% | Per 90 | Metric | Per 90 | % | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13.27%
|
1.11 | Expected Goals (xG) | 1.26 |
33.67%
|
||||||
44.9%
|
50 | Challenges won, % | 51 |
76.53%
|
||||||
77.55%
|
20.56 | Team pressing | 18.11 |
58.16%
|
||||||
10.2%
|
44 | Ball possessions, % | 48 |
38.78%
|
||||||
96.94%
|
20.55 | Passes average length | 18.09 |
56.12%
|
Neto Borges Borges dos Santos Neto
Is Hellas Verona better than Clermont Foot 63?
Currently Clermont Foot 63 has a better 1vs1 performance index with 83. Hellas Verona has 22 goals and Clermont Foot 63 has a total of 27 goals. Our opinion is that currently Clermont Foot 63 would win the match.
Hellas Verona vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better defense?
Hellas Verona vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better midfield?
Evaluating the strength of a teams midfield is not easy. At 1vs1 we look at a value called Pass Progression Value (PPV). We measure the ability of players to play the pass into dangerous zones and to create chances. Hellas Verona has a PPV value of 0.26 and Clermont Foot 63 has a value of 0.2. Within the team of Hellas Verona Simone Verdi has a total value of 0.7 and in the team of Clermont Foot 63 the best player is Neto Borges Borges dos Santos Neto.
Hellas Verona vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better attackers?
Summary
Based on all statistical information we believe that currently Clermont Foot 63 is the better team. Please feel free to discuss with us – the comment box is below. We will be happy to reply.