% | Per 90 | Metric | Per 90 | % | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.82%
|
2.12 | Expected Goals (xG) | 1.26 |
33.67%
|
||||||
35.71%
|
49 | Challenges won, % | 51 |
76.53%
|
||||||
15.31%
|
17.08 | Team pressing | 18.11 |
58.16%
|
||||||
90.82%
|
58 | Ball possessions, % | 48 |
38.78%
|
||||||
21.43%
|
18.22 | Passes average length | 18.09 |
56.12%
|
Virgil van Dijk
Is Liverpool FC better than Clermont Foot 63?
Currently Liverpool FC has a better 1vs1 performance index with 94. Liverpool FC has 47 goals and Clermont Foot 63 has a total of 27 goals. Our opinion is that currently Liverpool FC would win the match.
Liverpool FC vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better defense?
Liverpool FC vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better midfield?
Evaluating the strength of a teams midfield is not easy. At 1vs1 we look at a value called Pass Progression Value (PPV). We measure the ability of players to play the pass into dangerous zones and to create chances. Liverpool FC has a PPV value of 0.34 and Clermont Foot 63 has a value of 0.2. Within the team of Liverpool FC Trent Alexander Arnold has a total value of 0.95 and in the team of Clermont Foot 63 the best player is Neto Borges Borges dos Santos Neto.
Liverpool FC vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better attackers?
Summary
Based on all statistical information we believe that currently Liverpool FC is the better team. Please feel free to discuss with us – the comment box is below. We will be happy to reply.