Bayer 04 Leverkusen vs Chelsea: Who Wins? Advanced Stats, Prediction & H2H
Who is currently the better team – Bayer 04 Leverkusen or Chelsea? Discover advanced team stats, xG metrics, Expected Threat, full H2H records, pressing & possession profiles, visualised predictions and data-driven performance analytics.
Germany 
Bundesliga 
England 
Premier League 
Analyse Analyse Bayer 04 Leverkusen vs. Chelsea - Who Is Better?
Bayer 04 Leverkusen has a 1vs1 Score of 73.93 while Chelsea has a 1vs1 Score of 76.07, showing which team is performing better this season. View Bayer 04 Leverkusen's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking | View Chelsea's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking
Chelsea has won 811 ground duels versus 553 for Bayer 04 Leverkusen, with Chelsea ranking 4 and Bayer 04 Leverkusen ranking 15 in the league for ground duels won. See Full Ground duels won Ranking
Bayer 04 Leverkusen has accumulated 26.17 expected goals against while Chelsea faces 38.14, with Bayer 04 Leverkusen ranking 3 and Chelsea ranking 14 in the league for xG conceded. See Full Xg total conceeded Ranking
Key Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals  | 39 45 |
| Goals | 1.95 1.8 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 266 329 |
| Shots on Goal | 180 231 |
| Goals conceeded | 26 28 |
| Goals conceeded | 1.3 1.12 |
| Matches won | 11 12 |
| Matches lost | 6 6 |
Scores
To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. Attacking Threat measures a player`s or teams ability to directly impact the game by creating scoring opportunities. It considers actions like dribbling past opponents, winning the ball in dangerous areas, and taking shots on goal. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. Attacking Threat measures a player`s or teams ability to directly impact the game by creating scoring opportunities. It considers actions like dribbling past opponents, winning the ball in dangerous areas, and taking shots on goal. Team Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All Bayer 04 Leverkusen`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Team | Strengths & Weaknesses | Team |
|---|---|---|
| BAY | CHE | |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
Bayer 04 Leverkusen creates 5 clear goal-scoring opportunities compared to Chelsea's 12 - highlighting their ability to fashion high-quality chances
Chelsea records 98 shots that miss the target completely versus Bayer 04 Leverkusen's 86 - showcasing their shooting accuracy variance
Bayer 04 Leverkusen completes 1994 passes from the right flank while Chelsea manages 2079 - exposing their right-sided distribution patterns
Compare Yourself
Bayer 04 Leverkusen Compare Bayer 04 Leverkusen
Search for a team Other Comparisons
Bayer 04 Leverkusen’s and Chelsea’s Total Squad Salary
Salary Stats
#1
Mark Flekken
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Mark Flekken
0
#2
Ibrahim Maza
0
#3
Arthur
0
#4
Claudio Echeverri
0
#5
Christian Kofane
0
#6
Piero Hincapie
0
#7
Jarell Quansah
0
#8
Nathan Tella
0
#9
Ernest Poku
0
#10
Exequiel Palacios
0
#11
Axel Tape
0
#12
Loic Bade
0
#13
Ezequiel Fernandez
0
#14
Eliesse Ben Seghir
0
#15
Jeanuel Belocian
0
#16
Alejo Sarco
0
#17
Montrell Culbreath
0
#18
Janis Blaswich
0
#19
Lucas Vazquez
0
#20
Aleix Garcia
0
#21
Robert Andrich
0
#22
Jonas Hofmann
0
#23
Edmond Tapsoba
1
#24
Martin Terrier
1
#25
Alejandro Grimaldo
1
#26
Patrik Schick
1
#27
Malik Tillman
1
#1
Ibrahim Maza
0
#2
Arthur
0
#3
Claudio Echeverri
0
#4
Christian Kofane
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Ibrahim Maza
0
#2
Arthur
0
#3
Claudio Echeverri
0
#4
Christian Kofane
0
#5
Jarell Quansah
0
#6
Ernest Poku
0
#7
Axel Tape
0
#8
Ezequiel Fernandez
0
#9
Eliesse Ben Seghir
0
#10
Jeanuel Belocian
0
#11
Alejo Sarco
0
#12
Montrell Culbreath
0
#13
Piero Hincapie
1
#14
Exequiel Palacios
1
#15
Lucas Vazquez
1
#16
Janis Blaswich
2
#17
Patrik Schick
3
#18
Alejandro Grimaldo
3
#19
Edmond Tapsoba
4
#20
Martin Terrier
4
#21
Jonas Hofmann
5
#22
Aleix Garcia
5
#23
Nathan Tella
5
#24
Malik Tillman
5
#25
Mark Flekken
5
#26
Loic Bade
6
#27
Robert Andrich
7
#1
Ibrahim Maza
0
#2
Arthur
0
#3
Claudio Echeverri
0
#4
Christian Kofane
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Ibrahim Maza
0
#2
Arthur
0
#3
Claudio Echeverri
0
#4
Christian Kofane
0
#5
Jarell Quansah
0
#6
Ernest Poku
0
#7
Axel Tape
0
#8
Ezequiel Fernandez
0
#9
Eliesse Ben Seghir
0
#10
Jeanuel Belocian
0
#11
Alejo Sarco
0
#12
Montrell Culbreath
0
#13
Janis Blaswich
1
#14
Patrik Schick
1
#15
Exequiel Palacios
2
#16
Piero Hincapie
3
#17
Mark Flekken
4
#18
Martin Terrier
4
#19
Lucas Vazquez
4
#20
Nathan Tella
5
#21
Loic Bade
12
#22
Jonas Hofmann
13
#23
Edmond Tapsoba
13
#24
Malik Tillman
18
#25
Alejandro Grimaldo
21
#26
Robert Andrich
25
#27
Aleix Garcia
38
#1
Patrik Schick
0.94
#2
Malik Tillman
0.82
#3
Alejandro Grimaldo
0.59
#4
Martin Terrier
0.39
No.
Player
Value
#1
Patrik Schick
1
#2
Malik Tillman
1
#3
Alejandro Grimaldo
1
#4
Martin Terrier
0
#5
Nathan Tella
0
#6
Jonas Hofmann
0
#7
Edmond Tapsoba
0
#8
Aleix Garcia
0
#9
Loic Bade
0
#10
Robert Andrich
0
#11
Piero Hincapie
0
#12
Lucas Vazquez
0
#13
Exequiel Palacios
0
#14
Mark Flekken
0
#15
Ibrahim Maza
0
#16
Arthur
0
#17
Claudio Echeverri
0
#18
Christian Kofane
0
#19
Jarell Quansah
0
#20
Ernest Poku
0
#21
Axel Tape
0
#22
Ezequiel Fernandez
0
#23
Eliesse Ben Seghir
0
#24
Jeanuel Belocian
0
#25
Alejo Sarco
0
#26
Montrell Culbreath
0
#27
Janis Blaswich
0
Salary Stats
#1
Jamie Gittens
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jamie Gittens
0
#2
Josh Acheampong
0
#3
Andrey Santos
0
#4
Estevao
0
#5
Robert Sanchez
0
#6
Joao Pedro
0
#7
Jorrel Hato
0
#8
Wesley Fofana
0
#9
Tosin Adarabioyo
0
#10
Tyrique George
0
#11
Facundo Buonanotte
0
#12
Filip Jorgensen
0
#13
Romeo Lavia
0
#14
Benoit Badiashile
0
#15
Marc Guiu
0
#16
Marc Cucurella
0
#17
Reece James
0
#18
Liam Delap
0
#19
Moises Caicedo
0
#20
Alejandro Garnacho
0
#21
Pedro Neto
1
#22
Enzo Fernandez
1
#23
Malo Gusto
1
#24
Cole Palmer
1
#25
Trevoh Chalobah
1
#1
Jamie Gittens
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jamie Gittens
0
#2
Josh Acheampong
0
#3
Estevao
0
#4
Joao Pedro
0
#5
Tyrique George
0
#6
Filip Jorgensen
0
#7
Wesley Fofana
1
#8
Facundo Buonanotte
1
#9
Romeo Lavia
1
#10
Reece James
2
#11
Tosin Adarabioyo
2
#12
Marc Guiu
2
#13
Marc Cucurella
2
#14
Benoit Badiashile
2
#15
Cole Palmer
2
#16
Enzo Fernandez
3
#17
Moises Caicedo
3
#18
Liam Delap
3
#19
Pedro Neto
3
#20
Alejandro Garnacho
6
#21
Robert Sanchez
8
#22
Malo Gusto
9
#23
Trevoh Chalobah
9
#24
Andrey Santos
11
#25
Jorrel Hato
14
#1
Jamie Gittens
0
#2
Josh Acheampong
0
#3
Estevao
0
#4
Joao Pedro
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jamie Gittens
0
#2
Josh Acheampong
0
#3
Estevao
0
#4
Joao Pedro
0
#5
Tyrique George
0
#6
Filip Jorgensen
0
#7
Marc Guiu
1
#8
Romeo Lavia
2
#9
Tosin Adarabioyo
2
#10
Liam Delap
2
#11
Wesley Fofana
2
#12
Benoit Badiashile
3
#13
Facundo Buonanotte
3
#14
Cole Palmer
7
#15
Reece James
8
#16
Robert Sanchez
8
#17
Marc Cucurella
12
#18
Moises Caicedo
13
#19
Jorrel Hato
13
#20
Enzo Fernandez
15
#21
Pedro Neto
19
#22
Andrey Santos
20
#23
Trevoh Chalobah
22
#24
Alejandro Garnacho
28
#25
Malo Gusto
39
#1
Alejandro Garnacho
0.91
#2
Enzo Fernandez
0.87
#3
Andrey Santos
0.78
#4
Cole Palmer
0.59
No.
Player
Value
#1
Alejandro Garnacho
1
#2
Enzo Fernandez
1
#3
Andrey Santos
1
#4
Cole Palmer
1
#5
Marc Guiu
1
#6
Liam Delap
1
#7
Pedro Neto
0
#8
Malo Gusto
0
#9
Trevoh Chalobah
0
#10
Jorrel Hato
0
#11
Moises Caicedo
0
#12
Marc Cucurella
0
#13
Reece James
0
#14
Wesley Fofana
0
#15
Tosin Adarabioyo
0
#16
Jamie Gittens
0
#17
Josh Acheampong
0
#18
Estevao
0
#19
Robert Sanchez
0
#20
Joao Pedro
0
#21
Tyrique George
0
#22
Facundo Buonanotte
0
#23
Filip Jorgensen
0
#24
Romeo Lavia
0
#25
Benoit Badiashile
0
Bayer 04 Leverkusen: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Average Stats
These stats show Bayer 04 Leverkusen`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Bayer 04 Leverkusen`s performance falls below the league average.
#77
Bayer 04 Leverkusen
527
#78
Elche
518
#79
Celta de Vigo
512
#80
Paris FC
505
Chelsea: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where Chelsea is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
#1
Chelsea
1300
#2
Elche
1255
#3
Manchester City
1232
#4
Bayern Munich
1228
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Chelsea consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
Average Stats
These stats show Chelsea`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#20
Chelsea
335
#21
Fulham
325
#22
Tottenham Hotspur
320
#23
Como 1907
319
#20
Chelsea
860
#21
Juventus
860
#22
Aston Villa
854
#23
Getafe
852
Performance per season
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
Bayer 04 Leverkusen has an Expected Threat of 6289.78 - ranking 2 and measuring their ability to advance the ball into dangerous positions, while Chelsea generates 6920.79 Expected Threat - sitting at 4, showing which team better progresses play toward scoring opportunities and controls the attacking tempo. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
Bayer 04 Leverkusen has an Expected Threat against of 351.07 - placing them 17 defensively, indicating how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents, while Chelsea concedes 496.63 Expected Threat against - ranking 18, revealing which defense better restricts opponent advances into threatening areas and maintains defensive solidity. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
Bayer 04 Leverkusen recorded 194 Critical ball losses - ranking 14 in possession security, meaning they've given the ball away in trouble spots, while Chelsea suffered 221 such losses - sitting at 18, highlighting which team is more vulnerable in possession under pressure and prone to dangerous turnovers. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 6289.78 6920.79 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 351.07 496.63 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 194 221 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1279 1410 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.96 0.99 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare Bayer 04 Leverkusen & Chelsea`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Advanced Stats & Analytics
Scores
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 73.93 76.07 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 64.79 69.91 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 72.46 71.05 |
| Offensive interventions | 126.25 129.32 |
Goals & Assists
| Goals | 39 45 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 35 38 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 1 1 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 6 10 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 4 6 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 2 1 |
| Goals by foot | 26 28 |
| Shots on Goal | 180 231 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 10.8 10.54 |
Goals & Shots conceded
| Goals conceeded | 26 28 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 6 8 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 16 20 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 162 189 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 1.3 1.12 |
Passing and Ball progression
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 4467 4614 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 3605 3606 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 9625 9699 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 145 180 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 173 222 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 279 323 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 39 48 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 823 815 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 2202 2462 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 6101 6253 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 2054 2121 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 105 140 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 1994 2079 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 1888 2092 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 3192 3597 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 1963 2094 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 2248 1929 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1279 1410 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 93.37 93.03 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 71.43 58.82 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 90.88 89.47 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 54.17 61.54 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 48.06 43.53 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 72.64 64.84 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 83.85 82.29 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 90.18 88.61 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 82.19 79.68 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 54.97 50.72 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 83.97 80.21 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 86.97 84.44 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 86.79 83.75 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 86.17 83.51 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 82.7 81.24 |
Ball contacts & phases of play
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 9047 8742 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1627 2023 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 383 645 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 660 912 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 940 1087 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 681 933 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 397 583 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 527 655 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 780 1228 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 1187 1567 |
Ball losses
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 194 221 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 684 727 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 58 126 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 187 288 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 353 426 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 28 38 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 33 30 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 310 442 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 424 530 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 664 804 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 445 541 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 86 136 |
| Ball losses total | 1929 2453 |
Ball regains
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 2525 3233 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 196 258 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 693 780 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 880 1192 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 334 425 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 80 121 |
Defensive
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 553 811 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 517 718 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 211 307 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 187 303 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 603 703 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 290 404 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 543 721 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 295 365 |
| Tackles | 1070 1529 |
| Clearances by foot | 393 557 |
| Ground duels total | 1070 1529 |
| Ground duels won % | 51.68 53.04 |
| Ground duels lost % | 48.32 46.96 |
| Ariel duels total | 398 610 |
| Ariel duels won % | 53.02 50.33 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 46.98 49.67 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 457.5 712.1 |
Dribbles
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 713 803 |
| Succesful dribbles | 8937 9702 |
Elimination actions & Pitch
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 487 502 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 991 1030 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 2106 2039 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 690 777 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 739 691 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 2154 2180 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 1042 1075 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 237 335 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 869 833 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 678 782 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 1150 1300 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 760 680 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 871 825 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 627 594 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1844 1856 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 833 808 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 188 247 |
xG
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 36.45 44.65 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 36.45 44.65 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 1.49 1.54 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 4.27 7.44 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 3.12 4.68 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.96 0.99 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 32.39 39.18 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 4.05 5.37 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.14 0.14 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 28.12 31.74 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 1.55 0.35 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 1.73 2.56 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 33.33 39.97 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 1.06 0.31 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.49 -0.54 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.22 3.53 |
Comments (0)