Lens: Team & Player Stats
Last Matches
Next Match Prediction
Trending Lens Team Stats
Lens has a defensive stability rating of 564.4, earning 4 spot in the league for defensive stability. See Full Defensive stability Ranking
Lens scores from 33.85 expected goals in open play, ranking 4 in the league for open play xG. See Full Open play Xg Ranking
Lens has made 48.49% successful tackles, placing them 6 in the league for tackle success rate. See Full Tackles lost % Ranking
Best Players by Stat Category
#1
Wesley Said
8
No.
Player
Value
#1
Wesley Said
8
#2
Odsonne Edouard
7
#3
Florian Thauvin
5
#4
Rayan Fofana
3
#5
Samson Baidoo
2
#6
Adrien Thomasson
2
#7
Ismaelo Ganiou
2
#8
Ruben Aguilar
1
#9
Morgan Guilavogui
1
#10
Mamadou Sangare
1
#11
Abdallah Sima
1
#12
Robin Risser
0
#13
Anthony Bermont
0
#14
Matthieu Udol
0
#15
Malang Sarr
0
#16
Deiver Machado
0
#17
Florian Sotoca
0
#18
Saud Abdulhamid
0
#19
Andy Diouf
0
#20
Andrija Bulatovic
0
#21
Fode Sylla
0
#22
Jonathan Gradit
0
#23
Kyllian Antonio
0
#1
Adrien Thomasson
7
No.
Player
Value
#1
Adrien Thomasson
7
#2
Matthieu Udol
7
#3
Mamadou Sangare
3
#4
Wesley Said
2
#5
Rayan Fofana
2
#6
Florian Thauvin
2
#7
Ruben Aguilar
2
#8
Odsonne Edouard
2
#9
Samson Baidoo
1
#10
Malang Sarr
1
#11
Saud Abdulhamid
1
#12
Andrija Bulatovic
1
#13
Robin Risser
0
#14
Anthony Bermont
0
#15
Deiver Machado
0
#16
Florian Sotoca
0
#17
Andy Diouf
0
#18
Morgan Guilavogui
0
#19
Fode Sylla
0
#20
Jonathan Gradit
0
#21
Abdallah Sima
0
#22
Ismaelo Ganiou
0
#23
Kyllian Antonio
0
#1
Florian Thauvin
28
No.
Player
Value
#1
Florian Thauvin
28
#2
Wesley Said
23
#3
Mamadou Sangare
20
#4
Adrien Thomasson
18
#5
Odsonne Edouard
18
#6
Rayan Fofana
17
#7
Matthieu Udol
14
#8
Samson Baidoo
9
#9
Abdallah Sima
6
#10
Malang Sarr
5
#11
Ruben Aguilar
5
#12
Andrija Bulatovic
5
#13
Deiver Machado
3
#14
Saud Abdulhamid
3
#15
Morgan Guilavogui
3
#16
Ismaelo Ganiou
3
#17
Florian Sotoca
2
#18
Anthony Bermont
1
#19
Andy Diouf
1
#20
Jonathan Gradit
1
#21
Kyllian Antonio
1
#22
Robin Risser
0
#23
Fode Sylla
0
#1
Matthieu Udol
96
#2
Ruben Aguilar
78
#3
Mamadou Sangare
73
#4
Florian Thauvin
68
No.
Player
Value
#1
Matthieu Udol
96
#2
Ruben Aguilar
78
#3
Mamadou Sangare
73
#4
Florian Thauvin
68
#5
Malang Sarr
57
#6
Samson Baidoo
40
#7
Adrien Thomasson
37
#8
Ismaelo Ganiou
34
#9
Wesley Said
32
#10
Jonathan Gradit
29
#11
Robin Risser
18
#12
Anthony Bermont
12
#13
Saud Abdulhamid
12
#14
Kyllian Antonio
11
#15
Abdallah Sima
9
#16
Deiver Machado
8
#17
Morgan Guilavogui
8
#18
Fode Sylla
6
#19
Odsonne Edouard
5
#20
Rayan Fofana
4
#21
Andrija Bulatovic
4
#22
Florian Sotoca
3
#23
Andy Diouf
3
Scores
Team`s Recent Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All Lens`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Strengths & Weaknesses | Value |
|---|---|
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
| | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
Lens completes 153 diagonal passes across the pitch while losing possession through 56 failed diagonal attempts - revealing their ambition in switching play
Lens records 683 offensive actions from central areas compared to 903 from the left wing - highlighting their tactical preferences
Lens manages 87 ball recoveries in the opponent's penalty area but suffers 113 possession losses in the same zone - showcasing their high-risk approach
Advanced Stats & Analytics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals | 34 |
| Passing accuracy % | 79.97 |
| Goals conceeded | 16 |
| Tackles | 1355 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 274 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 37.41 |
Compare Yourself
Compare Rayan Fofana
Other Teams
Other Team Head-to-Head Comparisons
News
Money and Modern Football: Metz Just Humiliated PSG With 1/30th The Budget—And The Math Will Make You Question Everything
While PSG burns €600 millions on superstars, a French minnow is scoring 30 times more goals per euro spent and it's not even close. The efficiency gap is so enormous it's exposing football's mega-clubs as the worst investors in sports history.
Ligue 1
Lens’s Total Squad Salary
Performance vs. Salary
#1
Samson Baidoo
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Samson Baidoo
0
#2
Robin Risser
0
#3
Anthony Bermont
0
#4
Rayan Fofana
0
#5
Matthieu Udol
0
#6
Malang Sarr
0
#7
Deiver Machado
0
#8
Florian Sotoca
0
#9
Saud Abdulhamid
0
#10
Andy Diouf
0
#11
Morgan Guilavogui
0
#12
Andrija Bulatovic
0
#13
Fode Sylla
0
#14
Jonathan Gradit
0
#15
Mamadou Sangare
0
#16
Ismaelo Ganiou
0
#17
Kyllian Antonio
0
#18
Ruben Aguilar
0
#19
Adrien Thomasson
1
#20
Abdallah Sima
1
#21
Florian Thauvin
2
#22
Odsonne Edouard
2
#23
Wesley Said
4
#1
Samson Baidoo
0
#2
Robin Risser
0
#3
Anthony Bermont
0
#4
Rayan Fofana
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Samson Baidoo
0
#2
Robin Risser
0
#3
Anthony Bermont
0
#4
Rayan Fofana
0
#5
Matthieu Udol
0
#6
Andy Diouf
0
#7
Morgan Guilavogui
0
#8
Andrija Bulatovic
0
#9
Fode Sylla
0
#10
Mamadou Sangare
0
#11
Ismaelo Ganiou
0
#12
Kyllian Antonio
0
#13
Deiver Machado
3
#14
Jonathan Gradit
3
#15
Odsonne Edouard
4
#16
Florian Thauvin
5
#17
Adrien Thomasson
5
#18
Florian Sotoca
5
#19
Malang Sarr
6
#20
Saud Abdulhamid
6
#21
Ruben Aguilar
7
#22
Wesley Said
8
#23
Abdallah Sima
9
#1
Samson Baidoo
0
#2
Robin Risser
0
#3
Anthony Bermont
0
#4
Rayan Fofana
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Samson Baidoo
0
#2
Robin Risser
0
#3
Anthony Bermont
0
#4
Rayan Fofana
0
#5
Matthieu Udol
0
#6
Andy Diouf
0
#7
Morgan Guilavogui
0
#8
Andrija Bulatovic
0
#9
Fode Sylla
0
#10
Mamadou Sangare
0
#11
Ismaelo Ganiou
0
#12
Kyllian Antonio
0
#13
Odsonne Edouard
5
#14
Florian Sotoca
5
#15
Deiver Machado
7
#16
Abdallah Sima
7
#17
Jonathan Gradit
12
#18
Saud Abdulhamid
25
#19
Malang Sarr
34
#20
Adrien Thomasson
38
#21
Wesley Said
39
#22
Florian Thauvin
54
#23
Ruben Aguilar
70
#1
Wesley Said
2.96
#2
Florian Thauvin
2.24
#3
Odsonne Edouard
1.47
#4
Adrien Thomasson
1.32
No.
Player
Value
#1
Wesley Said
3
#2
Florian Thauvin
2
#3
Odsonne Edouard
1
#4
Adrien Thomasson
1
#5
Abdallah Sima
0
#6
Malang Sarr
0
#7
Deiver Machado
0
#8
Ruben Aguilar
0
#9
Saud Abdulhamid
0
#10
Jonathan Gradit
0
#11
Florian Sotoca
0
#12
Samson Baidoo
0
#13
Robin Risser
0
#14
Anthony Bermont
0
#15
Rayan Fofana
0
#16
Matthieu Udol
0
#17
Andy Diouf
0
#18
Morgan Guilavogui
0
#19
Andrija Bulatovic
0
#20
Fode Sylla
0
#21
Mamadou Sangare
0
#22
Ismaelo Ganiou
0
#23
Kyllian Antonio
0
Lens: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where Lens is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
#1
Lens
1923
#2
Lorient
1748
#3
Monaco
1705
#4
LOSC Lille
1691
No.
Player
Value
#1
Lens
1923
#2
Lorient
1748
#3
Monaco
1705
#4
LOSC Lille
1691
#5
Paris Saint-Germain
1678
#6
Paris FC
1675
#7
Stade Rennais
1665
#8
Auxerre
1664
#9
Angers SCO
1660
#10
Olympique de Marseille
1654
#11
Le Havre AC
1643
#12
RC Strasbourg
1635
#13
Nice
1585
#14
Toulouse
1513
#15
Brest
1508
#16
FC Metz
1452
#17
Olympique Lyonnais
1426
#18
Nantes
1320
#1
Lens
688
No.
Player
Value
#1
Lens
688
#2
Monaco
686
#3
Brest
661
#4
Auxerre
647
#5
Toulouse
632
#6
Le Havre AC
623
#7
Angers SCO
618
#8
Lorient
613
#9
RC Strasbourg
611
#10
Nice
604
#11
Paris Saint-Germain
601
#12
Nantes
598
#13
Paris FC
595
#14
LOSC Lille
591
#15
Stade Rennais
580
#16
Olympique Lyonnais
575
#17
Olympique de Marseille
559
#18
FC Metz
559
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Lens consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#2
Lens
3070
#3
Paris FC
3060
#4
RC Strasbourg
3048
#5
Monaco
3045
No.
Player
Value
#2
Lens
3070
#3
Paris FC
3060
#4
RC Strasbourg
3048
#5
Monaco
3045
#6
Olympique de Marseille
3029
#7
LOSC Lille
2941
#8
Stade Rennais
2914
#9
Olympique Lyonnais
2824
#10
FC Metz
2757
#11
Nice
2692
#12
Angers SCO
2670
#13
Lorient
2618
#14
Le Havre AC
2521
#15
Auxerre
2399
#16
Nantes
2354
#17
Toulouse
2277
#18
Brest
2175
#2
Lens
698
No.
Player
Value
#2
Lens
698
#3
Angers SCO
670
#4
Monaco
664
#5
Auxerre
659
#6
Stade Rennais
656
#7
Brest
622
#8
Lorient
604
#9
Nice
603
#10
FC Metz
582
#11
Toulouse
582
#12
LOSC Lille
575
#13
RC Strasbourg
568
#14
Nantes
563
#15
Paris FC
563
#16
Paris Saint-Germain
546
#17
Olympique de Marseille
518
#18
Olympique Lyonnais
501
Average Stats
These stats show Lens`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#6
Lens
968
#7
Stade Rennais
938
#8
Lorient
916
#9
LOSC Lille
877
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Lens`s performance falls below the league average.
#10
Lens
8138
#10
Lens
8591
Performance per season
Historical Standings
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
Lens has an Expected Threat of 4385.49 - ranking 7 in this metric, basically how well they advance the ball into dangerous positions and create goal-scoring opportunities through progressive play. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
Lens has an Expected Threat against of 349.38 - placing them 10 in defensive stability, showing how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents and how well they restrict threatening advances into their own half. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
Lens recorded 183 Critical ball losses - ranking 10 in this area, basically how many times they've given the ball away in spots that immediately put them in trouble and expose their defense to counter-attacks. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 4385.49 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 349.38 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 183 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1155 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.13 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare Lens`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Comprehensive Stats & Advanced Metrics
Scores Lens
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 79.36 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 77.66 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 71.82 |
| Offensive interventions | 133.55 |
Goals & Assists Lens
| Goals | 34 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 31 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 0 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 8 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 3 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 0 |
| Goals by foot | 22 |
| Shots on Goal | 186 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 9.12 |
Goals & Shots conceded Lens
| Goals conceeded | 16 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 2 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 12 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 156 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 0.8 |
Passing and Ball progression Lens
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 3847 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 3070 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 6326 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 153 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 183 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 279 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 42 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 625 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 1790 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 4167 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 1460 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 96 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 2036 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 1262 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 1861 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 1317 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 1662 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1155 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 89.6 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 73.21 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 90.58 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 56.76 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 46.92 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 68.61 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 79.7 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 85.48 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 75.45 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 45.93 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 77.34 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 83.14 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 79.6 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 80.18 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 80.44 |
Ball contacts & phases of play Lens
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 5494 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1923 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 485 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 689 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 1016 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 729 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 490 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 447 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 975 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 1136 |
Ball losses Lens
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 183 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 734 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 56 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 207 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 324 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 29 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 32 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 286 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 456 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 708 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 475 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 113 |
| Ball losses total | 2038 |
Ball regains Lens
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 2671 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 193 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 698 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 975 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 356 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 87 |
Defensive Lens
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 698 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 657 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 204 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 200 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 688 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 366 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 524 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 342 |
| Tackles | 1355 |
| Clearances by foot | 432 |
| Ground duels total | 1355 |
| Ground duels won % | 51.51 |
| Ground duels lost % | 48.49 |
| Ariel duels total | 404 |
| Ariel duels won % | 50.5 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 49.5 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 564.4 |
Dribbles Lens
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 648 |
| Succesful dribbles | 6419 |
Elimination actions & Pitch Lens
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 346 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 968 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 1687 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 678 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 628 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 1859 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 872 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 283 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 1074 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 541 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 683 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 533 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 903 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 510 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1559 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 702 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 236 |
xG Lens
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 37.41 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 37.41 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 1.34 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 5.99 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 3.12 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 1.13 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 33.85 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 3.56 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.14 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 27.86 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -4.41 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 2.01 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 34.29 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.44 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -1.34 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.01 |
Comments (0)