% | Per 90 | Metric | Per 90 | % | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22.45%
|
1.16 | Expected Goals (xG) | 1.26 |
33.67%
|
||||||
37.76%
|
49 | Challenges won, % | 51 |
76.53%
|
||||||
82.65%
|
20.04 | Team pressing | 18.11 |
58.16%
|
||||||
29.59%
|
46 | Ball possessions, % | 48 |
38.78%
|
||||||
81.63%
|
18.88 | Passes average length | 18.09 |
56.12%
|
Mohamed Salisu Abdul Karim
Is Southampton better than Clermont Foot 63?
Currently Southampton has a better 1vs1 performance index with 85. Southampton has 23 goals and Clermont Foot 63 has a total of 27 goals. Our opinion is that currently Southampton would win the match.
Southampton vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better defense?
Southampton vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better midfield?
Evaluating the strength of a teams midfield is not easy. At 1vs1 we look at a value called Pass Progression Value (PPV). We measure the ability of players to play the pass into dangerous zones and to create chances. Southampton has a PPV value of 0.24 and Clermont Foot 63 has a value of 0.2. Within the team of Southampton Stuart Armstrong has a total value of 0.64 and in the team of Clermont Foot 63 the best player is Neto Borges Borges dos Santos Neto.
Southampton vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better attackers?
Summary
Based on all statistical information we believe that currently Southampton is the better team. Please feel free to discuss with us – the comment box is below. We will be happy to reply.