% | Per 90 | Metric | Per 90 | % | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.53%
|
1.17 | Expected Goals (xG) | 1.26 |
33.67%
|
||||||
83.67%
|
51 | Challenges won, % | 51 |
76.53%
|
||||||
42.86%
|
17.57 | Team pressing | 18.11 |
58.16%
|
||||||
62.24%
|
50 | Ball possessions, % | 48 |
38.78%
|
||||||
84.69%
|
18.99 | Passes average length | 18.09 |
56.12%
|
Ruben Diogo Neves
Is Wolverhampton Wanderers better than Clermont Foot 63?
Currently Wolverhampton Wanderers has a better 1vs1 performance index with 87. Wolverhampton Wanderers has 22 goals and Clermont Foot 63 has a total of 27 goals. Our opinion is that currently Wolverhampton Wanderers would win the match.
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better defense?
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better midfield?
Evaluating the strength of a teams midfield is not easy. At 1vs1 we look at a value called Pass Progression Value (PPV). We measure the ability of players to play the pass into dangerous zones and to create chances. Wolverhampton Wanderers has a PPV value of 0.26 and Clermont Foot 63 has a value of 0.2. Within the team of Wolverhampton Wanderers Adama Traore Diarra has a total value of 0.65 and in the team of Clermont Foot 63 the best player is Neto Borges Borges dos Santos Neto.
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better attackers?
Summary
Based on all statistical information we believe that currently Wolverhampton Wanderers is the better team. Please feel free to discuss with us – the comment box is below. We will be happy to reply.