Bayern Munich vs Tottenham Hotspur: Who Wins? Advanced Stats, Prediction & H2H
Who is currently the better team – Bayern Munich or Tottenham Hotspur? Discover advanced team stats, xG metrics, Expected Threat, full H2H records, pressing & possession profiles, visualised predictions and data-driven performance analytics.
Bayern Munich vs. Tottenham Hotspur - Who Is Better?
Bayern Munich has a 1vs1 Score of 100 while Tottenham Hotspur has a 1vs1 Score of 65.61, showing which team is performing better this season. View Bayern Munich's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking | View Tottenham Hotspur's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking
Tottenham Hotspur has won 909 ground duels versus 566 for Bayern Munich, with Tottenham Hotspur ranking 1 and Bayern Munich ranking 14 in the league for ground duels won. See Full Ground duels won Ranking
Bayern Munich has accumulated 21.62 expected goals against while Tottenham Hotspur faces 37.31, with Bayern Munich ranking 1 and Tottenham Hotspur ranking 11 in the league for xG conceded. See Full Xg total conceeded Ranking
Key Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals | 79 35 |
| Goals | 3.76 1.4 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 394 269 |
| Shots on Goal | 290 186 |
| Goals conceeded | 19 35 |
| Goals conceeded | 0.9 1.4 |
| Matches won | 17 7 |
| Matches lost | 1 10 |
Scores
Team Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All Bayern Munich`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Team | Strengths & Weaknesses | Team |
|---|---|---|
| BAY | TOT | |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
Bayern Munich creates 8 clear goal-scoring opportunities compared to Tottenham Hotspur's 5 - highlighting their ability to fashion high-quality chances
Tottenham Hotspur records 83 shots that miss the target completely versus Bayern Munich's 104 - showcasing their shooting accuracy variance
Bayern Munich completes 3061 passes from the right flank while Tottenham Hotspur manages 1814 - exposing their right-sided distribution patterns
Compare Yourself
Compare Bayern Munich
Other Comparisons
Bayern Munich’s and Tottenham Hotspur’s Total Squad Salary
Salary Stats
#1
Jonah Kusi-Asare
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jonah Kusi-Asare
0
#2
Lennart Karl
0
#3
Sacha Boey
0
#4
Manuel Neuer
0
#5
Tom Bischof
0
#6
Wisdom Mike
0
#7
Jonas Urbig
0
#8
Alphonso Davies
0
#9
David Santos
0
#10
Cassiano Kiala
0
#11
Felipe Chavez
0
#12
Jamal Musiala
0
#13
Joshua Kimmich
0
#14
Leon Goretzka
0
#15
Min-jae Kim
0
#16
Dayot Upamecano
0
#17
Jonathan Tah
0
#18
Konrad Laimer
0
#19
Hiroki Ito
0
#20
Josip Stanisic
0
#21
Serge Gnabry
0
#22
Raphael Guerreiro
0
#23
Nicolas Jackson
1
#24
Michael Olise
1
#25
Luis Diaz
1
#26
Harry Kane
1
#27
Aleksandar Pavlovic
1
#1
Jonah Kusi-Asare
0
#2
Lennart Karl
0
#3
Tom Bischof
0
#4
Wisdom Mike
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jonah Kusi-Asare
0
#2
Lennart Karl
0
#3
Tom Bischof
0
#4
Wisdom Mike
0
#5
Jonas Urbig
0
#6
David Santos
0
#7
Cassiano Kiala
0
#8
Felipe Chavez
0
#9
Jamal Musiala
0
#10
Alphonso Davies
1
#11
Raphael Guerreiro
1
#12
Serge Gnabry
1
#13
Joshua Kimmich
1
#14
Harry Kane
1
#15
Manuel Neuer
1
#16
Sacha Boey
1
#17
Min-jae Kim
1
#18
Luis Diaz
1
#19
Leon Goretzka
1
#20
Dayot Upamecano
1
#21
Michael Olise
1
#22
Jonathan Tah
1
#23
Konrad Laimer
2
#24
Josip Stanisic
2
#25
Nicolas Jackson
2
#26
Hiroki Ito
3
#27
Aleksandar Pavlovic
11
#1
Jonah Kusi-Asare
0
#2
Lennart Karl
0
#3
Tom Bischof
0
#4
Wisdom Mike
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jonah Kusi-Asare
0
#2
Lennart Karl
0
#3
Tom Bischof
0
#4
Wisdom Mike
0
#5
Jonas Urbig
0
#6
David Santos
0
#7
Cassiano Kiala
0
#8
Felipe Chavez
0
#9
Jamal Musiala
0
#10
Manuel Neuer
1
#11
Alphonso Davies
2
#12
Min-jae Kim
3
#13
Nicolas Jackson
3
#14
Raphael Guerreiro
3
#15
Harry Kane
4
#16
Serge Gnabry
5
#17
Jonathan Tah
5
#18
Sacha Boey
8
#19
Leon Goretzka
8
#20
Dayot Upamecano
9
#21
Joshua Kimmich
10
#22
Josip Stanisic
13
#23
Hiroki Ito
13
#24
Konrad Laimer
14
#25
Luis Diaz
16
#26
Michael Olise
27
#27
Aleksandar Pavlovic
82
#1
Aleksandar Pavlovic
0.75
No.
Player
Value
#1
Aleksandar Pavlovic
1
#2
Harry Kane
1
#3
Luis Diaz
1
#4
Nicolas Jackson
1
#5
Michael Olise
0
#6
Serge Gnabry
0
#7
Raphael Guerreiro
0
#8
Konrad Laimer
0
#9
Hiroki Ito
0
#10
Leon Goretzka
0
#11
Josip Stanisic
0
#12
Dayot Upamecano
0
#13
Sacha Boey
0
#14
Joshua Kimmich
0
#15
Jonathan Tah
0
#16
Min-jae Kim
0
#17
Jamal Musiala
0
#18
Alphonso Davies
0
#19
Jonah Kusi-Asare
0
#20
Lennart Karl
0
#21
Manuel Neuer
0
#22
Tom Bischof
0
#23
Wisdom Mike
0
#24
Jonas Urbig
0
#25
David Santos
0
#26
Cassiano Kiala
0
#27
Felipe Chavez
0
Salary Stats
#1
Wilson Odobert
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Wilson Odobert
0
#2
Joao Palhinha
0
#3
Djed Spence
0
#4
Pedro Porro
0
#5
Pape Matar Sarr
0
#6
Mathys Tel
0
#7
Guglielmo Vicario
0
#8
Kevin Danso
0
#9
Destiny Udogie
0
#10
Randal Kolo Muani
0
#11
Radu Dragusin
0
#12
Dane Scarlett
0
#13
Yves Bissouma
0
#14
Conor Gallagher
0
#15
Junai Byfield
0
#16
Souza
0
#17
Xavi Simons
0
#18
Ben Davies
0
#19
Archie Gray
0
#20
Rodrigo Bentancur
0
#21
Mohammed Kudus
0
#22
Dominic Solanke
0
#23
Lucas Bergvall
0
#24
Brennan Johnson
0
#25
Cristian Romero
0
#26
Richarlison
1
#27
Micky van de Ven
1
#1
Joao Palhinha
0
#2
Pape Matar Sarr
0
#3
Mathys Tel
0
#4
Randal Kolo Muani
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Joao Palhinha
0
#2
Pape Matar Sarr
0
#3
Mathys Tel
0
#4
Randal Kolo Muani
0
#5
Dane Scarlett
0
#6
Junai Byfield
0
#7
Souza
0
#8
Conor Gallagher
1
#9
Dominic Solanke
1
#10
Radu Dragusin
1
#11
Ben Davies
1
#12
Yves Bissouma
2
#13
Mohammed Kudus
2
#14
Cristian Romero
3
#15
Xavi Simons
3
#16
Brennan Johnson
4
#17
Kevin Danso
4
#18
Destiny Udogie
5
#19
Richarlison
5
#20
Archie Gray
5
#21
Lucas Bergvall
6
#22
Rodrigo Bentancur
6
#23
Pedro Porro
6
#24
Guglielmo Vicario
8
#25
Micky van de Ven
10
#26
Djed Spence
11
#27
Wilson Odobert
21
#1
Joao Palhinha
0
#2
Pape Matar Sarr
0
#3
Mathys Tel
0
#4
Randal Kolo Muani
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Joao Palhinha
0
#2
Pape Matar Sarr
0
#3
Mathys Tel
0
#4
Randal Kolo Muani
0
#5
Dane Scarlett
0
#6
Junai Byfield
0
#7
Souza
0
#8
Dominic Solanke
0
#9
Radu Dragusin
1
#10
Conor Gallagher
2
#11
Ben Davies
3
#12
Yves Bissouma
4
#13
Brennan Johnson
4
#14
Richarlison
5
#15
Guglielmo Vicario
5
#16
Kevin Danso
6
#17
Archie Gray
6
#18
Cristian Romero
7
#19
Xavi Simons
7
#20
Lucas Bergvall
10
#21
Rodrigo Bentancur
11
#22
Mohammed Kudus
12
#23
Destiny Udogie
15
#24
Micky van de Ven
16
#25
Pedro Porro
39
#26
Djed Spence
46
#27
Wilson Odobert
51
#1
Wilson Odobert
1.48
#2
Richarlison
1.01
#3
Micky van de Ven
0.75
#4
Djed Spence
0.45
No.
Player
Value
#1
Wilson Odobert
1
#2
Richarlison
1
#3
Micky van de Ven
1
#4
Djed Spence
0
#5
Lucas Bergvall
0
#6
Mohammed Kudus
0
#7
Pedro Porro
0
#8
Xavi Simons
0
#9
Archie Gray
0
#10
Rodrigo Bentancur
0
#11
Brennan Johnson
0
#12
Destiny Udogie
0
#13
Dominic Solanke
0
#14
Ben Davies
0
#15
Yves Bissouma
0
#16
Cristian Romero
0
#17
Conor Gallagher
0
#18
Kevin Danso
0
#19
Radu Dragusin
0
#20
Joao Palhinha
0
#21
Pape Matar Sarr
0
#22
Mathys Tel
0
#23
Guglielmo Vicario
0
#24
Randal Kolo Muani
0
#25
Dane Scarlett
0
#26
Junai Byfield
0
#27
Souza
0
Bayern Munich: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where Bayern Munich is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Bayern Munich consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Bayern Munich`s performance falls below the league average.
#77
Bayern Munich
723
#78
Lens
719
#79
Nice
719
#80
Stade Rennais
708
#77
Bayern Munich
714
#78
Nice
703
#79
S.S. Lazio
700
#80
Real Oviedo
699
Tottenham Hotspur: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where Tottenham Hotspur is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Tottenham Hotspur consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
Average Stats
These stats show Tottenham Hotspur`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Tottenham Hotspur`s performance falls below the league average.
Performance per season
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
Bayern Munich has an Expected Threat of 9745.93 - ranking 1 and measuring their ability to advance the ball into dangerous positions, while Tottenham Hotspur generates 5764.55 Expected Threat - sitting at 10, showing which team better progresses play toward scoring opportunities and controls the attacking tempo. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
Bayern Munich has an Expected Threat against of 310.26 - placing them 18 defensively, indicating how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents, while Tottenham Hotspur concedes 550.36 Expected Threat against - ranking 15, revealing which defense better restricts opponent advances into threatening areas and maintains defensive solidity. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
Bayern Munich recorded 209 Critical ball losses - ranking 17 in possession security, meaning they've given the ball away in trouble spots, while Tottenham Hotspur suffered 223 such losses - sitting at 19, highlighting which team is more vulnerable in possession under pressure and prone to dangerous turnovers. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 9745.93 5764.55 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 310.26 550.36 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 209 223 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 2111 1241 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.77 0.85 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare Bayern Munich & Tottenham Hotspur`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Advanced Stats & Analytics
Scores
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 100 65.61 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 83.71 64.01 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 100 60.05 |
| Offensive interventions | 125.52 140.88 |
Goals & Assists
| Goals | 79 35 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 69 30 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 2 1 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 11 10 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 8 0 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 0 0 |
| Goals by foot | 56 24 |
| Shots on Goal | 290 186 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 15.26 9.66 |
Goals & Shots conceded
| Goals conceeded | 19 35 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 5 4 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 12 30 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 122 195 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 0.9 1.4 |
Passing and Ball progression
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 5220 4036 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 4210 3094 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 11714 7123 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 274 129 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 152 237 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 359 332 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 55 27 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 662 870 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 1930 2000 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 7513 4313 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 3455 1818 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 202 118 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 3061 1814 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 2419 1504 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 3492 2398 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 2262 1480 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 2528 1923 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 2111 1241 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 93.78 89.53 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 78.96 60.56 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 92.76 79.81 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 61.8 36.49 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 49.35 45.23 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 73.97 68.34 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 85.1 76.51 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 92.2 81.69 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 85.1 74.69 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 55.96 46.27 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 88.18 76.34 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 89.2 80.96 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 87.85 77.93 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 86.98 78.21 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 85.65 72.3 |
Ball contacts & phases of play
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 10964 6282 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1835 1870 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 626 646 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 723 952 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 971 1073 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 714 941 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 410 786 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 564 744 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 1036 1432 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 1287 1696 |
Ball losses
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 209 223 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 777 833 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 73 84 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 156 287 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 297 527 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 28 84 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 34 47 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 233 403 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 338 614 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 636 967 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 605 616 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 159 137 |
| Ball losses total | 1971 2737 |
Ball regains
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 2636 3522 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 159 262 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 523 936 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 1021 1267 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 436 488 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 142 115 |
Defensive
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 566 909 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 556 849 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 189 342 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 177 356 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 625 740 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 268 459 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 541 824 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 293 386 |
| Tackles | 1122 1758 |
| Clearances by foot | 335 579 |
| Ground duels total | 1122 1758 |
| Ground duels won % | 50.45 51.71 |
| Ground duels lost % | 49.55 48.29 |
| Ariel duels total | 366 698 |
| Ariel duels won % | 51.64 49 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 48.36 51 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 418.8 763.3 |
Dribbles
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 886 713 |
| Succesful dribbles | 11054 7850 |
Elimination actions & Pitch
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 360 453 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 850 976 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 2521 1652 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 1260 681 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 596 656 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 2309 1788 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 1665 921 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 446 320 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 1184 935 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 880 587 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 1228 883 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 811 542 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 1002 873 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 513 539 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1985 1473 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1323 723 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 327 255 |
xG
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 58.46 28.86 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 58.46 28.86 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 1.5 1.24 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 6.44 7.24 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 6.24 0 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.77 0.85 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 51.15 28.16 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 6.68 0.7 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.15 0.11 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 44.71 20.92 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 17.54 5.14 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 4.56 2.76 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 52.22 28.86 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.45 -0.7 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.5 -0.24 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 2.56 0.1 |
Comments (0)