TSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs RC Strasbourg: Who Wins? Advanced Stats, Prediction & H2H
Who is currently the better team – TSG 1899 Hoffenheim or RC Strasbourg? Discover advanced team stats, xG metrics, Expected Threat, full H2H records, pressing & possession profiles, visualised predictions and data-driven performance analytics.
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs. RC Strasbourg - Who Is Better?
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim has completed 6808 successful passes compared to RC Strasbourg's 8905, with TSG 1899 Hoffenheim ranking 9 and RC Strasbourg ranking 3 in the league for successful passes. See Full Successful passes Ranking
RC Strasbourg has won 507 ground duels versus 472 for TSG 1899 Hoffenheim, with RC Strasbourg ranking 12 and TSG 1899 Hoffenheim ranking 13 in the league for ground duels won. See Full Ground duels won Ranking
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim has accumulated 24.47 expected goals against while RC Strasbourg faces 23.47, with TSG 1899 Hoffenheim ranking 6 and RC Strasbourg ranking 3 in the league for xG conceded. See Full Xg total conceeded Ranking
Key Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals | 35 28 |
| Goals | 2.06 1.56 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 215 206 |
| Shots on Goal | 151 143 |
| Goals conceeded | 21 21 |
| Goals conceeded | 1.24 1.17 |
| Matches won | 10 8 |
| Matches lost | 4 7 |
Scores
Team Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All TSG 1899 Hoffenheim`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Team | Strengths & Weaknesses | Team |
|---|---|---|
| HOF | STR | |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim creates 4 clear goal-scoring opportunities compared to RC Strasbourg's 6 - highlighting their ability to fashion high-quality chances
RC Strasbourg records 63 shots that miss the target completely versus TSG 1899 Hoffenheim's 64 - showcasing their shooting accuracy variance
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim completes 1377 passes from the right flank while RC Strasbourg manages 1799 - exposing their right-sided distribution patterns
Compare Yourself
Compare TSG 1899 Hoffenheim
Other Comparisons
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim’s and RC Strasbourg’s Total Squad Salary
Salary Stats
#1
Oliver Baumann
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Oliver Baumann
0
#2
Umut Tohumcu
0
#3
Kevin Akpoguma
0
#4
Arthur Chaves
0
#5
Leon Avdullahu
0
#6
Koki Machida
0
#7
Bazoumana Toure
0
#8
Alexander Prass
0
#9
Wouter Burger
0
#10
Robin Hranac
0
#11
Tim Lemperle
0
#12
Bernardo
0
#13
Muhammed Damar
0
#14
Max Moerstedt
0
#15
Albian Hajdari
0
#16
Ihlas Bebou
0
#17
Adam Hlozek
0
#18
Valentin Gendrey
0
#19
Vladimir Coufal
0
#20
Ozan Kabak
0
#21
Andrej Kramaric
2
#22
Grischa Promel
4
#23
Fisnik Asllani
5
#1
Umut Tohumcu
0
#2
Arthur Chaves
0
#3
Leon Avdullahu
0
#4
Koki Machida
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Umut Tohumcu
0
#2
Arthur Chaves
0
#3
Leon Avdullahu
0
#4
Koki Machida
0
#5
Bazoumana Toure
0
#6
Wouter Burger
0
#7
Tim Lemperle
0
#8
Bernardo
0
#9
Muhammed Damar
0
#10
Max Moerstedt
0
#11
Albian Hajdari
0
#12
Valentin Gendrey
1
#13
Adam Hlozek
1
#14
Ozan Kabak
2
#15
Kevin Akpoguma
3
#16
Andrej Kramaric
5
#17
Vladimir Coufal
6
#18
Ihlas Bebou
6
#19
Oliver Baumann
6
#20
Alexander Prass
9
#21
Grischa Promel
16
#22
Robin Hranac
16
#23
Fisnik Asllani
18
#1
Umut Tohumcu
0
#2
Arthur Chaves
0
#3
Leon Avdullahu
0
#4
Koki Machida
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Umut Tohumcu
0
#2
Arthur Chaves
0
#3
Leon Avdullahu
0
#4
Koki Machida
0
#5
Bazoumana Toure
0
#6
Wouter Burger
0
#7
Tim Lemperle
0
#8
Bernardo
0
#9
Muhammed Damar
0
#10
Max Moerstedt
0
#11
Albian Hajdari
0
#12
Kevin Akpoguma
1
#13
Adam Hlozek
1
#14
Valentin Gendrey
1
#15
Ozan Kabak
4
#16
Ihlas Bebou
4
#17
Oliver Baumann
8
#18
Andrej Kramaric
16
#19
Alexander Prass
17
#20
Grischa Promel
30
#21
Robin Hranac
35
#22
Vladimir Coufal
44
#23
Fisnik Asllani
45
#1
Fisnik Asllani
4.67
#2
Grischa Promel
2.1
#3
Andrej Kramaric
1.11
#4
Robin Hranac
0.48
No.
Player
Value
#1
Fisnik Asllani
5
#2
Grischa Promel
2
#3
Andrej Kramaric
1
#4
Robin Hranac
0
#5
Ozan Kabak
0
#6
Alexander Prass
0
#7
Vladimir Coufal
0
#8
Adam Hlozek
0
#9
Ihlas Bebou
0
#10
Oliver Baumann
0
#11
Umut Tohumcu
0
#12
Kevin Akpoguma
0
#13
Arthur Chaves
0
#14
Leon Avdullahu
0
#15
Koki Machida
0
#16
Bazoumana Toure
0
#17
Wouter Burger
0
#18
Tim Lemperle
0
#19
Bernardo
0
#20
Muhammed Damar
0
#21
Max Moerstedt
0
#22
Albian Hajdari
0
#23
Valentin Gendrey
0
Salary Stats
#1
Felix Lemarechal
0
#2
Mike Penders
0
#3
Samuel Amo-Ameyaw
0
#4
Abdoul Ouattara
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Felix Lemarechal
0
#2
Mike Penders
0
#3
Samuel Amo-Ameyaw
0
#4
Abdoul Ouattara
0
#5
Junior Mwanga
0
#6
Mamadou Sarr
0
#7
Joaquin Panichelli
0
#8
Lucas Hogsberg
0
#9
Kendry Paez
0
#10
Samir El Mourabet
0
#11
Emanuel Emegha
0
#12
Valentin Barco
0
#13
Diego Moreira
0
#14
Rafael Luis
0
#15
Andrew Omobamidele
0
#16
Ismael Doukoure
0
#17
Karl-Johan Johnsson
0
#18
Mathis Amougou
0
#19
Rabby Nzingoula
0
#20
Martial Godo
0
#21
Ben Chilwell
0
#22
Guela Doue
0
#23
Julio Enciso
0
#24
Abakar Sylla
0
#25
Dilane Bakwa
0
#26
Sebastian Nanasi
2
#1
Felix Lemarechal
0
#2
Mike Penders
0
#3
Samuel Amo-Ameyaw
0
#4
Abdoul Ouattara
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Felix Lemarechal
0
#2
Mike Penders
0
#3
Samuel Amo-Ameyaw
0
#4
Abdoul Ouattara
0
#5
Junior Mwanga
0
#6
Mamadou Sarr
0
#7
Joaquin Panichelli
0
#8
Lucas Hogsberg
0
#9
Kendry Paez
0
#10
Samir El Mourabet
0
#11
Emanuel Emegha
0
#12
Valentin Barco
0
#13
Diego Moreira
0
#14
Rafael Luis
0
#15
Ismael Doukoure
0
#16
Karl-Johan Johnsson
0
#17
Mathis Amougou
0
#18
Rabby Nzingoula
0
#19
Martial Godo
0
#20
Guela Doue
0
#21
Abakar Sylla
0
#22
Dilane Bakwa
1
#23
Ben Chilwell
5
#24
Julio Enciso
5
#25
Sebastian Nanasi
6
#26
Andrew Omobamidele
11
#1
Felix Lemarechal
0
#2
Mike Penders
0
#3
Samuel Amo-Ameyaw
0
#4
Abdoul Ouattara
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Felix Lemarechal
0
#2
Mike Penders
0
#3
Samuel Amo-Ameyaw
0
#4
Abdoul Ouattara
0
#5
Junior Mwanga
0
#6
Mamadou Sarr
0
#7
Joaquin Panichelli
0
#8
Lucas Hogsberg
0
#9
Kendry Paez
0
#10
Samir El Mourabet
0
#11
Emanuel Emegha
0
#12
Valentin Barco
0
#13
Diego Moreira
0
#14
Rafael Luis
0
#15
Ismael Doukoure
0
#16
Karl-Johan Johnsson
0
#17
Mathis Amougou
0
#18
Rabby Nzingoula
0
#19
Martial Godo
0
#20
Guela Doue
0
#21
Abakar Sylla
0
#22
Dilane Bakwa
3
#23
Andrew Omobamidele
6
#24
Ben Chilwell
16
#25
Sebastian Nanasi
17
#26
Julio Enciso
21
#1
Julio Enciso
0.8
#2
Sebastian Nanasi
0.58
#3
Andrew Omobamidele
0.18
#4
Dilane Bakwa
0.03
No.
Player
Value
#1
Julio Enciso
1
#2
Sebastian Nanasi
1
#3
Andrew Omobamidele
0
#4
Dilane Bakwa
0
#5
Ben Chilwell
0
#6
Felix Lemarechal
0
#7
Mike Penders
0
#8
Samuel Amo-Ameyaw
0
#9
Abdoul Ouattara
0
#10
Junior Mwanga
0
#11
Mamadou Sarr
0
#12
Joaquin Panichelli
0
#13
Lucas Hogsberg
0
#14
Kendry Paez
0
#15
Samir El Mourabet
0
#16
Emanuel Emegha
0
#17
Valentin Barco
0
#18
Diego Moreira
0
#19
Rafael Luis
0
#20
Ismael Doukoure
0
#21
Karl-Johan Johnsson
0
#22
Mathis Amougou
0
#23
Rabby Nzingoula
0
#24
Martial Godo
0
#25
Guela Doue
0
#26
Abakar Sylla
0
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where TSG 1899 Hoffenheim consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
Average Stats
These stats show TSG 1899 Hoffenheim`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#47
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim
243
#48
Olympique de Marseille
241
#49
SC Freiburg
241
#50
Torino FC
235
Weak Stats
These are the areas where TSG 1899 Hoffenheim`s performance falls below the league average.
#70
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim
65
#71
Augsburg
65
#72
Real Oviedo
64
#73
West Ham United
64
RC Strasbourg: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where RC Strasbourg is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
#1
RC Strasbourg
3
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where RC Strasbourg consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#2
RC Strasbourg
2261
#3
Como 1907
2171
#4
Napoli
2065
#5
Paris FC
2046
Average Stats
These stats show RC Strasbourg`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
Weak Stats
These are the areas where RC Strasbourg`s performance falls below the league average.
Performance per season
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim has an Expected Threat of 3887.21 - ranking 7 and measuring their ability to advance the ball into dangerous positions, while RC Strasbourg generates 3737.65 Expected Threat - sitting at 8, showing which team better progresses play toward scoring opportunities and controls the attacking tempo. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim has an Expected Threat against of 442.15 - placing them 6 defensively, indicating how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents, while RC Strasbourg concedes 248.27 Expected Threat against - ranking 18, revealing which defense better restricts opponent advances into threatening areas and maintains defensive solidity. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim recorded 126 Critical ball losses - ranking 5 in possession security, meaning they've given the ball away in trouble spots, while RC Strasbourg suffered 200 such losses - sitting at 18, highlighting which team is more vulnerable in possession under pressure and prone to dangerous turnovers. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 3887.21 3737.65 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 442.15 248.27 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 126 200 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1000 969 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.86 0.97 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare TSG 1899 Hoffenheim & RC Strasbourg`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Advanced Stats & Analytics
Scores
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 72.64 74.01 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 65.4 70.43 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 71.14 69.06 |
| Offensive interventions | 154.71 126 |
Goals & Assists
| Goals | 35 28 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 32 30 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 3 0 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 5 7 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 3 3 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 2 0 |
| Goals by foot | 23 21 |
| Shots on Goal | 151 143 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 11.83 11.52 |
Goals & Shots conceded
| Goals conceeded | 21 21 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 1 3 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 18 15 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 137 126 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 1.24 1.17 |
Passing and Ball progression
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 3183 3492 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 2628 2783 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 5254 7414 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 73 79 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 188 146 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 247 239 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 29 21 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 528 770 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 1494 2241 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 3494 4687 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 1227 1151 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 65 56 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 1377 1799 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 982 1519 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 1790 2580 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 1095 1392 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 1564 1615 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1000 969 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 89.78 92.54 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 58.4 64.23 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 81.25 88.85 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 51.79 45.65 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 46.88 48.83 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 65.35 78.41 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 78.18 87.1 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 81.88 88.63 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 72.86 72.94 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 39.39 38.62 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 75.19 80.15 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 80.34 84.62 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 76.59 86.43 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 77.51 87.55 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 77.01 82.3 |
Ball contacts & phases of play
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 4360 6900 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1626 1481 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 399 327 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 841 591 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 778 947 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 709 599 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 570 292 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 594 439 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 969 619 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 1435 1030 |
Ball losses
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 126 200 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 598 598 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 52 44 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 213 153 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 416 239 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 57 30 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 27 25 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 280 212 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 417 332 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 773 601 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 457 427 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 100 89 |
| Ball losses total | 2027 1661 |
Ball regains
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 2630 2268 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 161 166 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 597 550 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 1075 859 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 376 368 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 82 57 |
Defensive
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 472 507 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 469 603 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 276 170 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 246 151 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 565 555 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 242 269 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 659 419 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 330 279 |
| Tackles | 941 1110 |
| Clearances by foot | 431 301 |
| Ground duels total | 941 1110 |
| Ground duels won % | 50.16 45.68 |
| Ground duels lost % | 49.84 54.32 |
| Ariel duels total | 522 321 |
| Ariel duels won % | 52.87 52.96 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 47.13 47.04 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 547.2 231.9 |
Dribbles
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 390 585 |
| Succesful dribbles | 5110 6934 |
Elimination actions & Pitch
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 330 383 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 694 860 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 1433 1574 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 534 523 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 484 618 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 1451 1695 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 757 743 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 243 226 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 689 791 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 345 518 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 697 747 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 467 557 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 831 764 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 435 523 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1271 1421 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 641 573 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 210 191 |
xG
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 28.29 30.12 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 28.29 30.12 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 1.23 0.95 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 4.61 4.18 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 2.34 2.34 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.86 0.97 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 25.29 27.03 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 2.82 3.09 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.13 0.15 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 20.68 22.85 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 4.71 0.88 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.39 2.82 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 25.95 27.78 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 1.52 -0.75 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 1.77 -0.95 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.45 -0.53 |
Comments (0)