SC Freiburg vs AFC Bournemouth: Who Wins? Advanced Stats, Prediction & H2H
Who is currently the better team – SC Freiburg or AFC Bournemouth? Discover advanced team stats, xG metrics, Expected Threat, full H2H records, pressing & possession profiles, visualised predictions and data-driven performance analytics.
Germany 
Bundesliga 
England 
Premier League 
Analyse Analyse SC Freiburg vs. AFC Bournemouth - Who Is Better?
SC Freiburg has a 1vs1 Score of 65.26 while AFC Bournemouth has a 1vs1 Score of 65.41, showing which team is performing better this season. View SC Freiburg's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking | View AFC Bournemouth's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking
AFC Bournemouth has won 801 ground duels versus 567 for SC Freiburg, with AFC Bournemouth ranking 4 and SC Freiburg ranking 13 in the league for ground duels won. See Full Ground duels won Ranking
SC Freiburg has accumulated 31 expected goals against while AFC Bournemouth faces 36.44, with SC Freiburg ranking 7 and AFC Bournemouth ranking 9 in the league for xG conceded. See Full Xg total conceeded Ranking
Key Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals  | 32 41 |
| Goals | 1.52 1.64 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 246 343 |
| Shots on Goal | 165 234 |
| Goals conceeded | 32 43 |
| Goals conceeded | 1.52 1.72 |
| Matches won | 8 8 |
| Matches lost | 7 7 |
Scores
To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. Attacking Threat measures a player`s or teams ability to directly impact the game by creating scoring opportunities. It considers actions like dribbling past opponents, winning the ball in dangerous areas, and taking shots on goal. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. Attacking Threat measures a player`s or teams ability to directly impact the game by creating scoring opportunities. It considers actions like dribbling past opponents, winning the ball in dangerous areas, and taking shots on goal. Team Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All SC Freiburg`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Team | Strengths & Weaknesses | Team |
|---|---|---|
| FRE | BOU | |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
SC Freiburg creates 11 clear goal-scoring opportunities compared to AFC Bournemouth's 8 - highlighting their ability to fashion high-quality chances
AFC Bournemouth records 109 shots that miss the target completely versus SC Freiburg's 81 - showcasing their shooting accuracy variance
SC Freiburg completes 1552 passes from the right flank while AFC Bournemouth manages 1562 - exposing their right-sided distribution patterns
Compare Yourself
SC Freiburg Compare SC Freiburg
Search for a team Other Comparisons
SC Freiburg’s and AFC Bournemouth’s Total Squad Salary
Salary Stats
#1
Derry Scherhant
0
#2
Christian Gunter
0
#3
Johan Manzambi
0
#4
Cyriaque Irie
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Derry Scherhant
0
#2
Christian Gunter
0
#3
Johan Manzambi
0
#4
Cyriaque Irie
0
#5
Philipp Lienhart
0
#6
Noah Atubolu
0
#7
Matthias Ginter
0
#8
Eren Dinkci
0
#9
Yuito Suzuki
0
#10
Merlin Rohl
0
#11
Jordy Makengo
0
#12
Lucas Holer
0
#13
Nicolas Hofler
0
#14
Anthony Jung
0
#15
Philipp Treu
0
#16
Igor Matanovic
0
#17
Niklas Beste
0
#18
Max Rosenfelder
0
#19
Bruno Ogbus
0
#20
Maximilian Eggestein
0
#21
Patrick Osterhage
1
#22
Junior Adamu
1
#23
Lukas Kubler
1
#24
Vincenzo Grifo
1
#1
Derry Scherhant
0
#2
Johan Manzambi
0
#3
Cyriaque Irie
0
#4
Eren Dinkci
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Derry Scherhant
0
#2
Johan Manzambi
0
#3
Cyriaque Irie
0
#4
Eren Dinkci
0
#5
Yuito Suzuki
0
#6
Merlin Rohl
0
#7
Jordy Makengo
0
#8
Lucas Holer
0
#9
Nicolas Hofler
0
#10
Anthony Jung
0
#11
Philipp Treu
0
#12
Igor Matanovic
0
#13
Niklas Beste
0
#14
Max Rosenfelder
0
#15
Bruno Ogbus
0
#16
Philipp Lienhart
4
#17
Matthias Ginter
5
#18
Maximilian Eggestein
7
#19
Vincenzo Grifo
7
#20
Christian Gunter
7
#21
Junior Adamu
12
#22
Patrick Osterhage
12
#23
Lukas Kubler
13
#24
Noah Atubolu
28
#1
Derry Scherhant
0
#2
Johan Manzambi
0
#3
Cyriaque Irie
0
#4
Eren Dinkci
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Derry Scherhant
0
#2
Johan Manzambi
0
#3
Cyriaque Irie
0
#4
Eren Dinkci
0
#5
Yuito Suzuki
0
#6
Merlin Rohl
0
#7
Jordy Makengo
0
#8
Lucas Holer
0
#9
Nicolas Hofler
0
#10
Anthony Jung
0
#11
Philipp Treu
0
#12
Igor Matanovic
0
#13
Niklas Beste
0
#14
Max Rosenfelder
0
#15
Bruno Ogbus
0
#16
Junior Adamu
4
#17
Philipp Lienhart
9
#18
Patrick Osterhage
14
#19
Matthias Ginter
15
#20
Maximilian Eggestein
15
#21
Vincenzo Grifo
19
#22
Christian Gunter
20
#23
Lukas Kubler
32
#24
Noah Atubolu
42
#1
Junior Adamu
1.96
#2
Lukas Kubler
1.24
#3
Vincenzo Grifo
1.04
#4
Maximilian Eggestein
0.57
No.
Player
Value
#1
Junior Adamu
2
#2
Lukas Kubler
1
#3
Vincenzo Grifo
1
#4
Maximilian Eggestein
1
#5
Patrick Osterhage
1
#6
Christian Gunter
0
#7
Matthias Ginter
0
#8
Philipp Lienhart
0
#9
Derry Scherhant
0
#10
Johan Manzambi
0
#11
Cyriaque Irie
0
#12
Noah Atubolu
0
#13
Eren Dinkci
0
#14
Yuito Suzuki
0
#15
Merlin Rohl
0
#16
Jordy Makengo
0
#17
Lucas Holer
0
#18
Nicolas Hofler
0
#19
Anthony Jung
0
#20
Philipp Treu
0
#21
Igor Matanovic
0
#22
Niklas Beste
0
#23
Max Rosenfelder
0
#24
Bruno Ogbus
0
Salary Stats
#1
Djordje Petrovic
0
#2
Marcos Senesi
0
#3
Ben Winterburn
0
#4
Hamed Junior Traore
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Djordje Petrovic
0
#2
Marcos Senesi
0
#3
Ben Winterburn
0
#4
Hamed Junior Traore
0
#5
Bafode Diakite
0
#6
Adrien Truffert
0
#7
James Hill
0
#8
Adam Smith
0
#9
Julio Soler
0
#10
Veljko Milosavljevic
0
#11
Lewis Cook
0
#12
Ben Doak
0
#13
Enes Unal
0
#14
Alex Toth
0
#15
Rayan
0
#16
Ryan Christie
0
#17
David Brooks
0
#18
Justin Kluivert
0
#19
Tyler Adams
1
#20
Amine Adli
1
#21
Alex Scott
1
#22
Alex Jimenez
1
#23
Evanilson
1
#24
Marcus Tavernier
1
#25
Antoine Semenyo
2
#26
Eli Junior Kroupi
7
#1
Ben Winterburn
0
#2
James Hill
0
#3
Julio Soler
0
#4
Veljko Milosavljevic
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Ben Winterburn
0
#2
James Hill
0
#3
Julio Soler
0
#4
Veljko Milosavljevic
0
#5
Ben Doak
0
#6
Enes Unal
0
#7
Alex Toth
0
#8
Rayan
0
#9
Hamed Junior Traore
1
#10
Ryan Christie
5
#11
Justin Kluivert
7
#12
Bafode Diakite
7
#13
Tyler Adams
8
#14
Evanilson
8
#15
Lewis Cook
8
#16
Antoine Semenyo
8
#17
Amine Adli
9
#18
Marcus Tavernier
10
#19
Adam Smith
11
#20
Djordje Petrovic
12
#21
David Brooks
12
#22
Marcos Senesi
14
#23
Alex Scott
18
#24
Adrien Truffert
21
#25
Alex Jimenez
32
#26
Eli Junior Kroupi
33
#1
Ben Winterburn
0
#2
Hamed Junior Traore
0
#3
James Hill
0
#4
Julio Soler
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Ben Winterburn
0
#2
Hamed Junior Traore
0
#3
James Hill
0
#4
Julio Soler
0
#5
Veljko Milosavljevic
0
#6
Ben Doak
0
#7
Enes Unal
0
#8
Alex Toth
0
#9
Rayan
0
#10
Djordje Petrovic
4
#11
Evanilson
4
#12
Bafode Diakite
8
#13
Lewis Cook
11
#14
Ryan Christie
11
#15
Adam Smith
11
#16
Amine Adli
12
#17
Justin Kluivert
12
#18
Tyler Adams
13
#19
Eli Junior Kroupi
17
#20
Marcus Tavernier
22
#21
Antoine Semenyo
25
#22
David Brooks
30
#23
Alex Scott
31
#24
Marcos Senesi
58
#25
Adrien Truffert
80
#26
Alex Jimenez
95
#1
Eli Junior Kroupi
3.43
#2
David Brooks
1.9
#3
Evanilson
1.81
#4
Antoine Semenyo
1.41
No.
Player
Value
#1
Eli Junior Kroupi
3
#2
David Brooks
2
#3
Evanilson
2
#4
Antoine Semenyo
1
#5
Marcus Tavernier
1
#6
Alex Jimenez
1
#7
Alex Scott
1
#8
Amine Adli
1
#9
Justin Kluivert
0
#10
Marcos Senesi
0
#11
Ryan Christie
0
#12
Adrien Truffert
0
#13
Tyler Adams
0
#14
Lewis Cook
0
#15
Bafode Diakite
0
#16
Djordje Petrovic
0
#17
Ben Winterburn
0
#18
Hamed Junior Traore
0
#19
James Hill
0
#20
Adam Smith
0
#21
Julio Soler
0
#22
Veljko Milosavljevic
0
#23
Ben Doak
0
#24
Enes Unal
0
#25
Alex Toth
0
#26
Rayan
0
SC Freiburg: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Average Stats
These stats show SC Freiburg`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
Weak Stats
These are the areas where SC Freiburg`s performance falls below the league average.
#82
SC Freiburg
755
#83
Toulouse
738
#84
Bologna FC 1909
738
#85
Borussia Dortmund
733
#82
SC Freiburg
1467
#83
Deportivo Alaves
1449
#84
Borussia Dortmund
1447
#85
Auxerre
1416
AFC Bournemouth: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where AFC Bournemouth is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where AFC Bournemouth consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
Average Stats
These stats show AFC Bournemouth`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#41
AFC Bournemouth
738
#42
Aston Villa
736
#43
Torino FC
731
#44
Getafe
728
Performance per season
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
SC Freiburg has an Expected Threat of 3957.97 - ranking 10 and measuring their ability to advance the ball into dangerous positions, while AFC Bournemouth generates 5069.94 Expected Threat - sitting at 12, showing which team better progresses play toward scoring opportunities and controls the attacking tempo. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
SC Freiburg has an Expected Threat against of 388.78 - placing them 14 defensively, indicating how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents, while AFC Bournemouth concedes 655.35 Expected Threat against - ranking 4, revealing which defense better restricts opponent advances into threatening areas and maintains defensive solidity. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
SC Freiburg recorded 145 Critical ball losses - ranking 4 in possession security, meaning they've given the ball away in trouble spots, while AFC Bournemouth suffered 209 such losses - sitting at 16, highlighting which team is more vulnerable in possession under pressure and prone to dangerous turnovers. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 3957.97 5069.94 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 388.78 655.35 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 145 209 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 924 1297 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.13 1.06 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare SC Freiburg & AFC Bournemouth`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Advanced Stats & Analytics
Scores
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 65.26 65.41 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 59.07 56.88 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 66.18 69.51 |
| Offensive interventions | 139.05 149.24 |
Goals & Assists
| Goals | 32 41 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 25 31 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 0 5 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 2 2 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 5 3 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 1 2 |
| Goals by foot | 22 33 |
| Shots on Goal | 165 234 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 9.17 9.07 |
Goals & Shots conceded
| Goals conceeded | 32 43 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 7 9 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 25 29 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 190 224 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 1.52 1.72 |
Passing and Ball progression
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 3036 3892 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 2423 2928 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 5790 6448 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 104 131 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 169 238 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 242 333 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 20 37 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 522 619 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 1570 1609 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 4037 4310 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 1214 1785 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 79 113 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 1552 1562 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 1164 1245 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 1826 1898 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 1285 1502 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 1595 2229 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 924 1297 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 90.87 90.31 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 63.03 59.01 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 71.18 83.25 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 34.48 36.27 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 40.63 41.98 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 57.17 59.4 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 76.32 72.54 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 83.95 81.12 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 69.65 74.19 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 43.65 43.8 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 76.32 76.76 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 81.33 76.79 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 73.96 72.28 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 77.86 76.62 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 75.01 73.47 |
Ball contacts & phases of play
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 5330 5571 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1303 1960 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 383 510 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 933 971 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 912 1078 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 684 1037 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 649 858 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 704 794 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 1032 1368 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 1637 1765 |
Ball losses
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 145 209 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 582 692 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 61 91 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 247 329 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 512 589 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 98 67 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 38 65 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 391 423 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 487 609 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 772 1003 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 529 621 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 102 145 |
| Ball losses total | 2281 2801 |
Ball regains
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 2920 3731 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 225 323 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 696 910 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 1077 1344 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 422 523 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 94 130 |
Defensive
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 567 801 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 534 836 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 323 366 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 318 422 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 614 815 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 292 440 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 690 850 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 358 479 |
| Tackles | 1101 1637 |
| Clearances by foot | 461 626 |
| Ground duels total | 1101 1637 |
| Ground duels won % | 51.5 48.93 |
| Ground duels lost % | 48.5 51.07 |
| Ariel duels total | 641 788 |
| Ariel duels won % | 50.39 46.45 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 49.61 53.55 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 621.3 644.9 |
Dribbles
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 418 740 |
| Succesful dribbles | 6118 7139 |
Elimination actions & Pitch
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 300 436 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 755 818 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 1258 1695 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 479 659 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 483 534 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 1387 1697 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 658 955 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 266 342 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 721 747 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 389 454 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 671 813 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 414 652 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 653 1010 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 407 448 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1205 1379 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 543 738 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 226 265 |
xG
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 33.93 43.38 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 33.93 43.38 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 1.48 2.36 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 4.67 5.4 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 4.68 3.12 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.13 1.06 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 28.5 39.13 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 5.26 4.25 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.14 0.13 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 23.84 33.73 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -3.93 -2.38 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -2.67 -3.4 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 29.25 40.26 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.41 0.91 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -1.48 2.64 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 2.44 1 |
Comments (0)