% | Per 90 | Metric | Per 90 | % | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.12%
|
1.03 | Expected Goals (xG) | 1.26 |
33.67%
|
||||||
36.73%
|
49 | Challenges won, % | 51 |
76.53%
|
||||||
60.2%
|
18.85 | Team pressing | 18.11 |
58.16%
|
||||||
40.82%
|
48 | Ball possessions, % | 48 |
38.78%
|
||||||
27.55%
|
17.81 | Passes average length | 18.09 |
56.12%
|
James Maddison
Is Leicester City better than Clermont Foot 63?
Currently Leicester City has a better 1vs1 performance index with 88. Leicester City has 38 goals and Clermont Foot 63 has a total of 27 goals. Our opinion is that currently Leicester City would win the match.
Leicester City vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better defense?
Leicester City vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better midfield?
Evaluating the strength of a teams midfield is not easy. At 1vs1 we look at a value called Pass Progression Value (PPV). We measure the ability of players to play the pass into dangerous zones and to create chances. Leicester City has a PPV value of 0.23 and Clermont Foot 63 has a value of 0.2. Within the team of Leicester City Youri Tielemans has a total value of 0.52 and in the team of Clermont Foot 63 the best player is Neto Borges Borges dos Santos Neto.
Leicester City vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better attackers?
Summary
Based on all statistical information we believe that currently Leicester City is the better team. Please feel free to discuss with us – the comment box is below. We will be happy to reply.