Nantes vs Getafe: Who Wins? Advanced Stats, Prediction & H2H
Who is currently the better team – Nantes or Getafe? Discover advanced team stats, xG metrics, Expected Threat, full H2H records, pressing & possession profiles, visualised predictions and data-driven performance analytics.
Nantes vs. Getafe - Who Is Better?
Nantes has completed 5511 successful passes compared to Getafe's 4475, with Nantes ranking 17 and Getafe ranking 20 in the league for successful passes. See Full Successful passes Ranking
Getafe has won 618 ground duels versus 439 for Nantes, with Getafe ranking 9 and Nantes ranking 17 in the league for ground duels won. See Full Ground duels won Ranking
Nantes has accumulated 31.6 expected goals against while Getafe faces 21.9, with Nantes ranking 15 and Getafe ranking 1 in the league for xG conceded. See Full Xg total conceeded Ranking
Key Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals | 16 15 |
| Goals | 0.94 0.79 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 192 180 |
| Shots on Goal | 126 117 |
| Goals conceeded | 27 23 |
| Goals conceeded | 1.59 1.21 |
| Matches won | 3 6 |
| Matches lost | 9 10 |
Scores
Team Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All Nantes`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Team | Strengths & Weaknesses | Team |
|---|---|---|
| NAN | GET | |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
Nantes creates 4 clear goal-scoring opportunities compared to Getafe's 3 - highlighting their ability to fashion high-quality chances
Getafe records 63 shots that miss the target completely versus Nantes's 66 - showcasing their shooting accuracy variance
Nantes completes 1208 passes from the right flank while Getafe manages 1023 - exposing their right-sided distribution patterns
Compare Yourself
Compare Nantes
Other Comparisons
Nantes’s and Getafe’s Total Squad Salary
Salary Stats
#1
Dehmaine Tabibou
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Dehmaine Tabibou
0
#2
Amady Camara
0
#3
Hyeok-kyu Kwon
0
#4
Louis Leroux
0
#5
Herba Guirassy
0
#6
Kelvin Amian
0
#7
Nicolas Cozza
0
#8
Johann Lepenant
0
#9
Hyun-seok Hong
0
#10
Francis Coquelin
0
#11
Anthony Lopes
0
#12
Youssef El Arabi
0
#13
Tylel Tati
0
#14
Yassine Benhattab
0
#15
Junior Mwanga
0
#16
Mayckel Lahdo
0
#17
Tylel Tati
0
#18
Yassine Benhattab
0
#19
Uros Radakovic
0
#20
Bahmed Deuff
0
#21
Patrik Carlgren
0
#22
Deiver Machado
0
#23
Sekou Doucoure
0
#24
Remy Cabella
0
#25
Chidozie Awaziem
1
#26
Mostafa Mohamed
1
#27
Fabien Centonze
1
#28
Matthis Abline
2
#1
Dehmaine Tabibou
0
#2
Amady Camara
0
#3
Hyeok-kyu Kwon
0
#4
Louis Leroux
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Dehmaine Tabibou
0
#2
Amady Camara
0
#3
Hyeok-kyu Kwon
0
#4
Louis Leroux
0
#5
Herba Guirassy
0
#6
Johann Lepenant
0
#7
Youssef El Arabi
0
#8
Tylel Tati
0
#9
Yassine Benhattab
0
#10
Junior Mwanga
0
#11
Mayckel Lahdo
0
#12
Tylel Tati
0
#13
Yassine Benhattab
0
#14
Uros Radakovic
0
#15
Bahmed Deuff
0
#16
Patrik Carlgren
0
#17
Sekou Doucoure
0
#18
Remy Cabella
0
#19
Francis Coquelin
2
#20
Hyun-seok Hong
2
#21
Deiver Machado
2
#22
Anthony Lopes
8
#23
Nicolas Cozza
9
#24
Fabien Centonze
10
#25
Mostafa Mohamed
15
#26
Chidozie Awaziem
20
#27
Kelvin Amian
23
#28
Matthis Abline
25
#1
Dehmaine Tabibou
0
#2
Amady Camara
0
#3
Hyeok-kyu Kwon
0
#4
Louis Leroux
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Dehmaine Tabibou
0
#2
Amady Camara
0
#3
Hyeok-kyu Kwon
0
#4
Louis Leroux
0
#5
Herba Guirassy
0
#6
Johann Lepenant
0
#7
Youssef El Arabi
0
#8
Tylel Tati
0
#9
Yassine Benhattab
0
#10
Junior Mwanga
0
#11
Mayckel Lahdo
0
#12
Tylel Tati
0
#13
Yassine Benhattab
0
#14
Uros Radakovic
0
#15
Bahmed Deuff
0
#16
Patrik Carlgren
0
#17
Sekou Doucoure
0
#18
Remy Cabella
0
#19
Francis Coquelin
1
#20
Hyun-seok Hong
3
#21
Anthony Lopes
3
#22
Deiver Machado
3
#23
Mostafa Mohamed
6
#24
Fabien Centonze
11
#25
Nicolas Cozza
20
#26
Matthis Abline
42
#27
Chidozie Awaziem
48
#28
Kelvin Amian
69
#1
Matthis Abline
3.57
#2
Mostafa Mohamed
1.14
#3
Fabien Centonze
0.54
#4
Kelvin Amian
0.36
No.
Player
Value
#1
Matthis Abline
4
#2
Mostafa Mohamed
1
#3
Fabien Centonze
1
#4
Kelvin Amian
0
#5
Hyun-seok Hong
0
#6
Nicolas Cozza
0
#7
Chidozie Awaziem
0
#8
Francis Coquelin
0
#9
Anthony Lopes
0
#10
Dehmaine Tabibou
0
#11
Amady Camara
0
#12
Hyeok-kyu Kwon
0
#13
Louis Leroux
0
#14
Herba Guirassy
0
#15
Johann Lepenant
0
#16
Youssef El Arabi
0
#17
Tylel Tati
0
#18
Yassine Benhattab
0
#19
Junior Mwanga
0
#20
Mayckel Lahdo
0
#21
Tylel Tati
0
#22
Yassine Benhattab
0
#23
Uros Radakovic
0
#24
Bahmed Deuff
0
#25
Patrik Carlgren
0
#26
Deiver Machado
0
#27
Sekou Doucoure
0
#28
Remy Cabella
0
Salary Stats
#1
Mario Martin
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Mario Martin
0
#2
Adrian Liso
0
#3
Christantus Uche
0
#4
Davinchi
0
#5
Ismael Bekhoucha
0
#6
Luis Milla
0
#7
Alex Sola
0
#8
David Soria
0
#9
Juan Iglesias
0
#10
Diego Rico
0
#11
Djene
0
#12
Coba da Costa
0
#13
Domingos Duarte
0
#14
Abu Kamara
0
#15
Yvan Neyou
0
#16
Abdel Abqar
0
#17
Kiko Femenia
0
#18
Alex Sancris
0
#19
Javi Munoz
0
#20
Allan Nyom
0
#21
Juanmi
0
#22
Hugo Solozabal
0
#23
Joselu Perez
0
#24
Alejandro Mestanza
0
#25
Jorge Montes
0
#26
Mauro Arambarri
1
#27
Borja Mayoral
1
#1
Mario Martin
0
#2
Adrian Liso
0
#3
Christantus Uche
0
#4
Davinchi
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Mario Martin
0
#2
Adrian Liso
0
#3
Christantus Uche
0
#4
Davinchi
0
#5
Ismael Bekhoucha
0
#6
Alex Sola
0
#7
Juan Iglesias
0
#8
Djene
0
#9
Coba da Costa
0
#10
Abu Kamara
0
#11
Yvan Neyou
0
#12
Abdel Abqar
0
#13
Alex Sancris
0
#14
Allan Nyom
0
#15
Juanmi
0
#16
Hugo Solozabal
0
#17
Joselu Perez
0
#18
Alejandro Mestanza
0
#19
Jorge Montes
0
#20
Borja Mayoral
4
#21
Mauro Arambarri
6
#22
Javi Munoz
8
#23
David Soria
9
#24
Diego Rico
11
#25
Luis Milla
15
#26
Kiko Femenia
15
#27
Domingos Duarte
16
#1
Mario Martin
0
#2
Adrian Liso
0
#3
Christantus Uche
0
#4
Davinchi
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Mario Martin
0
#2
Adrian Liso
0
#3
Christantus Uche
0
#4
Davinchi
0
#5
Ismael Bekhoucha
0
#6
Alex Sola
0
#7
Juan Iglesias
0
#8
Djene
0
#9
Coba da Costa
0
#10
Abu Kamara
0
#11
Yvan Neyou
0
#12
Abdel Abqar
0
#13
Alex Sancris
0
#14
Allan Nyom
0
#15
Juanmi
0
#16
Hugo Solozabal
0
#17
Joselu Perez
0
#18
Alejandro Mestanza
0
#19
Jorge Montes
0
#20
Borja Mayoral
4
#21
Javi Munoz
11
#22
Mauro Arambarri
11
#23
David Soria
14
#24
Domingos Duarte
25
#25
Diego Rico
69
#26
Kiko Femenia
70
#27
Luis Milla
86
#1
Mauro Arambarri
0.89
#2
Borja Mayoral
0.73
#3
Luis Milla
0.4
#4
Domingos Duarte
0.33
No.
Player
Value
#1
Mauro Arambarri
1
#2
Borja Mayoral
1
#3
Luis Milla
0
#4
Domingos Duarte
0
#5
Javi Munoz
0
#6
Kiko Femenia
0
#7
Diego Rico
0
#8
Mario Martin
0
#9
Adrian Liso
0
#10
Christantus Uche
0
#11
Davinchi
0
#12
Ismael Bekhoucha
0
#13
Alex Sola
0
#14
David Soria
0
#15
Juan Iglesias
0
#16
Djene
0
#17
Coba da Costa
0
#18
Abu Kamara
0
#19
Yvan Neyou
0
#20
Abdel Abqar
0
#21
Alex Sancris
0
#22
Allan Nyom
0
#23
Juanmi
0
#24
Hugo Solozabal
0
#25
Joselu Perez
0
#26
Alejandro Mestanza
0
#27
Jorge Montes
0
Nantes: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Average Stats
These stats show Nantes`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Nantes`s performance falls below the league average.
#89
Nantes
4031
#90
Levante UD
3900
#91
FSV Mainz 05
3829
#92
Toulouse
3774
Getafe: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where Getafe is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
#1
Getafe
617
#2
AS Roma
592
#3
Tottenham Hotspur
580
#4
Newcastle United
569
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Getafe consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#2
Getafe
355
#3
Rayo Vallecano
353
#4
Napoli
336
#5
Fulham
330
#2
Getafe
0
Average Stats
These stats show Getafe`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#70
Getafe
466
#71
Hellas Verona
458
#72
Crystal Palace
456
#73
Wolverhampton Wanderers
455
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Getafe`s performance falls below the league average.
#94
Getafe
230
Performance per season
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
Nantes has an Expected Threat of 2261.88 - ranking 18 and measuring their ability to advance the ball into dangerous positions, while Getafe generates 2552.69 Expected Threat - sitting at 20, showing which team better progresses play toward scoring opportunities and controls the attacking tempo. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
Nantes has an Expected Threat against of 416.39 - placing them 2 defensively, indicating how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents, while Getafe concedes 310.62 Expected Threat against - ranking 17, revealing which defense better restricts opponent advances into threatening areas and maintains defensive solidity. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
Nantes recorded 155 Critical ball losses - ranking 11 in possession security, meaning they've given the ball away in trouble spots, while Getafe suffered 138 such losses - sitting at 6, highlighting which team is more vulnerable in possession under pressure and prone to dangerous turnovers. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 2261.88 2552.69 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 416.39 310.62 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 155 138 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 625 927 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.29 1.11 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare Nantes & Getafe`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Advanced Stats & Analytics
Scores
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 57.22 62.48 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 54.47 68.35 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 59.41 51.9 |
| Offensive interventions | 133.94 147.74 |
Goals & Assists
| Goals | 16 15 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 16 15 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 1 1 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 3 5 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 1 0 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 0 0 |
| Goals by foot | 14 10 |
| Shots on Goal | 126 117 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 6.98 6.17 |
Goals & Shots conceded
| Goals conceeded | 27 23 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 3 5 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 21 17 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 180 139 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 1.59 1.21 |
Passing and Ball progression
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 2559 2639 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 1939 1998 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 4031 2875 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 99 102 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 150 182 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 256 355 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 17 30 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 665 244 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 1520 819 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 2626 2372 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 653 996 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 47 44 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 1208 1023 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 922 585 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 1547 974 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 837 698 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 997 1195 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 625 927 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 87.88 84.16 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 61.88 56.04 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 83.39 86.17 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 44.74 51.72 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 45.05 40.18 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 67.24 45.35 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 76.15 62.81 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 81.15 73.62 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 67.25 65.01 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 39.5 39.29 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 68.9 65.48 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 78.81 69.04 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 76.7 65.41 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 78.14 67.71 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 75.26 67.35 |
Ball contacts & phases of play
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 3859 2098 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1110 1303 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 299 617 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 622 914 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 855 870 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 574 707 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 422 587 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 439 662 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 721 1204 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 1061 1576 |
Ball losses
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 155 138 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 556 541 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 61 80 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 183 271 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 306 455 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 51 57 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 21 28 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 324 294 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 476 485 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 610 850 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 318 536 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 72 68 |
| Ball losses total | 1800 2233 |
Ball regains
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 2277 2807 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 238 153 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 720 657 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 697 1132 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 255 379 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 66 57 |
Defensive
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 439 618 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 459 631 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 171 306 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 192 389 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 525 594 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 261 343 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 447 673 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 311 304 |
| Tackles | 898 1249 |
| Clearances by foot | 346 512 |
| Ground duels total | 898 1249 |
| Ground duels won % | 48.89 49.48 |
| Ground duels lost % | 51.11 50.52 |
| Ariel duels total | 363 695 |
| Ariel duels won % | 47.11 44.03 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 52.89 55.97 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 326.5 502.2 |
Dribbles
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 473 407 |
| Succesful dribbles | 4361 3512 |
Elimination actions & Pitch
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 328 230 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 732 539 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 1053 1160 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 280 466 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 500 316 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 1208 1123 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 472 779 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 153 148 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 642 614 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 367 286 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 570 491 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 320 331 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 527 696 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 401 252 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 979 951 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 374 631 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 121 126 |
xG
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 23.2 16.66 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 23.2 16.66 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 1.35 1.38 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 2.12 3.21 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 3.12 0.78 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.29 1.11 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 19.5 15.6 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 3.7 1.06 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.12 0.09 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 17.38 12.39 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -5.2 -1.66 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.88 1.79 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 20.08 15.88 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.58 -0.28 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.35 -0.38 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 1.56 -0.66 |
Comments (0)