RB Leipzig vs Brentford: Who Wins? Advanced Stats, Prediction & H2H
Who is currently the better team – RB Leipzig or Brentford? Discover advanced team stats, xG metrics, Expected Threat, full H2H records, pressing & possession profiles, visualised predictions and data-driven performance analytics.
RB Leipzig vs. Brentford - Who Is Better?
RB Leipzig has created 137 scoring opportunities compared to Brentford's 96, with RB Leipzig ranking 3 and Brentford ranking 17 in the league for chances created. See Full Chances created Ranking
Brentford has conceded 26 goals versus RB Leipzig's 24, with Brentford ranking 10 and RB Leipzig ranking 5 in the league for goals conceded. See Full Goals conceeded Ranking
RB Leipzig has kept 8 clean sheets while Brentford has achieved 5 shutouts, with RB Leipzig ranking 3 and Brentford ranking 14 in the league for clean sheets. See Full Clean sheets Ranking
Key Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals | 33 35 |
| Goals | 1.94 1.67 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 276 209 |
| Shots on Goal | 190 145 |
| Goals conceeded | 24 26 |
| Goals conceeded | 1.41 1.24 |
| Matches won | 10 10 |
| Matches lost | 5 8 |
Scores
Team Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All RB Leipzig`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Team | Strengths & Weaknesses | Team |
|---|---|---|
| LEI | BRE | |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
RB Leipzig registers 812 defensive touches when not in possession versus Brentford's 947 - showcasing their defensive engagement levels
Brentford scores 5 goals from close range compared to RB Leipzig's 7 - illustrating their penalty box finishing prowess
RB Leipzig wins 50.62% of aerial duels (203 won, 323 lost) while Brentford secures 50.76% (333 won, 323 lost) - demonstrating their aerial contest outcomes
Compare Yourself
Compare RB Leipzig
Other Comparisons
RB Leipzig’s and Brentford’s Total Squad Salary
Salary Stats
#1
Romulo
0
#2
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#3
Peter Gulacsi
0
#4
Yan Diomande
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Romulo
0
#2
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#3
Peter Gulacsi
0
#4
Yan Diomande
0
#5
Lois Openda
0
#6
Nicolas Seiwald
0
#7
Ridle Baku
0
#8
Xavi Simons
0
#9
Johan Bakayoko
0
#10
Kosta Nedeljkovic
0
#11
Kevin Kampl
0
#12
Conrad Harder
0
#13
Andrija Maksimovic
0
#14
Timo Werner
0
#15
Lukas Klostermann
0
#16
El Chadaille Bitshiabu
0
#17
Tidiam Gomis
0
#18
Max Finkgrafe
0
#19
Samba Konate
0
#20
Willi Orban
0
#21
Castello Lukeba
0
#22
David Raum
0
#23
Xaver Schlager
1
#24
Antonio Nusa
1
#25
Christoph Baumgartner
1
#26
Assan Ouedraogo
2
#1
Romulo
0
#2
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#3
Yan Diomande
0
#4
Johan Bakayoko
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Romulo
0
#2
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#3
Yan Diomande
0
#4
Johan Bakayoko
0
#5
Kosta Nedeljkovic
0
#6
Conrad Harder
0
#7
Andrija Maksimovic
0
#8
Tidiam Gomis
0
#9
Max Finkgrafe
0
#10
Samba Konate
0
#11
Kevin Kampl
0
#12
Xavi Simons
1
#13
Timo Werner
1
#14
Lois Openda
1
#15
Lukas Klostermann
1
#16
El Chadaille Bitshiabu
3
#17
David Raum
3
#18
Castello Lukeba
4
#19
Willi Orban
4
#20
Peter Gulacsi
4
#21
Xaver Schlager
5
#22
Christoph Baumgartner
6
#23
Ridle Baku
6
#24
Nicolas Seiwald
7
#25
Assan Ouedraogo
11
#26
Antonio Nusa
11
#1
Romulo
0
#2
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#3
Yan Diomande
0
#4
Johan Bakayoko
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Romulo
0
#2
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#3
Yan Diomande
0
#4
Johan Bakayoko
0
#5
Kosta Nedeljkovic
0
#6
Kevin Kampl
0
#7
Conrad Harder
0
#8
Andrija Maksimovic
0
#9
Tidiam Gomis
0
#10
Max Finkgrafe
0
#11
Samba Konate
0
#12
Lois Openda
0
#13
Xavi Simons
0
#14
Lukas Klostermann
0
#15
Timo Werner
0
#16
Peter Gulacsi
1
#17
El Chadaille Bitshiabu
1
#18
Willi Orban
8
#19
Christoph Baumgartner
12
#20
Xaver Schlager
13
#21
Castello Lukeba
14
#22
Nicolas Seiwald
15
#23
David Raum
26
#24
Assan Ouedraogo
29
#25
Ridle Baku
30
#26
Antonio Nusa
57
#1
Antonio Nusa
1.91
#2
Assan Ouedraogo
1.59
#3
Christoph Baumgartner
1.26
#4
Ridle Baku
0.32
No.
Player
Value
#1
Antonio Nusa
2
#2
Assan Ouedraogo
2
#3
Christoph Baumgartner
1
#4
Ridle Baku
0
#5
Nicolas Seiwald
0
#6
David Raum
0
#7
Willi Orban
0
#8
Xaver Schlager
0
#9
Castello Lukeba
0
#10
El Chadaille Bitshiabu
0
#11
Lois Openda
0
#12
Romulo
0
#13
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#14
Peter Gulacsi
0
#15
Yan Diomande
0
#16
Xavi Simons
0
#17
Johan Bakayoko
0
#18
Kosta Nedeljkovic
0
#19
Kevin Kampl
0
#20
Conrad Harder
0
#21
Andrija Maksimovic
0
#22
Timo Werner
0
#23
Lukas Klostermann
0
#24
Tidiam Gomis
0
#25
Max Finkgrafe
0
#26
Samba Konate
0
Salary Stats
#1
Antoni Milambo
0
#2
Jordan Henderson
0
#3
Michael Kayode
0
#4
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Antoni Milambo
0
#2
Jordan Henderson
0
#3
Michael Kayode
0
#4
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
#5
Rico Henry
0
#6
Caoimhin Kelleher
0
#7
Sepp van den Berg
0
#8
Aaron Hickey
0
#9
Kevin Schade
0
#10
Frank Onyeka
0
#11
Kristoffer Ajer
0
#12
Ethan Pinnock
0
#13
Vitaly Janelt
0
#14
Reiss Nelson
0
#15
Myles Peart-Harris
0
#16
Mikkel Damsgaard
0
#17
Fabio Carvalho
0
#18
Nathan Collins
1
#19
Mathias Jensen
1
#20
Keane Lewis-Potter
1
#21
Dango Ouattara
1
#22
Igor Thiago
5
#1
Antoni Milambo
0
#2
Jordan Henderson
0
#3
Michael Kayode
0
#4
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Antoni Milambo
0
#2
Jordan Henderson
0
#3
Michael Kayode
0
#4
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
#5
Kevin Schade
0
#6
Myles Peart-Harris
0
#7
Reiss Nelson
2
#8
Ethan Pinnock
3
#9
Frank Onyeka
4
#10
Aaron Hickey
4
#11
Fabio Carvalho
5
#12
Mikkel Damsgaard
5
#13
Mathias Jensen
7
#14
Kristoffer Ajer
8
#15
Caoimhin Kelleher
8
#16
Keane Lewis-Potter
8
#17
Igor Thiago
9
#18
Dango Ouattara
10
#19
Vitaly Janelt
10
#20
Rico Henry
11
#21
Nathan Collins
15
#22
Sepp van den Berg
20
#1
Antoni Milambo
0
#2
Jordan Henderson
0
#3
Michael Kayode
0
#4
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Antoni Milambo
0
#2
Jordan Henderson
0
#3
Michael Kayode
0
#4
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
#5
Kevin Schade
0
#6
Myles Peart-Harris
0
#7
Fabio Carvalho
2
#8
Frank Onyeka
3
#9
Ethan Pinnock
4
#10
Reiss Nelson
6
#11
Aaron Hickey
6
#12
Caoimhin Kelleher
9
#13
Igor Thiago
10
#14
Kristoffer Ajer
13
#15
Keane Lewis-Potter
15
#16
Rico Henry
20
#17
Mathias Jensen
21
#18
Sepp van den Berg
24
#19
Dango Ouattara
24
#20
Mikkel Damsgaard
25
#21
Nathan Collins
31
#22
Vitaly Janelt
32
#1
Igor Thiago
4.58
#2
Dango Ouattara
1.41
#3
Sepp van den Berg
1.19
#4
Keane Lewis-Potter
0.57
No.
Player
Value
#1
Igor Thiago
5
#2
Dango Ouattara
1
#3
Sepp van den Berg
1
#4
Keane Lewis-Potter
1
#5
Nathan Collins
0
#6
Fabio Carvalho
0
#7
Mikkel Damsgaard
0
#8
Kristoffer Ajer
0
#9
Vitaly Janelt
0
#10
Reiss Nelson
0
#11
Mathias Jensen
0
#12
Rico Henry
0
#13
Aaron Hickey
0
#14
Antoni Milambo
0
#15
Jordan Henderson
0
#16
Michael Kayode
0
#17
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
#18
Caoimhin Kelleher
0
#19
Kevin Schade
0
#20
Frank Onyeka
0
#21
Ethan Pinnock
0
#22
Myles Peart-Harris
0
RB Leipzig: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where RB Leipzig consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#3
RB Leipzig
3
Average Stats
These stats show RB Leipzig`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
Weak Stats
These are the areas where RB Leipzig`s performance falls below the league average.
#62
RB Leipzig
0.33
Brentford: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where Brentford is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
#1
Brentford
954
#2
Manchester United
950
#3
Hellas Verona
929
#4
Everton FC
926
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Brentford consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#2
Brentford
451
#3
Como 1907
429
#4
Rayo Vallecano
424
#5
Chelsea
421
Average Stats
These stats show Brentford`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#48
Brentford
766
#49
ACF Fiorentina
762
#50
FC Burnley
761
#51
AFC Sunderland
747
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Brentford`s performance falls below the league average.
Performance per season
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
RB Leipzig has an Expected Threat of 3904.38 - ranking 6 and measuring their ability to advance the ball into dangerous positions, while Brentford generates 3605.45 Expected Threat - sitting at 18, showing which team better progresses play toward scoring opportunities and controls the attacking tempo. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
RB Leipzig has an Expected Threat against of 356.56 - placing them 10 defensively, indicating how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents, while Brentford concedes 600.67 Expected Threat against - ranking 2, revealing which defense better restricts opponent advances into threatening areas and maintains defensive solidity. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
RB Leipzig recorded 150 Critical ball losses - ranking 13 in possession security, meaning they've given the ball away in trouble spots, while Brentford suffered 154 such losses - sitting at 9, highlighting which team is more vulnerable in possession under pressure and prone to dangerous turnovers. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 3904.38 3605.45 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 356.56 600.67 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 150 154 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 997 911 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.05 1 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare RB Leipzig & Brentford`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Advanced Stats & Analytics
Scores
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 71.59 68.63 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 62.24 62.79 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 73.67 68.65 |
| Offensive interventions | 141.35 144.81 |
Goals & Assists
| Goals | 33 35 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 29 28 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 1 1 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 4 5 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 1 5 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 1 0 |
| Goals by foot | 26 24 |
| Shots on Goal | 190 145 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 8.84 12.45 |
Goals & Shots conceded
| Goals conceeded | 24 26 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 4 7 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 20 17 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 145 195 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 1.41 1.24 |
Passing and Ball progression
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 3205 3118 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 2415 2428 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 5701 5079 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 86 92 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 160 170 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 220 223 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 44 28 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 667 645 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 1683 1673 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 3586 3252 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 1133 1000 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 107 91 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 1461 1514 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 1104 1073 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 1890 1644 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 1300 1080 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 1421 1350 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 997 911 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 90.55 88.59 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 64.66 57.86 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 85.94 71.25 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 60.27 44.44 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 44.57 45.45 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 73.22 60.28 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 79.91 76.05 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 85.08 79.47 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 75.74 66.05 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 53.5 45.05 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 76.11 70.72 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 80.25 76.49 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 81.61 70.77 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 83.07 76.32 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 81.35 74.65 |
Ball contacts & phases of play
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 5291 4271 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1353 1567 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 318 396 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 683 954 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 812 947 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 678 767 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 443 714 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 491 643 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 761 1110 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 1174 1597 |
Ball losses
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 150 154 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 595 654 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 47 67 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 199 204 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 296 576 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 36 90 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 29 35 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 244 425 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 423 527 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 629 840 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 363 514 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 93 111 |
| Ball losses total | 1752 2417 |
Ball regains
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 2403 3041 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 211 272 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 635 794 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 861 1087 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 289 397 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 73 81 |
Defensive
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 600 542 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 553 602 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 203 333 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 198 323 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 541 675 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 259 266 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 499 812 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 333 379 |
| Tackles | 1153 1144 |
| Clearances by foot | 394 408 |
| Ground duels total | 1153 1144 |
| Ground duels won % | 52.04 47.38 |
| Ground duels lost % | 47.96 52.62 |
| Ariel duels total | 401 656 |
| Ariel duels won % | 50.62 50.76 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 49.38 49.24 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 536.8 527.2 |
Dribbles
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 648 495 |
| Succesful dribbles | 6106 5321 |
Elimination actions & Pitch
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 286 451 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 869 766 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 1339 1226 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 520 442 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 583 572 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 1426 1316 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 709 672 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 288 239 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 711 691 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 420 391 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 615 726 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 535 442 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 794 686 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 461 477 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1176 1117 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 531 529 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 199 208 |
xG
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 33.62 34.13 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 33.62 34.13 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 1 0.77 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 3.58 6.73 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 1.56 5.46 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.05 1 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 30.9 28.29 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 2.39 5.84 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.12 0.16 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 27.32 21.56 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -1.62 -0.13 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.42 -1.73 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 32.06 28.68 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.17 -0.38 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0 0.23 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 1.15 0.3 |
Comments (0)