RB Leipzig vs Torino FC: Who Wins? Advanced Stats, Prediction & H2H
Who is currently the better team – RB Leipzig or Torino FC? Discover advanced team stats, xG metrics, Expected Threat, full H2H records, pressing & possession profiles, visualised predictions and data-driven performance analytics.
RB Leipzig vs. Torino FC - Who Is Better?
RB Leipzig has a 1vs1 Score of 74.11 while Torino FC has a 1vs1 Score of 59.51, showing which team is performing better this season. View RB Leipzig's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking | View Torino FC's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking
Torino FC has won 745 ground duels versus 713 for RB Leipzig, with Torino FC ranking 4 and RB Leipzig ranking 1 in the league for ground duels won. See Full Ground duels won Ranking
RB Leipzig has accumulated 29.16 expected goals against while Torino FC faces 36.54, with RB Leipzig ranking 5 and Torino FC ranking 16 in the league for xG conceded. See Full Xg total conceeded Ranking
Key Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals | 38 22 |
| Goals | 1.9 0.96 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 320 264 |
| Shots on Goal | 220 178 |
| Goals conceeded | 27 40 |
| Goals conceeded | 1.35 1.74 |
| Matches won | 11 7 |
| Matches lost | 6 11 |
Scores
Team Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All RB Leipzig`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Team | Strengths & Weaknesses | Team |
|---|---|---|
| LEI | TOR | |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
RB Leipzig creates 8 clear goal-scoring opportunities compared to Torino FC's 4 - highlighting their ability to fashion high-quality chances
Torino FC records 86 shots that miss the target completely versus RB Leipzig's 100 - showcasing their shooting accuracy variance
RB Leipzig completes 1846 passes from the right flank while Torino FC manages 1544 - exposing their right-sided distribution patterns
Compare Yourself
Compare RB Leipzig
Other Comparisons
RB Leipzig’s and Torino FC’s Total Squad Salary
Salary Stats
#1
Romulo
0
#2
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#3
Peter Gulacsi
0
#4
Yan Diomande
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Romulo
0
#2
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#3
Peter Gulacsi
0
#4
Yan Diomande
0
#5
Lois Openda
0
#6
Nicolas Seiwald
0
#7
Xavi Simons
0
#8
Johan Bakayoko
0
#9
Kosta Nedeljkovic
0
#10
Kevin Kampl
0
#11
Conrad Harder
0
#12
Andrija Maksimovic
0
#13
Timo Werner
0
#14
Lukas Klostermann
0
#15
El Chadaille Bitshiabu
0
#16
Tidiam Gomis
0
#17
Max Finkgrafe
0
#18
Samba Konate
0
#19
Benjamin Henrichs
0
#20
Willi Orban
0
#21
Castello Lukeba
0
#22
Ridle Baku
0
#23
David Raum
0
#24
Xaver Schlager
1
#25
Antonio Nusa
1
#26
Christoph Baumgartner
1
#27
Assan Ouedraogo
2
#1
Romulo
0
#2
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#3
Yan Diomande
0
#4
Johan Bakayoko
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Romulo
0
#2
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#3
Yan Diomande
0
#4
Johan Bakayoko
0
#5
Kosta Nedeljkovic
0
#6
Conrad Harder
0
#7
Andrija Maksimovic
0
#8
Tidiam Gomis
0
#9
Max Finkgrafe
0
#10
Samba Konate
0
#11
Benjamin Henrichs
0
#12
Kevin Kampl
0
#13
Xavi Simons
1
#14
Timo Werner
1
#15
Lois Openda
1
#16
Lukas Klostermann
1
#17
David Raum
4
#18
Castello Lukeba
4
#19
El Chadaille Bitshiabu
4
#20
Willi Orban
5
#21
Peter Gulacsi
5
#22
Xaver Schlager
6
#23
Christoph Baumgartner
6
#24
Ridle Baku
6
#25
Nicolas Seiwald
8
#26
Assan Ouedraogo
11
#27
Antonio Nusa
13
#1
Romulo
0
#2
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#3
Yan Diomande
0
#4
Johan Bakayoko
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Romulo
0
#2
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#3
Yan Diomande
0
#4
Johan Bakayoko
0
#5
Kosta Nedeljkovic
0
#6
Kevin Kampl
0
#7
Conrad Harder
0
#8
Andrija Maksimovic
0
#9
Tidiam Gomis
0
#10
Max Finkgrafe
0
#11
Samba Konate
0
#12
Lois Openda
0
#13
Xavi Simons
0
#14
Lukas Klostermann
0
#15
Timo Werner
0
#16
Peter Gulacsi
1
#17
Benjamin Henrichs
2
#18
El Chadaille Bitshiabu
4
#19
Willi Orban
12
#20
Castello Lukeba
14
#21
Christoph Baumgartner
14
#22
Xaver Schlager
18
#23
Nicolas Seiwald
18
#24
Assan Ouedraogo
29
#25
David Raum
30
#26
Ridle Baku
40
#27
Antonio Nusa
69
#1
Antonio Nusa
2.56
#2
Assan Ouedraogo
1.59
#3
Christoph Baumgartner
1.38
#4
Xaver Schlager
0.39
No.
Player
Value
#1
Antonio Nusa
3
#2
Assan Ouedraogo
2
#3
Christoph Baumgartner
1
#4
Xaver Schlager
0
#5
Ridle Baku
0
#6
Nicolas Seiwald
0
#7
David Raum
0
#8
Willi Orban
0
#9
Castello Lukeba
0
#10
El Chadaille Bitshiabu
0
#11
Lois Openda
0
#12
Romulo
0
#13
Ezechiel Banzuzi
0
#14
Peter Gulacsi
0
#15
Yan Diomande
0
#16
Xavi Simons
0
#17
Johan Bakayoko
0
#18
Kosta Nedeljkovic
0
#19
Kevin Kampl
0
#20
Conrad Harder
0
#21
Andrija Maksimovic
0
#22
Timo Werner
0
#23
Lukas Klostermann
0
#24
Tidiam Gomis
0
#25
Max Finkgrafe
0
#26
Samba Konate
0
#27
Benjamin Henrichs
0
Salary Stats
#1
Emirhan Ilkhan
0
#2
Gvidas Gineitis
0
#3
Cristiano Biraghi
0
#4
Adrien Tameze
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Emirhan Ilkhan
0
#2
Gvidas Gineitis
0
#3
Cristiano Biraghi
0
#4
Adrien Tameze
0
#5
Tino Anjorin
0
#6
Adam Masina
0
#7
Zakaria Aboukhlal
0
#8
Marcus Pedersen
0
#9
Franco Israel
0
#10
Cyril Ngonge
0
#11
Valentino Lazaro
0
#12
Kristjan Asllani
0
#13
Ivan Ilic
0
#14
Ardian Ismajli
0
#15
Niels Nkounkou
0
#16
Alieu Njie
0
#17
Ali Dembele
0
#18
Alberto Paleari
0
#19
Rafa Obrador
0
#20
Matteo Prati
0
#21
Luca Marianucci
0
#22
Sandro Kulenovic
0
#23
Duvan Zapata
0
#24
Guillermo Maripan
0
#25
Saul Coco
1
#26
Cesare Casadei
1
#27
Che Adams
1
#28
Giovanni Simeone
2
#29
Nikola Vlasic
2
#1
Emirhan Ilkhan
0
#2
Tino Anjorin
0
#3
Marcus Pedersen
0
#4
Franco Israel
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Emirhan Ilkhan
0
#2
Tino Anjorin
0
#3
Marcus Pedersen
0
#4
Franco Israel
0
#5
Cyril Ngonge
0
#6
Kristjan Asllani
0
#7
Niels Nkounkou
0
#8
Alieu Njie
0
#9
Ali Dembele
0
#10
Alberto Paleari
0
#11
Rafa Obrador
0
#12
Matteo Prati
0
#13
Luca Marianucci
0
#14
Sandro Kulenovic
0
#15
Ivan Ilic
3
#16
Cristiano Biraghi
5
#17
Duvan Zapata
6
#18
Giovanni Simeone
7
#19
Ardian Ismajli
10
#20
Guillermo Maripan
10
#21
Che Adams
11
#22
Cesare Casadei
13
#23
Zakaria Aboukhlal
14
#24
Adam Masina
14
#25
Nikola Vlasic
16
#26
Gvidas Gineitis
16
#27
Saul Coco
20
#28
Valentino Lazaro
21
#29
Adrien Tameze
31
#1
Emirhan Ilkhan
0
#2
Tino Anjorin
0
#3
Marcus Pedersen
0
#4
Franco Israel
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Emirhan Ilkhan
0
#2
Tino Anjorin
0
#3
Marcus Pedersen
0
#4
Franco Israel
0
#5
Cyril Ngonge
0
#6
Kristjan Asllani
0
#7
Niels Nkounkou
0
#8
Alieu Njie
0
#9
Ali Dembele
0
#10
Alberto Paleari
0
#11
Rafa Obrador
0
#12
Matteo Prati
0
#13
Sandro Kulenovic
0
#14
Luca Marianucci
2
#15
Duvan Zapata
2
#16
Adam Masina
5
#17
Giovanni Simeone
9
#18
Zakaria Aboukhlal
14
#19
Cristiano Biraghi
15
#20
Che Adams
16
#21
Guillermo Maripan
17
#22
Ivan Ilic
18
#23
Ardian Ismajli
20
#24
Cesare Casadei
22
#25
Saul Coco
28
#26
Gvidas Gineitis
28
#27
Adrien Tameze
41
#28
Nikola Vlasic
44
#29
Valentino Lazaro
75
#1
Giovanni Simeone
1.73
#2
Nikola Vlasic
1.58
#3
Che Adams
1.53
#4
Cesare Casadei
1.06
No.
Player
Value
#1
Giovanni Simeone
2
#2
Nikola Vlasic
2
#3
Che Adams
2
#4
Cesare Casadei
1
#5
Duvan Zapata
1
#6
Guillermo Maripan
1
#7
Saul Coco
0
#8
Valentino Lazaro
0
#9
Zakaria Aboukhlal
0
#10
Ardian Ismajli
0
#11
Adrien Tameze
0
#12
Gvidas Gineitis
0
#13
Cristiano Biraghi
0
#14
Emirhan Ilkhan
0
#15
Tino Anjorin
0
#16
Adam Masina
0
#17
Marcus Pedersen
0
#18
Franco Israel
0
#19
Cyril Ngonge
0
#20
Kristjan Asllani
0
#21
Ivan Ilic
0
#22
Niels Nkounkou
0
#23
Alieu Njie
0
#24
Ali Dembele
0
#25
Alberto Paleari
0
#26
Rafa Obrador
0
#27
Matteo Prati
0
#28
Luca Marianucci
0
#29
Sandro Kulenovic
0
RB Leipzig: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where RB Leipzig consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#3
RB Leipzig
3
Average Stats
These stats show RB Leipzig`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
Weak Stats
These are the areas where RB Leipzig`s performance falls below the league average.
Torino FC: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Average Stats
These stats show Torino FC`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#63
Torino FC
487
#64
FC St. Pauli
479
#65
Brentford
473
#66
Augsburg
470
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Torino FC`s performance falls below the league average.
#81
Torino FC
3364
#82
Espanyol
3358
#83
Nantes
3262
#84
Genua CFC
3241
Performance per season
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
RB Leipzig has an Expected Threat of 5268.65 - ranking 5 and measuring their ability to advance the ball into dangerous positions, while Torino FC generates 3890.36 Expected Threat - sitting at 12, showing which team better progresses play toward scoring opportunities and controls the attacking tempo. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
RB Leipzig has an Expected Threat against of 407.08 - placing them 11 defensively, indicating how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents, while Torino FC concedes 449.47 Expected Threat against - ranking 9, revealing which defense better restricts opponent advances into threatening areas and maintains defensive solidity. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
RB Leipzig recorded 182 Critical ball losses - ranking 11 in possession security, meaning they've given the ball away in trouble spots, while Torino FC suffered 156 such losses - sitting at 7, highlighting which team is more vulnerable in possession under pressure and prone to dangerous turnovers. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 5268.65 3890.36 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 407.08 449.47 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 182 156 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1260 1152 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.06 1.47 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare RB Leipzig & Torino FC`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Advanced Stats & Analytics
Scores
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 74.11 59.51 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 64.25 58.43 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 73.84 58.52 |
| Offensive interventions | 144.75 136.13 |
Goals & Assists
| Goals | 38 22 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 33 18 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 1 1 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 5 3 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 1 3 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 1 0 |
| Goals by foot | 30 15 |
| Shots on Goal | 220 178 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 8.81 6 |
Goals & Shots conceded
| Goals conceeded | 27 40 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 4 6 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 21 30 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 160 192 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 1.35 1.74 |
Passing and Ball progression
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 3872 3454 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 2939 2720 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 7193 5259 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 110 119 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 191 200 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 271 295 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 45 19 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 766 576 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 2012 1667 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 4619 3570 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 1447 1188 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 128 92 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 1846 1544 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 1399 1168 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 2339 1781 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 1634 1203 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 1754 1397 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1260 1152 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 90.77 89.33 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 67.48 62.63 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 86.86 84.05 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 56.96 37.25 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 44.94 41.58 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 73.65 61.6 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 80.48 73.86 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 85.84 81.34 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 75.44 68.95 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 52.67 52.57 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 77.17 73.37 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 81.09 77.31 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 82.21 74.61 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 82.98 75.79 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 81.57 73.84 |
Ball contacts & phases of play
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 6646 4658 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1628 1610 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 400 422 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 841 999 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 948 1090 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 850 772 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 516 584 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 603 710 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 916 1006 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 1444 1709 |
Ball losses
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 182 156 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 731 628 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 53 71 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 234 281 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 350 481 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 41 56 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 34 32 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 274 359 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 488 590 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 762 819 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 471 535 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 115 83 |
| Ball losses total | 2110 2386 |
Ball regains
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 2895 3131 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 227 248 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 735 808 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 1065 1163 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 377 382 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 90 88 |
Defensive
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 713 745 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 650 715 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 242 359 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 235 370 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 636 714 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 312 381 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 606 696 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 393 381 |
| Tackles | 1363 1460 |
| Clearances by foot | 468 532 |
| Ground duels total | 1363 1460 |
| Ground duels won % | 52.31 51.03 |
| Ground duels lost % | 47.69 48.97 |
| Ariel duels total | 477 729 |
| Ariel duels won % | 50.73 49.25 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 49.27 50.75 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 645.9 710.7 |
Dribbles
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 750 511 |
| Succesful dribbles | 7625 5923 |
Elimination actions & Pitch
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 312 318 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 976 841 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 1684 1461 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 648 583 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 640 487 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 1729 1540 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 912 893 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 348 259 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 887 799 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 506 487 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 743 725 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 646 466 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 920 777 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 508 397 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1447 1315 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 689 731 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 243 214 |
xG
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 39.1 30.78 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 39.1 30.78 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 1.04 1.95 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 4.46 5.9 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 1.56 3.9 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.06 1.47 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 36.38 26.59 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 2.39 4.2 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.12 0.12 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 31.92 20.68 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -2.1 -9.78 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.54 -2.9 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 37.55 26.89 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.17 -0.3 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.04 -0.95 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.21 -0.61 |
Comments (0)