Paris Saint-Germain vs AFC Bournemouth: Who Wins? Advanced Stats, Prediction & H2H
Who is currently the better team – Paris Saint-Germain or AFC Bournemouth? Discover advanced team stats, xG metrics, Expected Threat, full H2H records, pressing & possession profiles, visualised predictions and data-driven performance analytics.
France 
Ligue 1 
England 
Premier League 
Analyse Analyse Paris Saint-Germain vs. AFC Bournemouth - Who Is Better?
Paris Saint-Germain has a 1vs1 Score of 86.73 while AFC Bournemouth has a 1vs1 Score of 65.36, showing which team is performing better this season. View Paris Saint-Germain's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking | View AFC Bournemouth's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking
AFC Bournemouth has won 763 ground duels versus 546 for Paris Saint-Germain, with AFC Bournemouth ranking 4 and Paris Saint-Germain ranking 16 in the league for ground duels won. See Full Ground duels won Ranking
Paris Saint-Germain has accumulated 21.68 expected goals against while AFC Bournemouth faces 35.65, with Paris Saint-Germain ranking 1 and AFC Bournemouth ranking 13 in the league for xG conceded. See Full Xg total conceeded Ranking
Key Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals  | 43 40 |
| Goals | 2.15 1.67 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 341 323 |
| Shots on Goal | 231 220 |
| Goals conceeded | 16 42 |
| Goals conceeded | 0.8 1.75 |
| Matches won | 15 8 |
| Matches lost | 2 7 |
Scores
To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. Attacking Threat measures a player`s or teams ability to directly impact the game by creating scoring opportunities. It considers actions like dribbling past opponents, winning the ball in dangerous areas, and taking shots on goal. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. Attacking Threat measures a player`s or teams ability to directly impact the game by creating scoring opportunities. It considers actions like dribbling past opponents, winning the ball in dangerous areas, and taking shots on goal. Team Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All Paris Saint-Germain`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Team | Strengths & Weaknesses | Team |
|---|---|---|
| PAR | BOU | |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
Paris Saint-Germain creates 7 clear goal-scoring opportunities compared to AFC Bournemouth's 8 - highlighting their ability to fashion high-quality chances
AFC Bournemouth records 103 shots that miss the target completely versus Paris Saint-Germain's 110 - showcasing their shooting accuracy variance
Paris Saint-Germain completes 2893 passes from the right flank while AFC Bournemouth manages 1488 - exposing their right-sided distribution patterns
Compare Yourself
Paris Saint-Germain Compare Paris Saint-Germain
Search for a team Other Comparisons
Paris Saint-Germain’s and AFC Bournemouth’s Total Squad Salary
Salary Stats
#1
Warren Zaire-Emery
0
#2
Ibrahim Mbaye
0
#3
Lucas Chevalier
0
#4
Lucas Hernandez
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Warren Zaire-Emery
0
#2
Ibrahim Mbaye
0
#3
Lucas Chevalier
0
#4
Lucas Hernandez
0
#5
Vitinha
0
#6
Marquinhos
0
#7
Willian Pacho
0
#8
Senny Mayulu
0
#9
Quentin Ndjantou
0
#10
Mathis Jangeal
0
#11
Matvey Safonov
0
#12
Noah Nsoki
0
#13
Achraf Hakimi
0
#14
Fabian Ruiz
0
#15
Khvicha Kvaratskhelia
0
#16
Ilya Zabarnyi
0
#17
Kang-in Lee
0
#18
Ousmane Dembele
0
#19
Nuno Mendes
0
#20
Lucas Beraldo
0
#21
Desire Doue
1
#22
Goncalo Ramos
1
#23
Bradley Barcola
1
#24
Joao Neves
1
#1
Warren Zaire-Emery
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Warren Zaire-Emery
0
#2
Ibrahim Mbaye
0
#3
Vitinha
0
#4
Marquinhos
0
#5
Senny Mayulu
0
#6
Quentin Ndjantou
0
#7
Mathis Jangeal
0
#8
Noah Nsoki
0
#9
Ousmane Dembele
0
#10
Achraf Hakimi
0
#11
Lucas Hernandez
1
#12
Khvicha Kvaratskhelia
1
#13
Matvey Safonov
1
#14
Nuno Mendes
1
#15
Fabian Ruiz
2
#16
Bradley Barcola
2
#17
Desire Doue
2
#18
Joao Neves
2
#19
Lucas Chevalier
2
#20
Goncalo Ramos
2
#21
Kang-in Lee
2
#22
Ilya Zabarnyi
3
#23
Lucas Beraldo
3
#24
Willian Pacho
3
#1
Warren Zaire-Emery
0
#2
Ibrahim Mbaye
0
#3
Lucas Chevalier
0
#4
Vitinha
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Warren Zaire-Emery
0
#2
Ibrahim Mbaye
0
#3
Lucas Chevalier
0
#4
Vitinha
0
#5
Marquinhos
0
#6
Senny Mayulu
0
#7
Quentin Ndjantou
0
#8
Mathis Jangeal
0
#9
Noah Nsoki
0
#10
Matvey Safonov
0
#11
Goncalo Ramos
2
#12
Willian Pacho
4
#13
Lucas Hernandez
5
#14
Khvicha Kvaratskhelia
6
#15
Ousmane Dembele
7
#16
Ilya Zabarnyi
9
#17
Lucas Beraldo
10
#18
Achraf Hakimi
10
#19
Nuno Mendes
12
#20
Joao Neves
12
#21
Desire Doue
15
#22
Bradley Barcola
15
#23
Fabian Ruiz
18
#24
Kang-in Lee
26
#1
Bradley Barcola
0.78
#2
Goncalo Ramos
0.74
#3
Kang-in Lee
0.42
#4
Desire Doue
0.41
No.
Player
Value
#1
Bradley Barcola
1
#2
Goncalo Ramos
1
#3
Kang-in Lee
0
#4
Desire Doue
0
#5
Joao Neves
0
#6
Willian Pacho
0
#7
Fabian Ruiz
0
#8
Khvicha Kvaratskhelia
0
#9
Nuno Mendes
0
#10
Lucas Beraldo
0
#11
Ousmane Dembele
0
#12
Achraf Hakimi
0
#13
Ilya Zabarnyi
0
#14
Lucas Hernandez
0
#15
Warren Zaire-Emery
0
#16
Ibrahim Mbaye
0
#17
Lucas Chevalier
0
#18
Vitinha
0
#19
Marquinhos
0
#20
Senny Mayulu
0
#21
Quentin Ndjantou
0
#22
Mathis Jangeal
0
#23
Matvey Safonov
0
#24
Noah Nsoki
0
Salary Stats
#1
Djordje Petrovic
0
#2
Marcos Senesi
0
#3
Ben Winterburn
0
#4
Hamed Junior Traore
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Djordje Petrovic
0
#2
Marcos Senesi
0
#3
Ben Winterburn
0
#4
Hamed Junior Traore
0
#5
Bafode Diakite
0
#6
Adrien Truffert
0
#7
James Hill
0
#8
Adam Smith
0
#9
Julio Soler
0
#10
Veljko Milosavljevic
0
#11
Lewis Cook
0
#12
Ben Doak
0
#13
Enes Unal
0
#14
Alex Toth
0
#15
Rayan
0
#16
Ryan Christie
0
#17
David Brooks
0
#18
Justin Kluivert
0
#19
Tyler Adams
1
#20
Amine Adli
1
#21
Alex Scott
1
#22
Alex Jimenez
1
#23
Evanilson
1
#24
Marcus Tavernier
1
#25
Antoine Semenyo
2
#26
Eli Junior Kroupi
7
#1
Ben Winterburn
0
#2
James Hill
0
#3
Julio Soler
0
#4
Veljko Milosavljevic
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Ben Winterburn
0
#2
James Hill
0
#3
Julio Soler
0
#4
Veljko Milosavljevic
0
#5
Ben Doak
0
#6
Enes Unal
0
#7
Alex Toth
0
#8
Rayan
0
#9
Hamed Junior Traore
1
#10
Ryan Christie
5
#11
Justin Kluivert
7
#12
Bafode Diakite
7
#13
Evanilson
8
#14
Tyler Adams
8
#15
Lewis Cook
8
#16
Antoine Semenyo
8
#17
Amine Adli
8
#18
Marcus Tavernier
10
#19
Adam Smith
11
#20
Djordje Petrovic
12
#21
David Brooks
12
#22
Marcos Senesi
14
#23
Alex Scott
18
#24
Adrien Truffert
20
#25
Alex Jimenez
32
#26
Eli Junior Kroupi
32
#1
Ben Winterburn
0
#2
Hamed Junior Traore
0
#3
James Hill
0
#4
Julio Soler
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Ben Winterburn
0
#2
Hamed Junior Traore
0
#3
James Hill
0
#4
Julio Soler
0
#5
Veljko Milosavljevic
0
#6
Ben Doak
0
#7
Enes Unal
0
#8
Alex Toth
0
#9
Rayan
0
#10
Djordje Petrovic
4
#11
Evanilson
4
#12
Bafode Diakite
8
#13
Lewis Cook
8
#14
Amine Adli
10
#15
Ryan Christie
11
#16
Adam Smith
11
#17
Justin Kluivert
12
#18
Tyler Adams
13
#19
Eli Junior Kroupi
15
#20
Marcus Tavernier
22
#21
Antoine Semenyo
25
#22
Alex Scott
29
#23
David Brooks
30
#24
Marcos Senesi
56
#25
Adrien Truffert
78
#26
Alex Jimenez
87
#1
Eli Junior Kroupi
2.92
#2
David Brooks
1.9
#3
Evanilson
1.64
#4
Antoine Semenyo
1.41
No.
Player
Value
#1
Eli Junior Kroupi
3
#2
David Brooks
2
#3
Evanilson
2
#4
Antoine Semenyo
1
#5
Marcus Tavernier
1
#6
Alex Jimenez
1
#7
Alex Scott
1
#8
Amine Adli
1
#9
Justin Kluivert
0
#10
Marcos Senesi
0
#11
Adrien Truffert
0
#12
Ryan Christie
0
#13
Tyler Adams
0
#14
Lewis Cook
0
#15
Bafode Diakite
0
#16
Djordje Petrovic
0
#17
Ben Winterburn
0
#18
Hamed Junior Traore
0
#19
James Hill
0
#20
Adam Smith
0
#21
Julio Soler
0
#22
Veljko Milosavljevic
0
#23
Ben Doak
0
#24
Enes Unal
0
#25
Alex Toth
0
#26
Rayan
0
Paris Saint-Germain: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where Paris Saint-Germain is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Paris Saint-Germain consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#2
Paris Saint-Germain
1491
#3
Barcelona
1480
#4
Real Madrid
1414
#5
Liverpool FC
1413
Average Stats
These stats show Paris Saint-Germain`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#10
Paris Saint-Germain
1020
#11
Real Madrid
1009
#12
Villarreal
998
#13
Liverpool FC
989
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Paris Saint-Germain`s performance falls below the league average.
#85
Paris Saint-Germain
465
#86
Angers SCO
463
#87
RC Strasbourg
462
#88
Nice
460
AFC Bournemouth: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where AFC Bournemouth is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where AFC Bournemouth consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
Average Stats
These stats show AFC Bournemouth`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#43
AFC Bournemouth
1617
#44
Aston Villa
1604
#45
Tottenham Hotspur
1594
#46
Nottingham Forrest
1592
Weak Stats
These are the areas where AFC Bournemouth`s performance falls below the league average.
#82
AFC Bournemouth
428
#83
Pisa Sporting Club
428
#84
Nantes
423
#85
Lecce
422
Performance per season
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
Paris Saint-Germain has an Expected Threat of 8629.03 - ranking 1 and measuring their ability to advance the ball into dangerous positions, while AFC Bournemouth generates 5069.94 Expected Threat - sitting at 12, showing which team better progresses play toward scoring opportunities and controls the attacking tempo. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
Paris Saint-Germain has an Expected Threat against of 259.69 - placing them 18 defensively, indicating how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents, while AFC Bournemouth concedes 655.35 Expected Threat against - ranking 4, revealing which defense better restricts opponent advances into threatening areas and maintains defensive solidity. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
Paris Saint-Germain recorded 208 Critical ball losses - ranking 16 in possession security, meaning they've given the ball away in trouble spots, while AFC Bournemouth suffered 203 such losses - sitting at 16, highlighting which team is more vulnerable in possession under pressure and prone to dangerous turnovers. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 8629.03 5069.94 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 259.69 655.35 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 208 203 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1857 1244 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.9 1.02 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare Paris Saint-Germain & AFC Bournemouth`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Advanced Stats & Analytics
Scores
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 86.73 65.36 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 88.52 56.82 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 77.63 70.26 |
| Offensive interventions | 115.1 149.67 |
Goals & Assists
| Goals | 43 40 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 39 30 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 4 5 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 6 2 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 3 3 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 1 2 |
| Goals by foot | 33 32 |
| Shots on Goal | 231 220 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 9.53 9.39 |
Goals & Shots conceded
| Goals conceeded | 16 42 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 2 9 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 13 28 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 118 217 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 0.8 1.75 |
Passing and Ball progression
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 4927 3719 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 3709 2809 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 11981 6179 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 218 127 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 145 222 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 314 324 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 85 36 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 697 596 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 2368 1539 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 7189 4110 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 3393 1727 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 156 107 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 2893 1488 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 2497 1182 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 3485 1815 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 2430 1438 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 2498 2156 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1857 1244 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 95.14 90.32 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 80.74 59.07 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 96.02 83.94 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 78.7 37.89 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 54.31 40.88 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 80.58 58.95 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 90.45 72.12 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 93.06 80.95 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 87.99 74.66 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 56.12 43.15 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 88.18 76.73 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 89.77 76.45 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 90.68 71.97 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 91.77 76.46 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 89.35 73.52 |
Ball contacts & phases of play
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 11476 5361 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1678 1854 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 510 490 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 532 931 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 791 1035 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 749 1002 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 313 827 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 465 761 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 823 1317 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 997 1692 |
Ball losses
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 208 203 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 612 662 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 52 88 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 122 321 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 195 573 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 13 62 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 23 59 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 168 415 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 250 595 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 536 967 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 463 586 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 122 141 |
| Ball losses total | 1539 2704 |
Ball regains
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 2302 3592 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 156 316 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 486 891 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 891 1281 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 468 500 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 74 122 |
Defensive
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 546 763 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 639 792 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 132 356 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 146 396 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 601 780 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 258 418 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 365 813 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 291 467 |
| Tackles | 1185 1555 |
| Clearances by foot | 287 597 |
| Ground duels total | 1185 1555 |
| Ground duels won % | 46.08 49.07 |
| Ground duels lost % | 53.92 50.93 |
| Ariel duels total | 278 752 |
| Ariel duels won % | 47.48 47.34 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 52.52 52.66 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 213.6 631.5 |
Dribbles
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 1092 699 |
| Succesful dribbles | 11888 6833 |
Elimination actions & Pitch
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 302 423 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 1033 777 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 2236 1617 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 1160 635 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 671 514 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 2188 1616 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 1491 914 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 366 330 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 1141 704 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 804 428 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 1020 777 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 823 626 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 1021 981 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 532 430 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1740 1318 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1097 712 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 277 255 |
xG
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 38.49 40.92 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 38.49 40.92 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 2.32 2.23 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 5.47 4.82 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 3.12 3.12 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.9 1.02 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 34.41 36.67 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 4.09 4.25 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.11 0.13 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 28.94 31.85 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 4.51 -0.92 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.53 -2.82 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 35.38 37.8 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.03 0.91 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 1.68 2.77 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 2.25 1 |
Comments (0)