SC Freiburg vs Stade Rennais: Who Wins? Advanced Stats, Prediction & H2H
Who is currently the better team – SC Freiburg or Stade Rennais? Discover advanced team stats, xG metrics, Expected Threat, full H2H records, pressing & possession profiles, visualised predictions and data-driven performance analytics.
SC Freiburg vs. Stade Rennais - Who Is Better?
SC Freiburg has a 1vs1 Score of 65.6 while Stade Rennais has a 1vs1 Score of 67.59, showing which team is performing better this season. View SC Freiburg's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking | View Stade Rennais's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking
Stade Rennais has won 656 ground duels versus 543 for SC Freiburg, with Stade Rennais ranking 6 and SC Freiburg ranking 12 in the league for ground duels won. See Full Ground duels won Ranking
SC Freiburg has accumulated 29.56 expected goals against while Stade Rennais faces 29.81, with SC Freiburg ranking 7 and Stade Rennais ranking 10 in the league for xG conceded. See Full Xg total conceeded Ranking
Key Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals | 31 30 |
| Goals | 1.55 1.5 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 241 269 |
| Shots on Goal | 163 182 |
| Goals conceeded | 32 31 |
| Goals conceeded | 1.6 1.55 |
| Matches won | 7 8 |
| Matches lost | 7 5 |
Scores
Team Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All SC Freiburg`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Team | Strengths & Weaknesses | Team |
|---|---|---|
| FRE | REN | |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
SC Freiburg creates 11 clear goal-scoring opportunities compared to Stade Rennais's 9 - highlighting their ability to fashion high-quality chances
Stade Rennais records 87 shots that miss the target completely versus SC Freiburg's 78 - showcasing their shooting accuracy variance
SC Freiburg completes 1507 passes from the right flank while Stade Rennais manages 2046 - exposing their right-sided distribution patterns
Compare Yourself
Compare SC Freiburg
Other Comparisons
SC Freiburg’s and Stade Rennais’s Total Squad Salary
Salary Stats
#1
Derry Scherhant
0
#2
Christian Gunter
0
#3
Johan Manzambi
0
#4
Cyriaque Irie
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Derry Scherhant
0
#2
Christian Gunter
0
#3
Johan Manzambi
0
#4
Cyriaque Irie
0
#5
Philipp Lienhart
0
#6
Noah Atubolu
0
#7
Matthias Ginter
0
#8
Eren Dinkci
0
#9
Yuito Suzuki
0
#10
Merlin Rohl
0
#11
Jordy Makengo
0
#12
Lucas Holer
0
#13
Nicolas Hofler
0
#14
Anthony Jung
0
#15
Philipp Treu
0
#16
Igor Matanovic
0
#17
Niklas Beste
0
#18
Max Rosenfelder
0
#19
Bruno Ogbus
0
#20
Maximilian Eggestein
0
#21
Patrick Osterhage
1
#22
Junior Adamu
1
#23
Lukas Kubler
1
#24
Vincenzo Grifo
1
#1
Derry Scherhant
0
#2
Johan Manzambi
0
#3
Cyriaque Irie
0
#4
Eren Dinkci
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Derry Scherhant
0
#2
Johan Manzambi
0
#3
Cyriaque Irie
0
#4
Eren Dinkci
0
#5
Yuito Suzuki
0
#6
Merlin Rohl
0
#7
Jordy Makengo
0
#8
Lucas Holer
0
#9
Nicolas Hofler
0
#10
Anthony Jung
0
#11
Philipp Treu
0
#12
Igor Matanovic
0
#13
Niklas Beste
0
#14
Max Rosenfelder
0
#15
Bruno Ogbus
0
#16
Philipp Lienhart
4
#17
Matthias Ginter
5
#18
Maximilian Eggestein
7
#19
Vincenzo Grifo
7
#20
Christian Gunter
7
#21
Junior Adamu
12
#22
Patrick Osterhage
12
#23
Lukas Kubler
13
#24
Noah Atubolu
28
#1
Derry Scherhant
0
#2
Johan Manzambi
0
#3
Cyriaque Irie
0
#4
Eren Dinkci
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Derry Scherhant
0
#2
Johan Manzambi
0
#3
Cyriaque Irie
0
#4
Eren Dinkci
0
#5
Yuito Suzuki
0
#6
Merlin Rohl
0
#7
Jordy Makengo
0
#8
Lucas Holer
0
#9
Nicolas Hofler
0
#10
Anthony Jung
0
#11
Philipp Treu
0
#12
Igor Matanovic
0
#13
Niklas Beste
0
#14
Max Rosenfelder
0
#15
Bruno Ogbus
0
#16
Junior Adamu
4
#17
Philipp Lienhart
9
#18
Patrick Osterhage
14
#19
Maximilian Eggestein
14
#20
Matthias Ginter
14
#21
Vincenzo Grifo
18
#22
Christian Gunter
18
#23
Lukas Kubler
32
#24
Noah Atubolu
40
#1
Junior Adamu
1.96
#2
Lukas Kubler
1.24
#3
Vincenzo Grifo
1.04
#4
Maximilian Eggestein
0.54
No.
Player
Value
#1
Junior Adamu
2
#2
Lukas Kubler
1
#3
Vincenzo Grifo
1
#4
Maximilian Eggestein
1
#5
Patrick Osterhage
0
#6
Christian Gunter
0
#7
Matthias Ginter
0
#8
Philipp Lienhart
0
#9
Derry Scherhant
0
#10
Johan Manzambi
0
#11
Cyriaque Irie
0
#12
Noah Atubolu
0
#13
Eren Dinkci
0
#14
Yuito Suzuki
0
#15
Merlin Rohl
0
#16
Jordy Makengo
0
#17
Lucas Holer
0
#18
Nicolas Hofler
0
#19
Anthony Jung
0
#20
Philipp Treu
0
#21
Igor Matanovic
0
#22
Niklas Beste
0
#23
Max Rosenfelder
0
#24
Bruno Ogbus
0
Salary Stats
#1
Ibrahim Salah
0
#2
Jeremy Jacquet
0
#3
Brice Samba
0
#4
Mahamadou Nagida
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Ibrahim Salah
0
#2
Jeremy Jacquet
0
#3
Brice Samba
0
#4
Mahamadou Nagida
0
#5
Abdelhamid Ait Boudlal
0
#6
Mohamed Kader Meite
0
#7
Fabian Rieder
0
#8
Christopher Wooh
0
#9
Quentin Merlin
0
#10
Djaoui Cisse
0
#11
Alidu Seidu
0
#12
Bertug Yildirim
0
#13
Lilian Brassier
0
#14
Mikayil Faye
0
#15
Hans Hateboer
0
#16
Nordan Mukiele
0
#17
Glen Kamara
0
#18
Lucas Rosier
0
#19
Elias Legendre
0
#20
Sebastian Szymanski
0
#21
Seko Fofana
0
#22
Valentin Rongier
0
#23
Przemyslaw Frankowski
0
#24
Mahdi Camara
0
#25
Anthony Rouault
1
#26
Ludovic Blas
1
#27
Mousa Tamari
1
#28
Breel Embolo
1
#29
Esteban Lepaul
3
#1
Jeremy Jacquet
0
#2
Mahamadou Nagida
0
#3
Abdelhamid Ait Boudlal
0
#4
Mohamed Kader Meite
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jeremy Jacquet
0
#2
Mahamadou Nagida
0
#3
Abdelhamid Ait Boudlal
0
#4
Mohamed Kader Meite
0
#5
Christopher Wooh
0
#6
Quentin Merlin
0
#7
Djaoui Cisse
0
#8
Alidu Seidu
0
#9
Bertug Yildirim
0
#10
Nordan Mukiele
0
#11
Lucas Rosier
0
#12
Elias Legendre
0
#13
Sebastian Szymanski
0
#14
Mikayil Faye
1
#15
Glen Kamara
2
#16
Hans Hateboer
3
#17
Fabian Rieder
3
#18
Ibrahim Salah
4
#19
Seko Fofana
4
#20
Breel Embolo
6
#21
Ludovic Blas
6
#22
Brice Samba
6
#23
Valentin Rongier
7
#24
Przemyslaw Frankowski
7
#25
Lilian Brassier
10
#26
Esteban Lepaul
11
#27
Mahdi Camara
11
#28
Mousa Tamari
13
#29
Anthony Rouault
15
#1
Jeremy Jacquet
0
#2
Mahamadou Nagida
0
#3
Abdelhamid Ait Boudlal
0
#4
Mohamed Kader Meite
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jeremy Jacquet
0
#2
Mahamadou Nagida
0
#3
Abdelhamid Ait Boudlal
0
#4
Mohamed Kader Meite
0
#5
Christopher Wooh
0
#6
Quentin Merlin
0
#7
Djaoui Cisse
0
#8
Alidu Seidu
0
#9
Bertug Yildirim
0
#10
Mikayil Faye
0
#11
Nordan Mukiele
0
#12
Lucas Rosier
0
#13
Elias Legendre
0
#14
Sebastian Szymanski
0
#15
Ibrahim Salah
1
#16
Fabian Rieder
1
#17
Glen Kamara
1
#18
Brice Samba
3
#19
Hans Hateboer
3
#20
Breel Embolo
4
#21
Esteban Lepaul
7
#22
Seko Fofana
13
#23
Ludovic Blas
15
#24
Mahdi Camara
32
#25
Valentin Rongier
33
#26
Anthony Rouault
35
#27
Mousa Tamari
36
#28
Lilian Brassier
37
#29
Przemyslaw Frankowski
40
#1
Esteban Lepaul
3.2
#2
Mousa Tamari
1.35
#3
Ludovic Blas
0.96
#4
Breel Embolo
0.63
No.
Player
Value
#1
Esteban Lepaul
3
#2
Mousa Tamari
1
#3
Ludovic Blas
1
#4
Breel Embolo
1
#5
Anthony Rouault
1
#6
Mahdi Camara
0
#7
Seko Fofana
0
#8
Valentin Rongier
0
#9
Przemyslaw Frankowski
0
#10
Lilian Brassier
0
#11
Ibrahim Salah
0
#12
Fabian Rieder
0
#13
Jeremy Jacquet
0
#14
Brice Samba
0
#15
Mahamadou Nagida
0
#16
Abdelhamid Ait Boudlal
0
#17
Mohamed Kader Meite
0
#18
Christopher Wooh
0
#19
Quentin Merlin
0
#20
Djaoui Cisse
0
#21
Alidu Seidu
0
#22
Bertug Yildirim
0
#23
Mikayil Faye
0
#24
Hans Hateboer
0
#25
Nordan Mukiele
0
#26
Glen Kamara
0
#27
Lucas Rosier
0
#28
Elias Legendre
0
#29
Sebastian Szymanski
0
SC Freiburg: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Average Stats
These stats show SC Freiburg`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
Weak Stats
These are the areas where SC Freiburg`s performance falls below the league average.
#85
SC Freiburg
727
#86
Hellas Verona
724
#87
Levante UD
720
#88
Koln
718
#85
SC Freiburg
454
#86
Levante UD
453
#87
Angers SCO
445
#88
Brest
440
Stade Rennais: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Stade Rennais consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
Average Stats
These stats show Stade Rennais`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Stade Rennais`s performance falls below the league average.
Performance per season
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
SC Freiburg has an Expected Threat of 3957.97 - ranking 10 and measuring their ability to advance the ball into dangerous positions, while Stade Rennais generates 4499.31 Expected Threat - sitting at 6, showing which team better progresses play toward scoring opportunities and controls the attacking tempo. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
SC Freiburg has an Expected Threat against of 388.78 - placing them 14 defensively, indicating how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents, while Stade Rennais concedes 364.1 Expected Threat against - ranking 7, revealing which defense better restricts opponent advances into threatening areas and maintains defensive solidity. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
SC Freiburg recorded 140 Critical ball losses - ranking 5 in possession security, meaning they've given the ball away in trouble spots, while Stade Rennais suffered 208 such losses - sitting at 17, highlighting which team is more vulnerable in possession under pressure and prone to dangerous turnovers. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 3957.97 4499.31 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 388.78 364.1 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 140 208 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 882 1195 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.15 1.06 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare SC Freiburg & Stade Rennais`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Advanced Stats & Analytics
Scores
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 65.6 67.59 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 59.07 60.7 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 67.51 68.41 |
| Offensive interventions | 137.9 128.95 |
Goals & Assists
| Goals | 31 30 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 24 26 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 0 0 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 2 7 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 5 3 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 1 0 |
| Goals by foot | 21 21 |
| Shots on Goal | 163 182 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 9.09 8.71 |
Goals & Shots conceded
| Goals conceeded | 32 31 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 7 3 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 25 24 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 177 169 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 1.6 1.55 |
Passing and Ball progression
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 2911 3747 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 2323 2914 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 5626 7020 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 97 137 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 165 161 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 231 318 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 19 40 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 502 699 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 1528 1855 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 3938 4361 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 1159 1761 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 77 91 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 1507 2046 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 1139 1368 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 1765 1966 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 1255 1258 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 1538 2129 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 882 1195 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 91.15 91.42 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 62.18 70.98 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 71.3 85.48 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 34.55 47.62 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 41.25 41.82 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 58.51 69.41 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 76.94 79.82 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 84.11 86.86 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 69.78 77.82 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 44 52.6 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 76.56 79.5 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 81.76 83.42 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 74.79 80.57 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 78.12 83.57 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 75.35 81.03 |
Ball contacts & phases of play
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 5213 6432 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1242 1665 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 352 453 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 898 675 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 848 895 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 644 780 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 615 472 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 676 442 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 967 925 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 1574 1117 |
Ball losses
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 140 208 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 546 659 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 59 56 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 235 224 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 482 339 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 93 54 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 36 44 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 356 308 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 458 469 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 744 660 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 502 502 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 98 82 |
| Ball losses total | 2158 2021 |
Ball regains
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 2758 2579 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 213 228 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 624 639 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 1040 927 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 398 370 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 89 66 |
Defensive
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 543 656 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 512 617 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 306 224 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 301 162 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 571 580 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 280 349 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 650 564 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 330 325 |
| Tackles | 1055 1273 |
| Clearances by foot | 445 400 |
| Ground duels total | 1055 1273 |
| Ground duels won % | 51.47 51.53 |
| Ground duels lost % | 48.53 48.47 |
| Ariel duels total | 607 386 |
| Ariel duels won % | 50.41 58.03 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 49.59 41.97 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 584.1 530.8 |
Dribbles
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 401 691 |
| Succesful dribbles | 5939 6881 |
Elimination actions & Pitch
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 280 377 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 727 938 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 1216 1584 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 454 672 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 455 637 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 1343 1682 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 623 948 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 259 247 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 691 910 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 377 524 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 636 686 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 402 475 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 624 1021 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 385 521 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1166 1375 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 512 744 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 222 202 |
xG
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 33.47 32.89 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 33.47 32.89 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 1.42 1.91 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 4.58 4.37 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 4.68 2.34 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.15 1.06 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 28.05 30.34 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 5.26 2.55 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.14 0.12 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 23.47 25.97 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -4.47 -1.89 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -2.58 2.63 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 28.8 30.55 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.41 -0.22 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -1.42 -1.91 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 2.44 0.62 |
Comments (0)