FC Burnley: Team & Player Stats
Last Matches
Next Match Prediction
Trending FC Burnley Team Stats
Best Players by Stat Category
#1
Jaidon Anthony
4
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jaidon Anthony
4
#2
Zian Flemming
3
#3
Lyle Foster
2
#4
Josh Cullen
2
#5
Lesley Ugochukwu
2
#6
Loum Tchaouna
1
#7
Quilindschy Hartman
0
#8
Josh Laurent
0
#9
Kyle Walker
0
#10
Hjalmar Ekdal
0
#11
Marcus Edwards
0
#12
Jacob Bruun Larsen
0
#13
Martin Dubravka
0
#14
Maxime Esteve
0
#15
Hannibal
0
#16
Oliver Sonne
0
#17
Joe Worrall
0
#18
Armando Broja
0
#19
Florentino
0
#20
Bashir Humphreys
0
#21
Axel Tuanzebe
0
#22
Ashley Barnes
0
#23
Lucas Pires
0
#1
Quilindschy Hartman
4
No.
Player
Value
#1
Quilindschy Hartman
4
#2
Hannibal
2
#3
Lyle Foster
1
#4
Kyle Walker
1
#5
Josh Cullen
1
#6
Loum Tchaouna
1
#7
Jacob Bruun Larsen
1
#8
Lesley Ugochukwu
1
#9
Jaidon Anthony
1
#10
Florentino
1
#11
Zian Flemming
0
#12
Josh Laurent
0
#13
Hjalmar Ekdal
0
#14
Marcus Edwards
0
#15
Martin Dubravka
0
#16
Maxime Esteve
0
#17
Oliver Sonne
0
#18
Joe Worrall
0
#19
Armando Broja
0
#20
Bashir Humphreys
0
#21
Axel Tuanzebe
0
#22
Ashley Barnes
0
#23
Lucas Pires
0
#1
Jaidon Anthony
12
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jaidon Anthony
12
#2
Josh Cullen
7
#3
Zian Flemming
6
#4
Lyle Foster
6
#5
Loum Tchaouna
5
#6
Lesley Ugochukwu
5
#7
Josh Laurent
4
#8
Jacob Bruun Larsen
4
#9
Quilindschy Hartman
3
#10
Maxime Esteve
3
#11
Florentino
3
#12
Marcus Edwards
2
#13
Hannibal
2
#14
Kyle Walker
1
#15
Hjalmar Ekdal
1
#16
Martin Dubravka
0
#17
Oliver Sonne
0
#18
Joe Worrall
0
#19
Armando Broja
0
#20
Bashir Humphreys
0
#21
Axel Tuanzebe
0
#22
Ashley Barnes
0
#23
Lucas Pires
0
#1
Quilindschy Hartman
23
No.
Player
Value
#1
Quilindschy Hartman
23
#2
Kyle Walker
20
#3
Josh Cullen
19
#4
Jaidon Anthony
18
#5
Maxime Esteve
17
#6
Axel Tuanzebe
13
#7
Jacob Bruun Larsen
12
#8
Lesley Ugochukwu
12
#9
Florentino
12
#10
Martin Dubravka
9
#11
Loum Tchaouna
7
#12
Hjalmar Ekdal
6
#13
Hannibal
6
#14
Josh Laurent
5
#15
Lyle Foster
4
#16
Marcus Edwards
3
#17
Oliver Sonne
2
#18
Zian Flemming
1
#19
Joe Worrall
0
#20
Armando Broja
0
#21
Bashir Humphreys
0
#22
Ashley Barnes
0
#23
Lucas Pires
0
Scores
Team`s Recent Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All FC Burnley`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Strengths & Weaknesses | Value |
|---|---|
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
Advanced Stats & Analytics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals | 14 |
| Goals Per 90 | 1.27 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 87 |
| Shots on Goal | 65 |
| Goals conceeded | 20 |
| Goals conceeded Per 90 | 1.82 |
| Matches won | 3 |
| Matches lost | 7 |
Compare Yourself
Compare Zian Flemming
Other Teams
Other Team Head-to-Head Comparisons
News
The Premier League's Streak Kings: Why Arsenal and Liverpool Are Unstoppable While Wolves Can't Stop Losing
Arsenal and Liverpool have both won 5 straight games - but one team has lost 11 in a row. Our Simulations reveals the shocking truth about who's really winning and losing the longest streaks in Premier League history this season.
The Defensive Bargain Hunters: How These Premier League Teams Build Fortress Defenses on Shoestring Budgets
While Manchester City and Arsenal spend millions on star defenders, three surprise teams are proving you don't need to break the bank to keep clean sheets. Burnley's defensive setup costs just £0.46 million per goal conceded – that's 33 times cheaper than what the big boys are paying!
The Premier League's Worst Ball Thieves: Chelsea and Newcastle Top the Charts for Critical Mistakes That Cost Points
Chelsea and Newcastle are giving away the ball in the most dangerous situations 97 times each this season – more than any other Premier League team. These aren't just simple mistakes; they're game-changing turnovers that directly lead to opposition chances and dropped points.
Premier League
FC Burnley’s Total Squad Salary
Performance vs. Salary
#1
Jaidon Anthony
2.59
#2
Lyle Foster
1.02
#3
Josh Cullen
0.83
#4
Lesley Ugochukwu
0.72
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jaidon Anthony
3
#2
Lyle Foster
1
#3
Josh Cullen
1
#4
Lesley Ugochukwu
1
#5
Loum Tchaouna
1
#6
Quilindschy Hartman
0
#7
Zian Flemming
0
#8
Josh Laurent
0
#9
Kyle Walker
0
#10
Hjalmar Ekdal
0
#11
Marcus Edwards
0
#12
Jacob Bruun Larsen
0
#13
Martin Dubravka
0
#14
Maxime Esteve
0
#15
Hannibal
0
#16
Oliver Sonne
0
#17
Joe Worrall
0
#18
Armando Broja
0
#19
Florentino
0
#20
Bashir Humphreys
0
#21
Axel Tuanzebe
0
#22
Ashley Barnes
0
#23
Lucas Pires
0
#1
Hannibal
14.54
#2
Jaidon Anthony
12.93
#3
Hjalmar Ekdal
10.78
#4
Jacob Bruun Larsen
10
No.
Player
Value
#1
Hannibal
15
#2
Jaidon Anthony
13
#3
Hjalmar Ekdal
11
#4
Jacob Bruun Larsen
10
#5
Loum Tchaouna
10
#6
Josh Cullen
8
#7
Martin Dubravka
8
#8
Lyle Foster
8
#9
Lesley Ugochukwu
7
#10
Armando Broja
5
#11
Axel Tuanzebe
4
#12
Joe Worrall
2
#13
Kyle Walker
2
#14
Quilindschy Hartman
0
#15
Zian Flemming
0
#16
Josh Laurent
0
#17
Marcus Edwards
0
#18
Maxime Esteve
0
#19
Oliver Sonne
0
#20
Florentino
0
#21
Bashir Humphreys
0
#22
Ashley Barnes
0
#23
Lucas Pires
0
#1
Josh Cullen
24.05
#2
Jaidon Anthony
22.62
#3
Loum Tchaouna
11.35
#4
Jacob Bruun Larsen
11.11
No.
Player
Value
#1
Josh Cullen
24
#2
Jaidon Anthony
23
#3
Loum Tchaouna
11
#4
Jacob Bruun Larsen
11
#5
Hannibal
10
#6
Martin Dubravka
7
#7
Hjalmar Ekdal
7
#8
Lesley Ugochukwu
6
#9
Kyle Walker
6
#10
Axel Tuanzebe
4
#11
Lyle Foster
4
#12
Joe Worrall
0
#13
Armando Broja
0
#14
Quilindschy Hartman
0
#15
Zian Flemming
0
#16
Josh Laurent
0
#17
Marcus Edwards
0
#18
Maxime Esteve
0
#19
Oliver Sonne
0
#20
Florentino
0
#21
Bashir Humphreys
0
#22
Ashley Barnes
0
#23
Lucas Pires
0
#1
Jaidon Anthony
1.07
#2
Lyle Foster
0.79
#3
Lesley Ugochukwu
0.37
#4
Josh Cullen
0.36
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jaidon Anthony
1
#2
Lyle Foster
1
#3
Lesley Ugochukwu
0
#4
Josh Cullen
0
#5
Hjalmar Ekdal
0
#6
Hannibal
0
#7
Loum Tchaouna
0
#8
Jacob Bruun Larsen
0
#9
Quilindschy Hartman
0
#10
Zian Flemming
0
#11
Josh Laurent
0
#12
Kyle Walker
0
#13
Marcus Edwards
0
#14
Martin Dubravka
0
#15
Maxime Esteve
0
#16
Oliver Sonne
0
#17
Joe Worrall
0
#18
Armando Broja
0
#19
Florentino
0
#20
Bashir Humphreys
0
#21
Axel Tuanzebe
0
#22
Ashley Barnes
0
#23
Lucas Pires
0
FC Burnley: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where FC Burnley is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
#1
FC Burnley
571
#2
Everton FC
545
#3
Crystal Palace
539
#4
Leeds United
535
No.
Player
Value
#1
FC Burnley
571
#2
Everton FC
545
#3
Crystal Palace
539
#4
Leeds United
535
#5
Brighton and Hove Albion
516
#6
AFC Sunderland
509
#7
Brentford
507
#8
West Ham United
504
#9
Manchester United
497
#10
Newcastle United
493
#11
Wolverhampton Wanderers
481
#12
Chelsea
479
#13
AFC Bournemouth
474
#14
Fulham
467
#15
Manchester City
466
#16
Nottingham Forrest
456
#17
Tottenham Hotspur
455
#18
Aston Villa
438
#19
Liverpool FC
411
#20
Arsenal FC
410
#1
FC Burnley
158
No.
Player
Value
#1
FC Burnley
158
#2
West Ham United
147
#3
Everton FC
144
#4
Brentford
142
#5
Newcastle United
135
#6
Fulham
131
#7
AFC Sunderland
130
#8
Wolverhampton Wanderers
125
#9
AFC Bournemouth
123
#10
Manchester United
119
#11
Nottingham Forrest
118
#12
Aston Villa
114
#13
Liverpool FC
113
#14
Manchester City
112
#15
Tottenham Hotspur
111
#16
Brighton and Hove Albion
109
#17
Crystal Palace
107
#18
Chelsea
88
#19
Leeds United
80
#20
Arsenal FC
79
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where FC Burnley consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#2
FC Burnley
84
#3
Wolverhampton Wanderers
76
#4
Brighton and Hove Albion
74
#5
Arsenal FC
70
No.
Player
Value
#2
FC Burnley
84
#3
Wolverhampton Wanderers
76
#4
Brighton and Hove Albion
74
#5
Arsenal FC
70
#6
Liverpool FC
68
#7
Chelsea
67
#8
Aston Villa
67
#9
Manchester City
63
#10
AFC Bournemouth
62
#11
Newcastle United
62
#12
Tottenham Hotspur
60
#13
Everton FC
59
#14
Crystal Palace
59
#15
Fulham
58
#16
Leeds United
55
#17
West Ham United
51
#18
AFC Sunderland
44
#19
Brentford
43
#20
Nottingham Forrest
41
#2
FC Burnley
56.34
#3
Chelsea
54.69
#4
Aston Villa
54.02
#5
Manchester City
53.91
No.
Player
Value
#2
FC Burnley
56
#3
Chelsea
55
#4
Aston Villa
54
#5
Manchester City
54
#6
Liverpool FC
54
#7
Nottingham Forrest
54
#8
Brighton and Hove Albion
53
#9
Arsenal FC
52
#10
Fulham
51
#11
Brentford
50
#12
AFC Bournemouth
50
#13
Manchester United
48
#14
Leeds United
47
#15
Wolverhampton Wanderers
47
#16
Crystal Palace
45
#17
West Ham United
45
#18
Newcastle United
44
#19
AFC Sunderland
43
#20
Tottenham Hotspur
42
Average Stats
These stats show FC Burnley`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#17
FC Burnley
211
#18
West Ham United
211
#19
AFC Bournemouth
210
#20
Brentford
190
#17
FC Burnley
40
#18
Leeds United
35
#19
AFC Sunderland
32
#20
West Ham United
31
Weak Stats
These are the areas where FC Burnley`s performance falls below the league average.
#19
FC Burnley
3435
#19
FC Burnley
606
Performance per season
Historical Standings
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat | 1814.94 |
| Expected Threat Against Per 90 | 361.66 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 49 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 398 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.62 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare FC Burnley`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Comprehensive Stats & Advanced Metrics
Scores
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 54.28 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. Per 90 | 51.45 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 56.07 |
| Offensive interventions | 134.18 |
Goals & Assists
| Goals | 14 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. Per 90 | 14 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 1 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 3 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 0 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick Per 90 | 0 |
| Goals by foot | 11 |
| Shots on Goal | 65 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 12.84 |
Goals & Shots conceded
| Goals conceeded | 20 |
| Goals by head conceeded Per 90 | 4 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 13 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 128 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 1.82 |
Passing and Ball progression
| Effectiveness Build up ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 1480 |
| Sense of Space ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed Per 90 | 1188 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 2457 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 84 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 98 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. Per 90 | 87 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 8 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 254 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 724 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 1629 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 525 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 40 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 592 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 515 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 893 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 570 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 602 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 398 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 89.8 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 60 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 63.5 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 36.36 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 42.61 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 49.8 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 74.49 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 80.37 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 69.81 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 56.34 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 72.88 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 79.72 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 72.25 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 74.53 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 68.52 |
Ball contacts & phases of play
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 2014 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". Per 90 | 805 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 201 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 415 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 571 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). Per 90 | 335 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 266 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 319 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 467 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 734 |
Ball losses
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 49 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass Per 90 | 279 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 56 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 132 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 287 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. Per 90 | 50 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 14 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 256 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 248 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 398 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 227 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 31 |
| Ball losses total | 1160 |
Ball regains
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 1476 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box Per 90 | 158 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 454 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 498 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 171 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box Per 90 | 33 |
Defensive
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 303 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. Per 90 | 289 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 160 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 181 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 305 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. Per 90 | 174 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 356 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 209 |
| Tackles | 592 |
| Clearances by foot | 254 |
| Ground duels total | 592 |
| Ground duels won % | 51.18 |
| Ground duels lost % | 48.82 |
| Ariel duels total | 341 |
| Ariel duels won % | 46.92 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 53.08 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 344.7 |
Dribbles
| Progessive dribbles ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 191 |
| Succesful dribbles Per 90 | 2465 |
Elimination actions & Pitch
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 188 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. Per 90 | 390 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 606 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 185 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 278 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch Per 90 | 662 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 323 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 75 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 265 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 211 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 386 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 225 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 297 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 236 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 580 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 274 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 68 |
xG
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 8.7 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. Per 90 | 8.7 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 0.44 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 1.82 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 0 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. Per 90 | 0.62 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 8.25 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 0.45 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.1 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 6.44 |
| Goals total minus Xg total ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 5.3 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 1.18 |
| Goals minus Xg penalty ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.45 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.56 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.32 |
Comments (0)