Newcastle United vs Brentford: Who Wins? Advanced Stats, Prediction & H2H
Who is currently the better team – Newcastle United or Brentford? Discover advanced team stats, xG metrics, Expected Threat, full H2H records, pressing & possession profiles, visualised predictions and data-driven performance analytics.
England 
Premier League England Premier League 
Analyse Analyse Head to Head Matches
Next Encounter Prediction
Newcastle United vs. Brentford - Who Is Better?
Newcastle United has a 1vs1 Score of 70.38 while Brentford has a 1vs1 Score of 68.27, showing which team is performing better this season. View Newcastle United's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking | View Brentford's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking
Brentford has won 611 ground duels versus 743 for Newcastle United, with Brentford ranking 20 and Newcastle United ranking 11 in the league for ground duels won. See Full Ground duels won Ranking
Newcastle United has accumulated 29.32 expected goals against while Brentford faces 36.95, with Newcastle United ranking 2 and Brentford ranking 14 in the league for xG conceded. See Full Xg total conceeded Ranking
Key Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals  | 33 36 |
| Goals | 1.38 1.5 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 308 238 |
| Shots on Goal | 225 163 |
| Goals conceeded | 31 30 |
| Goals conceeded | 1.29 1.25 |
| Matches won | 9 11 |
| Matches lost | 9 10 |
Scores
To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. Attacking Threat measures a player`s or teams ability to directly impact the game by creating scoring opportunities. It considers actions like dribbling past opponents, winning the ball in dangerous areas, and taking shots on goal. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. Attacking Threat measures a player`s or teams ability to directly impact the game by creating scoring opportunities. It considers actions like dribbling past opponents, winning the ball in dangerous areas, and taking shots on goal. Team Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All Newcastle United`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Team | Strengths & Weaknesses | Team |
|---|---|---|
| NEW | BRE | |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
Newcastle United creates 3 clear goal-scoring opportunities compared to Brentford's 6 - highlighting their ability to fashion high-quality chances
Brentford records 75 shots that miss the target completely versus Newcastle United's 83 - showcasing their shooting accuracy variance
Newcastle United completes 2318 passes from the right flank while Brentford manages 1781 - exposing their right-sided distribution patterns
Compare Yourself
Newcastle United Compare Newcastle United
Search for a team Other Comparisons
Match Prediction
Newcastle United’s and Brentford’s Total Squad Salary
Salary Stats
#1
Lewis Miley
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Lewis Miley
0
#2
Dan Burn
0
#3
Sandro Tonali
0
#4
Tino Livramento
0
#5
Anthony Elanga
0
#6
Kieran Trippier
0
#7
Fabian Schar
0
#8
Nick Pope
0
#9
Lewis Hall
0
#10
Jacob Ramsey
0
#11
Sven Botman
0
#12
Joe Willock
0
#13
Jamaal Lascelles
0
#14
Emil Krafth
0
#15
Aaron Ramsdale
0
#16
Alex Murphy
0
#17
Yoane Wissa
0
#18
Joelinton
0
#19
Anthony Gordon
0
#20
Malick Thiaw
1
#21
William Osula
1
#22
Bruno Guimaraes
1
#23
Harvey Barnes
1
#24
Nick Woltemade
1
#25
Jacob Murphy
1
#1
Lewis Miley
0
#2
Lewis Hall
0
#3
Alex Murphy
0
#4
Emil Krafth
0.62
No.
Player
Value
#1
Lewis Miley
0
#2
Lewis Hall
0
#3
Alex Murphy
0
#4
Emil Krafth
1
#5
Jamaal Lascelles
1
#6
Aaron Ramsdale
1
#7
Yoane Wissa
2
#8
Kieran Trippier
2
#9
Bruno Guimaraes
3
#10
Joelinton
3
#11
Sven Botman
3
#12
Anthony Gordon
3
#13
Joe Willock
3
#14
Sandro Tonali
4
#15
Jacob Ramsey
4
#16
Nick Woltemade
4
#17
Fabian Schar
4
#18
Tino Livramento
4
#19
Anthony Elanga
4
#20
Dan Burn
5
#21
Harvey Barnes
6
#22
Nick Pope
7
#23
Malick Thiaw
7
#24
Jacob Murphy
12
#25
William Osula
12
#1
Lewis Miley
0
#2
Lewis Hall
0
#3
Jamaal Lascelles
0
#4
Alex Murphy
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Lewis Miley
0
#2
Lewis Hall
0
#3
Jamaal Lascelles
0
#4
Alex Murphy
0
#5
Aaron Ramsdale
0
#6
Yoane Wissa
0
#7
William Osula
1
#8
Emil Krafth
1
#9
Nick Pope
2
#10
Nick Woltemade
2
#11
Sven Botman
2
#12
Joe Willock
4
#13
Jacob Ramsey
6
#14
Joelinton
8
#15
Anthony Elanga
12
#16
Dan Burn
12
#17
Fabian Schar
12
#18
Anthony Gordon
13
#19
Sandro Tonali
14
#20
Malick Thiaw
15
#21
Bruno Guimaraes
18
#22
Harvey Barnes
19
#23
Kieran Trippier
22
#24
Tino Livramento
29
#25
Jacob Murphy
52
#1
Jacob Murphy
1.49
#2
Harvey Barnes
0.87
#3
Nick Woltemade
0.84
#4
Anthony Gordon
0.53
No.
Player
Value
#1
Jacob Murphy
1
#2
Harvey Barnes
1
#3
Nick Woltemade
1
#4
Anthony Gordon
1
#5
William Osula
0
#6
Bruno Guimaraes
0
#7
Malick Thiaw
0
#8
Yoane Wissa
0
#9
Fabian Schar
0
#10
Joelinton
0
#11
Anthony Elanga
0
#12
Sandro Tonali
0
#13
Joe Willock
0
#14
Dan Burn
0
#15
Jacob Ramsey
0
#16
Kieran Trippier
0
#17
Sven Botman
0
#18
Tino Livramento
0
#19
Lewis Miley
0
#20
Nick Pope
0
#21
Lewis Hall
0
#22
Jamaal Lascelles
0
#23
Emil Krafth
0
#24
Aaron Ramsdale
0
#25
Alex Murphy
0
Salary Stats
#1
Antoni Milambo
0
#2
Jordan Henderson
0
#3
Michael Kayode
0
#4
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Antoni Milambo
0
#2
Jordan Henderson
0
#3
Michael Kayode
0
#4
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
#5
Rico Henry
0
#6
Caoimhin Kelleher
0
#7
Sepp van den Berg
0
#8
Aaron Hickey
0
#9
Kevin Schade
0
#10
Frank Onyeka
0
#11
Kristoffer Ajer
0
#12
Ethan Pinnock
0
#13
Vitaly Janelt
0
#14
Reiss Nelson
0
#15
Myles Peart-Harris
0
#16
Romelle Donovan
0
#17
Mikkel Damsgaard
0
#18
Fabio Carvalho
0
#19
Nathan Collins
1
#20
Mathias Jensen
1
#21
Keane Lewis-Potter
1
#22
Dango Ouattara
2
#23
Igor Thiago
5
#1
Antoni Milambo
0
#2
Jordan Henderson
0
#3
Michael Kayode
0
#4
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Antoni Milambo
0
#2
Jordan Henderson
0
#3
Michael Kayode
0
#4
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
#5
Kevin Schade
0
#6
Myles Peart-Harris
0
#7
Romelle Donovan
0
#8
Reiss Nelson
2
#9
Ethan Pinnock
3
#10
Frank Onyeka
4
#11
Fabio Carvalho
5
#12
Aaron Hickey
5
#13
Mikkel Damsgaard
6
#14
Mathias Jensen
9
#15
Caoimhin Kelleher
9
#16
Kristoffer Ajer
9
#17
Keane Lewis-Potter
10
#18
Igor Thiago
10
#19
Dango Ouattara
11
#20
Vitaly Janelt
12
#21
Rico Henry
13
#22
Nathan Collins
17
#23
Sepp van den Berg
21
#1
Antoni Milambo
0
#2
Jordan Henderson
0
#3
Michael Kayode
0
#4
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Antoni Milambo
0
#2
Jordan Henderson
0
#3
Michael Kayode
0
#4
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
#5
Kevin Schade
0
#6
Myles Peart-Harris
0
#7
Romelle Donovan
0
#8
Fabio Carvalho
2
#9
Frank Onyeka
3
#10
Ethan Pinnock
4
#11
Reiss Nelson
6
#12
Aaron Hickey
7
#13
Caoimhin Kelleher
10
#14
Igor Thiago
12
#15
Kristoffer Ajer
16
#16
Keane Lewis-Potter
16
#17
Rico Henry
24
#18
Mathias Jensen
27
#19
Mikkel Damsgaard
27
#20
Dango Ouattara
28
#21
Sepp van den Berg
31
#22
Nathan Collins
36
#23
Vitaly Janelt
49
#1
Igor Thiago
4.82
#2
Dango Ouattara
1.72
#3
Sepp van den Berg
1.25
#4
Keane Lewis-Potter
0.61
No.
Player
Value
#1
Igor Thiago
5
#2
Dango Ouattara
2
#3
Sepp van den Berg
1
#4
Keane Lewis-Potter
1
#5
Mathias Jensen
0
#6
Nathan Collins
0
#7
Fabio Carvalho
0
#8
Vitaly Janelt
0
#9
Mikkel Damsgaard
0
#10
Kristoffer Ajer
0
#11
Reiss Nelson
0
#12
Rico Henry
0
#13
Aaron Hickey
0
#14
Antoni Milambo
0
#15
Jordan Henderson
0
#16
Michael Kayode
0
#17
Yegor Yarmolyuk
0
#18
Caoimhin Kelleher
0
#19
Kevin Schade
0
#20
Frank Onyeka
0
#21
Ethan Pinnock
0
#22
Myles Peart-Harris
0
#23
Romelle Donovan
0
Newcastle United: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Newcastle United consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#2
Newcastle United
1062
#3
Liverpool FC
988
#4
West Ham United
959
#5
Brighton and Hove Albion
955
#2
Newcastle United
2318
#3
Liverpool FC
2313
#4
Chelsea
1994
#5
Arsenal FC
1918
Average Stats
These stats show Newcastle United`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Newcastle United`s performance falls below the league average.
Brentford: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where Brentford is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
#1
Brentford
1097
#2
Everton FC
1074
#3
Manchester United
1073
#4
Leeds United
1059
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Brentford consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#2
Brentford
494
#3
Chelsea
486
#4
Fulham
473
#5
Brighton and Hove Albion
460
Average Stats
These stats show Brentford`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#13
Brentford
781
#14
Everton FC
772
#15
Aston Villa
733
#16
Crystal Palace
713
#13
Brentford
828
#14
Leeds United
825
#15
Crystal Palace
793
#16
AFC Bournemouth
777
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Brentford`s performance falls below the league average.
#18
Brentford
566
Performance per season
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
Newcastle United has an Expected Threat of 6293.59 - ranking 5 and measuring their ability to advance the ball into dangerous positions, while Brentford generates 4155.47 Expected Threat - sitting at 17, showing which team better progresses play toward scoring opportunities and controls the attacking tempo. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
Newcastle United has an Expected Threat against of 560.12 - placing them 11 defensively, indicating how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents, while Brentford concedes 627.63 Expected Threat against - ranking 5, revealing which defense better restricts opponent advances into threatening areas and maintains defensive solidity. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
Newcastle United recorded 233 Critical ball losses - ranking 20 in possession security, meaning they've given the ball away in trouble spots, while Brentford suffered 186 such losses - sitting at 11, highlighting which team is more vulnerable in possession under pressure and prone to dangerous turnovers. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 6293.59 4155.47 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 560.12 627.63 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 233 186 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1450 1087 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.11 1.08 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare Newcastle United & Brentford`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Advanced Stats & Analytics
Scores
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 70.38 68.27 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 67.65 63.05 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 65.28 66.66 |
| Offensive interventions | 138.33 143.54 |
Goals & Assists
| Goals | 33 36 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 25 28 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 1 1 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 7 5 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 4 5 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 0 0 |
| Goals by foot | 21 25 |
| Shots on Goal | 225 163 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 8.44 11.18 |
Goals & Shots conceded
| Goals conceeded | 31 30 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 6 7 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 21 20 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 180 222 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 1.29 1.25 |
Passing and Ball progression
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 4312 3567 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 3495 2786 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 7706 5995 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 133 108 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 189 184 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 345 265 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 42 33 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 595 711 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 1916 1898 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 4917 3880 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 2075 1218 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 121 108 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 2318 1781 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 1639 1232 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 2231 1924 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 1523 1268 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 1913 1610 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1450 1087 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 91.36 89.01 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 63.03 59.02 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 86.9 72.4 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 41.18 44.59 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 42.95 45.77 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 59.26 59.75 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 79.34 76.66 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 84.69 80.48 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 76.77 67.33 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 46.36 44.26 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 76.77 72.1 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 81.57 77.32 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 77.71 71.44 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 80.66 76.95 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 79.19 75.05 |
Ball contacts & phases of play
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 6744 5079 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1976 1762 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 610 478 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 880 1097 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 1033 1087 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 946 886 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 692 797 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 673 706 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 1302 1275 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 1553 1803 |
Ball losses
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 233 186 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 729 740 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 78 75 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 251 218 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 550 641 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 52 101 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 60 41 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 409 479 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 499 578 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 889 941 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 628 591 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 140 136 |
| Ball losses total | 2565 2725 |
Ball regains
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 3320 3445 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 278 321 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 736 883 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 1275 1238 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 467 462 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 109 102 |
Defensive
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 743 611 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 742 691 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 367 373 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 292 354 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 656 765 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 337 300 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 829 909 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 412 447 |
| Tackles | 1485 1302 |
| Clearances by foot | 476 441 |
| Ground duels total | 1485 1302 |
| Ground duels won % | 50.03 46.93 |
| Ground duels lost % | 49.97 53.07 |
| Ariel duels total | 659 727 |
| Ariel duels won % | 55.69 51.31 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 44.31 48.69 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 650.3 567.7 |
Dribbles
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 653 566 |
| Succesful dribbles | 7966 6305 |
Elimination actions & Pitch
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 389 494 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 915 851 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 1962 1437 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 831 526 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 589 628 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 1985 1503 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 1111 803 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 339 284 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 1062 781 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 655 448 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 911 828 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 621 514 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 912 795 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 500 524 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1709 1273 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 897 635 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 294 248 |
xG
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 36.51 37.67 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 36.51 37.67 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 1.36 0.84 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 6.15 7.3 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 3.12 5.46 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.11 1.08 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 32.97 31.84 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 3.54 5.84 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.12 0.16 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 26.82 24.53 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -3.51 -2.67 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 0.85 -2.3 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 33.4 32.22 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.38 -0.38 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.36 0.16 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -4.1 -0.47 |
Comments (0)