighting which team is more vulnerable in possession under pressure and prone to dangerous turnovers. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 5364.55 4296.08 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 404.82 379.24 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 191 189 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1411 1206 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.98 1.86 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare VfB Stuttgart & Rayo Vallecano`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Advanced Stats & Analytics
Scores
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 71.52 65.18 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 63.4 65.15 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 70.72 59.44 |
| Offensive interventions | 139.1 136.91 |
Goals & Assists
| Goals | 38 18 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 36 17 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 2 1 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 4 3 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 3 2 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 0 0 |
| Goals by foot | 30 13 |
| Shots on Goal | 216 168 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 8.69 4.76 |
Goals & Shots conceded
| Goals conceeded | 27 29 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 1 2 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 20 22 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 182 179 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 1.29 1.32 |
Passing and Ball progression
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 3967 3906 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 3174 3059 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 7663 6540 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 128 210 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 173 213 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 302 380 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 44 37 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 666 798 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 1602 1984 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 5229 4248 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 1967 1493 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 109 62 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 1740 1805 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 1523 1319 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 2546 2349 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 1676 1328 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 2088 1784 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1411 1206 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 92.23 89.11 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 65.31 65.42 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 86.29 92.23 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 56.41 41.11 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 43.69 44.56 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 66.87 67.63 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 77.77 77.17 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 87.02 84.45 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 78.09 71.88 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 54.5 42.76 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 80.34 75.59 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 82.56 80.53 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 81.08 79.57 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 82.82 80.92 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 79.96 74.83 |
Ball contacts & phases of play
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 7086 5900 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1644 1842 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 472 555 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 882 726 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 943 913 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 817 847 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 512 699 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 676 574 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 984 1254 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 1558 1300 |
Ball losses
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 191 189 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 646 799 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 68 111 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 223 265 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 452 363 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 48 32 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 34 53 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 330 382 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 458 587 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 780 782 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 552 584 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 91 83 |
| Ball losses total | 2211 2418 |
Ball regains
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 2921 3012 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 228 249 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 617 793 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 1139 1060 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 408 383 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 81 83 |
Defensive
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 607 683 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 607 627 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 325 226 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 273 275 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 575 756 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 308 363 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 735 593 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 361 323 |
| Tackles | 1214 1310 |
| Clearances by foot | 426 524 |
| Ground duels total | 1214 1310 |
| Ground duels won % | 50 52.14 |
| Ground duels lost % | 50 47.86 |
| Ariel duels total | 598 501 |
| Ariel duels won % | 54.35 45.11 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 45.65 54.89 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 563.1 577.1 |
Dribbles
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 625 680 |
| Succesful dribbles | 7693 7175 |
Elimination actions & Pitch
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 335 500 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 706 941 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 1937 1648 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 770 619 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 452 614 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 1865 1825 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 1093 983 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 318 223 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 731 866 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 543 564 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 948 960 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 618 526 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 970 834 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 394 507 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1587 1536 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 880 744 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 257 190 |
xG
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 36.4 33.45 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 36.4 33.45 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 1.76 1.99 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 6.49 4.06 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 3.12 2.34 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.98 1.86 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 32.91 30.6 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 3.49 2.85 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.11 0.12 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 26.43 26.55 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.6 -15.45 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -2.49 -1.06 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 33.29 31.11 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.37 -0.51 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.24 -0.99 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.32 -3.61 |
Comments (0)