Eintracht Frankfurt vs Werder Bremen: Who Wins? Advanced Stats, Prediction & H2H
Who is currently the better team – Eintracht Frankfurt or Werder Bremen? Discover advanced team stats, xG metrics, Expected Threat, full H2H records, pressing & possession profiles, visualised predictions and data-driven performance analytics.
Germany 
Bundesliga Germany Bundesliga 
Analyse Analyse Head to Head Matches
Eintracht Frankfurt vs. Werder Bremen - Who Is Better?
Eintracht Frankfurt has a 1vs1 Score of 61.87 while Werder Bremen has a 1vs1 Score of 55.6, showing which team is performing better this season. View Eintracht Frankfurt's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking | View Werder Bremen's Position in 1vs1 Best Team Ranking
Werder Bremen has won 640 ground duels versus 623 for Eintracht Frankfurt, with Werder Bremen ranking 4 and Eintracht Frankfurt ranking 6 in the league for ground duels won. See Full Ground duels won Ranking
Eintracht Frankfurt has accumulated 33.53 expected goals against while Werder Bremen faces 34.71, with Eintracht Frankfurt ranking 12 and Werder Bremen ranking 14 in the league for xG conceded. See Full Xg total conceeded Ranking
Key Stats
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Goals  | 40 22 |
| Goals | 2 1.1 |
| Shot at goal number ⓘ Number of shots. | 230 265 |
| Shots on Goal | 159 181 |
| Goals conceeded | 44 37 |
| Goals conceeded | 2.2 1.85 |
| Matches won | 7 4 |
| Matches lost | 7 9 |
Scores
To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. Attacking Threat measures a player`s or teams ability to directly impact the game by creating scoring opportunities. It considers actions like dribbling past opponents, winning the ball in dangerous areas, and taking shots on goal. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. Attacking Threat measures a player`s or teams ability to directly impact the game by creating scoring opportunities. It considers actions like dribbling past opponents, winning the ball in dangerous areas, and taking shots on goal. Team Form
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
All Eintracht Frankfurt`s shots on this match:
Strengths & Weaknesses
| Team | Strengths & Weaknesses | Team |
|---|---|---|
| EIN | WER | |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
| 0 | | 0 |
Up To Date Stats
Eintracht Frankfurt creates 7 clear goal-scoring opportunities compared to Werder Bremen's 4 - highlighting their ability to fashion high-quality chances
Werder Bremen records 84 shots that miss the target completely versus Eintracht Frankfurt's 71 - showcasing their shooting accuracy variance
Eintracht Frankfurt completes 2054 passes from the right flank while Werder Bremen manages 1634 - exposing their right-sided distribution patterns
Compare Yourself
Eintracht Frankfurt Compare Eintracht Frankfurt
Search for a team Other Comparisons
Eintracht Frankfurt’s and Werder Bremen’s Total Squad Salary
Salary Stats
#1
Can Uzun
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Can Uzun
0
#2
Nnamdi Collins
0
#3
Fares Chaibi
0
#4
Oscar Hojlund
0
#5
Michael Zetterer
0
#6
Jean-Matteo Bahoya
0
#7
Mario Gotze
0
#8
Elye Wahi
0
#9
Ansgar Knauff
0
#10
Aurelio Buta
0
#11
Kaua Santos
0
#12
Aurele Amenda
0
#13
Ellyes Skhiri
0
#14
Jessic Ngankam
0
#15
Elias Baum
0
#16
Younes Ebnoutalib
0
#17
Ayoube Amaimouni-Echghouyab
0
#18
Arthur Theate
0
#19
Michy Batshuayi
0
#20
Rasmus Kristensen
0
#21
Robin Koch
1
#22
Hugo Larsson
1
#23
Arnaud Kalimuendo
1
#24
Mahmoud Dahoud
1
#25
Ritsu Doan
1
#26
Nathaniel Brown
1
#27
Jonathan Burkardt
2
#1
Can Uzun
0
#2
Nnamdi Collins
0
#3
Fares Chaibi
0
#4
Oscar Hojlund
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Can Uzun
0
#2
Nnamdi Collins
0
#3
Fares Chaibi
0
#4
Oscar Hojlund
0
#5
Jean-Matteo Bahoya
0
#6
Ansgar Knauff
0
#7
Aurelio Buta
0
#8
Kaua Santos
0
#9
Aurele Amenda
0
#10
Jessic Ngankam
0
#11
Elias Baum
0
#12
Younes Ebnoutalib
0
#13
Ayoube Amaimouni-Echghouyab
0
#14
Arnaud Kalimuendo
4
#15
Jonathan Burkardt
4
#16
Michael Zetterer
5
#17
Elye Wahi
5
#18
Michy Batshuayi
6
#19
Rasmus Kristensen
7
#20
Mahmoud Dahoud
7
#21
Mario Gotze
7
#22
Ellyes Skhiri
7
#23
Robin Koch
8
#24
Ritsu Doan
8
#25
Arthur Theate
10
#26
Hugo Larsson
14
#27
Nathaniel Brown
33
#1
Can Uzun
0
#2
Nnamdi Collins
0
#3
Fares Chaibi
0
#4
Oscar Hojlund
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Can Uzun
0
#2
Nnamdi Collins
0
#3
Fares Chaibi
0
#4
Oscar Hojlund
0
#5
Jean-Matteo Bahoya
0
#6
Ansgar Knauff
0
#7
Aurelio Buta
0
#8
Kaua Santos
0
#9
Aurele Amenda
0
#10
Jessic Ngankam
0
#11
Elias Baum
0
#12
Younes Ebnoutalib
0
#13
Ayoube Amaimouni-Echghouyab
0
#14
Michy Batshuayi
2
#15
Elye Wahi
3
#16
Jonathan Burkardt
3
#17
Michael Zetterer
3
#18
Arnaud Kalimuendo
4
#19
Mahmoud Dahoud
9
#20
Mario Gotze
9
#21
Robin Koch
10
#22
Ellyes Skhiri
12
#23
Ritsu Doan
21
#24
Hugo Larsson
28
#25
Arthur Theate
33
#26
Rasmus Kristensen
35
#27
Nathaniel Brown
74
#1
Nathaniel Brown
1.32
#2
Jonathan Burkardt
1.13
#3
Ritsu Doan
0.45
#4
Michy Batshuayi
0.43
No.
Player
Value
#1
Nathaniel Brown
1
#2
Jonathan Burkardt
1
#3
Ritsu Doan
0
#4
Michy Batshuayi
0
#5
Arnaud Kalimuendo
0
#6
Hugo Larsson
0
#7
Elye Wahi
0
#8
Robin Koch
0
#9
Mahmoud Dahoud
0
#10
Rasmus Kristensen
0
#11
Arthur Theate
0
#12
Ellyes Skhiri
0
#13
Mario Gotze
0
#14
Can Uzun
0
#15
Nnamdi Collins
0
#16
Fares Chaibi
0
#17
Oscar Hojlund
0
#18
Michael Zetterer
0
#19
Jean-Matteo Bahoya
0
#20
Ansgar Knauff
0
#21
Aurelio Buta
0
#22
Kaua Santos
0
#23
Aurele Amenda
0
#24
Jessic Ngankam
0
#25
Elias Baum
0
#26
Younes Ebnoutalib
0
#27
Ayoube Amaimouni-Echghouyab
0
Salary Stats
#1
Mio Backhaus
0
#2
Keke Topp
0
#3
Leonardo Bittencourt
0
#4
Niklas Stark
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Mio Backhaus
0
#2
Keke Topp
0
#3
Leonardo Bittencourt
0
#4
Niklas Stark
0
#5
Karim Coulibaly
0
#6
Patrice Covic
0
#7
Felix Agu
0
#8
Isak Hansen-Aaroen
0
#9
Senne Lynen
0
#10
Marco Grull
0
#11
Julian Malatini
0
#12
Skelly Alvero
0
#13
Yukinari Sugawara
0
#14
Isaac Schmidt
0
#15
Jens Stage
0
#16
Cameron Puertas
0
#17
Victor Boniface
0
#18
Karl Hein
0
#19
Amos Pieper
0
#20
Jovan Milosevic
0
#21
Olivier Deman
0
#22
Marco Friedl
0
#23
Samuel Mbangula
1
#24
Romano Schmid
2
#25
Justin Njinmah
3
#1
Mio Backhaus
0
#2
Keke Topp
0
#3
Karim Coulibaly
0
#4
Patrice Covic
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Mio Backhaus
0
#2
Keke Topp
0
#3
Karim Coulibaly
0
#4
Patrice Covic
0
#5
Isak Hansen-Aaroen
0
#6
Marco Grull
0
#7
Julian Malatini
0
#8
Skelly Alvero
0
#9
Isaac Schmidt
0
#10
Jens Stage
0
#11
Cameron Puertas
0
#12
Karl Hein
0
#13
Jovan Milosevic
0
#14
Olivier Deman
0
#15
Niklas Stark
5
#16
Leonardo Bittencourt
8
#17
Felix Agu
8
#18
Victor Boniface
8
#19
Marco Friedl
11
#20
Senne Lynen
13
#21
Yukinari Sugawara
14
#22
Samuel Mbangula
16
#23
Amos Pieper
17
#24
Romano Schmid
28
#25
Justin Njinmah
31
#1
Mio Backhaus
0
#2
Keke Topp
0
#3
Karim Coulibaly
0
#4
Patrice Covic
0
No.
Player
Value
#1
Mio Backhaus
0
#2
Keke Topp
0
#3
Karim Coulibaly
0
#4
Patrice Covic
0
#5
Isak Hansen-Aaroen
0
#6
Marco Grull
0
#7
Julian Malatini
0
#8
Skelly Alvero
0
#9
Isaac Schmidt
0
#10
Jens Stage
0
#11
Cameron Puertas
0
#12
Karl Hein
0
#13
Jovan Milosevic
0
#14
Olivier Deman
0
#15
Niklas Stark
2
#16
Leonardo Bittencourt
6
#17
Victor Boniface
8
#18
Felix Agu
15
#19
Samuel Mbangula
22
#20
Marco Friedl
26
#21
Justin Njinmah
27
#22
Senne Lynen
33
#23
Amos Pieper
33
#24
Yukinari Sugawara
61
#25
Romano Schmid
120
#1
Justin Njinmah
3.54
#2
Romano Schmid
3.36
#3
Victor Boniface
0.64
#4
Yukinari Sugawara
0.5
No.
Player
Value
#1
Justin Njinmah
4
#2
Romano Schmid
3
#3
Victor Boniface
1
#4
Yukinari Sugawara
1
#5
Samuel Mbangula
0
#6
Amos Pieper
0
#7
Senne Lynen
0
#8
Marco Friedl
0
#9
Niklas Stark
0
#10
Leonardo Bittencourt
0
#11
Felix Agu
0
#12
Mio Backhaus
0
#13
Keke Topp
0
#14
Karim Coulibaly
0
#15
Patrice Covic
0
#16
Isak Hansen-Aaroen
0
#17
Marco Grull
0
#18
Julian Malatini
0
#19
Skelly Alvero
0
#20
Isaac Schmidt
0
#21
Jens Stage
0
#22
Cameron Puertas
0
#23
Karl Hein
0
#24
Jovan Milosevic
0
#25
Olivier Deman
0
Eintracht Frankfurt: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Eintracht Frankfurt consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#2
Eintracht Frankfurt
1004
#3
FC St. Pauli
979
#4
RB Leipzig
887
#5
Borussia Dortmund
839
Average Stats
These stats show Eintracht Frankfurt`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
Weak Stats
These are the areas where Eintracht Frankfurt`s performance falls below the league average.
Werder Bremen: Where Do They Rank? A Breakdown of Their Benchmark, Average, and Weak Stats
Benchmark Stats
These are the stats where Werder Bremen is among the very best, setting the standard for the league.
Very Good Stats
These are the areas where Werder Bremen consistently performs at a high level, placing him near the top of the league.
#2
Werder Bremen
518
#3
RB Leipzig
508
#4
Borussia Monchengladbach
501
#5
TSG 1899 Hoffenheim
499
Average Stats
These stats show Werder Bremen`s solid, reliable contributions that are in line with the majority of players in his position.
#9
Werder Bremen
1512
#10
Borussia Monchengladbach
1428
#11
VfL Wolfsburg
1421
#12
FSV Mainz 05
1350
Performance per season
Expected Threat & Involvement Analysis
Eintracht Frankfurt has an Expected Threat of 4787.39 - ranking 6 and measuring their ability to advance the ball into dangerous positions, while Werder Bremen generates 4544.87 Expected Threat - sitting at 7, showing which team better progresses play toward scoring opportunities and controls the attacking tempo. See Full Expected Threat Ranking
Eintracht Frankfurt has an Expected Threat against of 373.64 - placing them 15 defensively, indicating how much dangerous ball progression they allow opponents, while Werder Bremen concedes 426.07 Expected Threat against - ranking 9, revealing which defense better restricts opponent advances into threatening areas and maintains defensive solidity. See Full Expected Threat against Ranking
Eintracht Frankfurt recorded 185 Critical ball losses - ranking 15 in possession security, meaning they've given the ball away in trouble spots, while Werder Bremen suffered 222 such losses - sitting at 18, highlighting which team is more vulnerable in possession under pressure and prone to dangerous turnovers. See Full Critical ball losses Ranking
Key Preformance Indicators
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected Threat ⓘ Expected Threat (xT) measures how much a team’s chance of scoring changes when the ball is moved from one location on the pitch to another. The pitch is divided into zones, each with a value reflecting the probability of scoring if the ball is in that zone. Every on-ball action (pass, carry, dribble, sometimes reception) gets a value equal to the increase (or decrease) in the team’s scoring probability when the ball moves from the start zone to the end zone. Summing these changes across a match or season gives a player’s or team’s total xT contributed by their actions. | 4787.39 4544.87 |
| Expected Threat Against ⓘ Expected Threat Against (often written xTA or xT against) applies the same idea from the defensive point of view. It measures how much the opponent’s chance of scoring changes during their possessions against your team. When the opposition progresses the ball into more dangerous zones, the xTA you concede increases; when you prevent progression or force the ball back into safer areas, you reduce xTA conceded. Aggregated over time, xTA describes how much threat a team allows through opponent ball progression, and at player level it can be used to evaluate how well defenders and midfielders limit dangerous ball movement. | 373.64 426.07 |
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 185 222 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1179 1039 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.68 1.11 |
Ratings and Scores
Compare Eintracht Frankfurt & Werder Bremen`s Performance
Performance Trends
Select a trend category to explore metrics with significant changes, stable performance, or areas of concern.
Shooting Data & xG Analysis
Advanced Stats & Analytics
Scores
| 1vs1 Index ⓘ To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are a few example: succesful passes, ball losses, goals, assists, expected goals, critical ball losses, initiating dangerous attacks, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, | 61.87 55.6 |
| 1vs1 index defensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance offensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 11 values. | 53.7 54.28 |
| 1vs1 Index offensive ⓘ The 1vs1 Performance defensive Index is a sophisticated algorithm designed to assess the performance of individual players, comprising a set of 10 values. To enhance your comprehension of our performance index, we will elucidate some of its values. However, it's important to note that we cannot disclose all of them. Here are few examples: critical ball losses, clearances, ball regains in different parts of the pitch, etc | 70.07 59 |
| Offensive interventions | 141 141.35 |
Goals & Assists
| Goals | 40 22 |
| Assists ⓘ Creating goals, playing the final pass. | 33 21 |
| Goals by long distance shot ⓘ Goal after a shot from more than 22 metres | 3 0 |
| Goals by head ⓘ Goals by head | 6 3 |
| Penalty goals ⓘ Penalty goals | 3 2 |
| Goals by freekick ⓘ Goals by freekick | 0 0 |
| Goals by foot | 31 17 |
| Shots on Goal | 159 181 |
| Shots on goal / Goal Ratio ⓘ Describes the ratio of shots on goal and the number of goals. The ideal value would be 100% - every shot is a goal. | 13.29 6.3 |
Goals & Shots conceded
| Goals conceeded | 44 37 |
| Goals by head conceeded | 9 4 |
| Goals by foot conceeded | 30 30 |
| Shots on goal conceeded | 163 196 |
| Goals per 90 min conceeded | 2.2 1.85 |
Passing and Ball progression
| Progressive passes (PrgP) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions by a player or a team (dribblings, passes, crosses) | 3607 3545 |
| Progressive passes received (PrgR) ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver (dribblings, passes, crosses) and opponent players have been bypassed | 2902 2884 |
| Total successful passes by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 6700 6438 |
| Total successful passes by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 113 148 |
| Total successful passes by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 167 179 |
| Total successful passes by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 305 346 |
| Total successful passes by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 26 34 |
| Total successful passes from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 715 818 |
| Total successful passes from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 1789 1886 |
| Total successful passes from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 4325 4124 |
| Total successful passes from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 1466 1384 |
| Total successful passes from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 77 92 |
| Total successful passes from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 2054 1634 |
| Total successful passes from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 1451 1323 |
| Total successful passes from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 2112 2284 |
| Total successful passes from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 1323 1338 |
| Total successful passes from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 1432 1725 |
| Initiate dangerous attacks ⓘ Initiating dangerous attacks with the ball, play in advanced areas, penetrating the opposition defence. A deadly pass from a midfield to a the striker, who is then free in front of the goal, bypasses a certain amount of defenders. 78% of the teams with a better result in this metric won their games. | 1179 1039 |
| Succesful passes in % by low pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a diagonal pass. | 90.85 90.59 |
| Succesful passes in % by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case a diagonal pass. | 59.47 61.16 |
| Succesful passes in % by throw-ins ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a throw in. | 84.25 92.51 |
| Succesful passes in % by corners ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. In this case after a corner. | 41.27 52.31 |
| Succesful passes in % by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. in this case a low pass. In this case a clearance. | 40.44 43.13 |
| Succesful passes in % from own box ⓘ Pass that reaches the team-mate. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘own box’ to another area of the field. | 68.88 72.07 |
| Succesful passes in % from 1st third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the area ‘1st third of the field’ to another area of the field. | 78.19 78.19 |
| Succesful passes in % from 2nd third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘middle third’ area to another area of the field. | 84.34 83.97 |
| Succesful passes in % from final third ⓘ Pass that reaches the other player. Here specifically: A pass FROM the ‘last third’ area to another area of the field. | 74.08 75.01 |
| Succesful passes in % from opponents box ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 44.51 51.69 |
| Succesful passes in % from left wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left half space | 77.03 78.37 |
| Succesful passes in % from left half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the left wing. | 81.42 79.88 |
| Succesful passes in % from centre ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here from the center. | 80.37 80.71 |
| Succesful passes in % from right half space ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. | 79.2 80.62 |
| Succesful passes in % from right wing ⓘ Pass that reaches the teammate. Here played FROM right half space | 77.16 76.57 |
Ball contacts & phases of play
| Offensive touches in phase Ball possession ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase of ball possession of own team. | 6175 5917 |
| Offensive touches in phase Attacking Transition ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "attacking transition". | 1503 1659 |
| Offensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the opponents box. | 402 456 |
| Offensive touches in phase Second Balls ⓘ Any touch on the ball where a teammate has previously been on the ball is called an offensive touch. In this case in the phase "second ball" | 794 771 |
| Defensive touches in phase Out of Possession ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 957 930 |
| Defensive touches in phase Defensive Transition ⓘ Ball contacts in defensive play (when opposition team has been in possession). | 766 826 |
| Defensive touches in phase Set Pieces ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. Hier nach einer Standard Aktion. | 475 529 |
| Defensive touches in phase Second ball ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case after a "second ball". | 648 562 |
| Total touches in phase Set Pieces | 877 985 |
| Total touches in phase Second ball | 1442 1333 |
Ball losses
| Critical ball losses ⓘ Number of turnovers in possession in which 4 or more teammates are removed from the game (not goal side of the ball). These ball losses are particularly serious because there are few teammates behind the ball, therefore increasing the risk of conceding a goal. | 185 222 |
| Ball losses by low passes ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by low pass | 675 669 |
| Ball losses by diagonal pass ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by diagonal pass. | 77 94 |
| Ball losses by clearance by foot ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by clearance. | 246 236 |
| Ball losses by headers ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by headers. | 419 376 |
| Ball losses by throw-in ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here after a throw in. | 57 28 |
| Ball losses by corners ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent or out of play. Here by corners | 37 31 |
| Ball losses in own box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘own penalty area’ | 323 317 |
| Ball losses in first third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘first third of the pitch’ area | 499 526 |
| Ball losses in second third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the ‘centre third of the pitch’ area | 803 787 |
| Ball losses in final third ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the space ‘last third of the pitch’ | 513 461 |
| Ball losses in opponent box ⓘ Pass that goes to the opponent. Here specifically: the pass that is intercepted was played FROM the area ‘opponent's box’ | 96 86 |
| Ball losses total | 2234 2177 |
Ball regains
| Ball regains total ⓘ Number of offensive captures of the ball. Conquering the ball after the opponent's pass. | 2820 2827 |
| Ball regains in own box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here own box | 185 227 |
| Ball regains frist third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: From which area was the pass played, which was then intercepted -> here frist third of pitch | 652 755 |
| Ball regains second third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here middle third | 1079 1033 |
| Ball regains in final third of pitch ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here last third | 411 370 |
| Ball regains in opponents box ⓘ Number of offensive ball recoveries. Here specifically: IN which area was the pass intercepted that was played by the opponent -> here the opponent's box | 73 57 |
Defensive
| Ground duels won ⓘ Won ground duel. | 623 640 |
| Ground duels lost ⓘ Lost ground duel. | 653 670 |
| Ariel duels won ⓘ Won aerial duel. | 220 212 |
| Ariel duels lost ⓘ Lost aerial duel. | 291 208 |
| Interception ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case an interception. | 600 644 |
| Ground duel ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a ground duel. | 302 306 |
| Header defensive ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a defensive header. | 613 610 |
| Block ⓘ Any touch on the ball where an opposition player has previously been on the ball is called a defensive touch. In this case a blocked ball. | 356 351 |
| Tackles | 1276 1310 |
| Clearances by foot | 459 454 |
| Ground duels total | 1276 1310 |
| Ground duels won % | 48.82 48.85 |
| Ground duels lost % | 51.18 51.15 |
| Ariel duels total | 511 420 |
| Ariel duels won % | 43.05 50.48 |
| Ariel duels lost % | 56.95 49.52 |
| Defensive stability ⓘ The ability to defend well | 409.7 419.4 |
Dribbles
| Progressive carries (PrgC) ⓘ Number of successful offensive dribblings with bypassed opponents by a player or a team | 506 528 |
| Succesful dribbles | 6913 6878 |
Elimination actions & Pitch
| Number of offensive actions from own box ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from their own box. | 361 390 |
| Number of offensive actions from 1st part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the first third. | 797 921 |
| Number of offensive actions from 2nd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed FROM the middle third | 1562 1512 |
| Number of offensive actions from 3rd part of pitch ⓘ The number of opponents a player or team has outplayed from the final third | 650 554 |
| Number of offensive actions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> 1st third of the pitch | 542 620 |
| Number of offensive actions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> middle third of the pitch | 1621 1659 |
| Number of offensive actions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> final third of the pitch | 923 800 |
| Number of offensive actions into the opponent's box ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically IN which space this pass or dribble was played -> into the box | 256 239 |
| Number of offensive actions from the right wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right wing side of the pitch | 1004 835 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-right ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> right half space of the pitch | 533 486 |
| Number of offensive actions from the centre ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> center lane of the pitch | 749 805 |
| Number of offensive actions from half-left ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left half space of the pitch | 515 519 |
| Number of offensive actions from the left wing ⓘ Number of actions with which opponents could be bypassed (dribbling, passing, crossing, standard). Here specifically OUT of which space this pass or dribble was played -> left wing of the pitch | 622 776 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 1st part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the first third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 467 518 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 2nd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the middle third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 1423 1426 |
| Number of offensive receptions in 3rd part of pitch ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the last third of the pitch and opponent players have been bypassed | 745 659 |
| Number of offensive receptions in opponent's box ⓘ Number of successful offensive actions in which a player is found as a receiver in the opponents box and opponent players have been bypassed | 209 204 |
xG
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 27.34 24.32 |
| Xg total ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. At player and team level, the shot-based xG indicate how many goals would have been statistically expected for the player or team on the basis of the goals scored. The comparison with the goals actually scored allows a statement to be made about the finishing efficiency. The same statement can be made about the defence by comparing the opponent's xG with the goals conceded. | 27.34 24.32 |
| Xg long distance ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a long range shot (more than 22 Meters) | 1.32 1.66 |
| Xg with head ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a header. | 3.53 3.77 |
| Xg with penalites ⓘ Shot-based xG tell how high the scoring probability of a goal shot is, taking into account many parameters. Here based on a penalty | 2.34 2.34 |
| Xg Ratio ⓘ The ratio of the Xg value in relation to the goals scored. The lower the value, the better the goalscorer. | 0.68 1.11 |
| Open play Xg ⓘ Open play Xg value | 24.52 21.32 |
| Set piece Xg ⓘ Set piece Xg | 2.82 3 |
| Xg average per shot ⓘ Xg average per shot | 0.12 0.09 |
| Xg with foot ⓘ Xg with foot | 20.98 17.56 |
| xG over/under ⓘ Goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 12.66 -2.32 |
| Goals minus Xg header ⓘ Header goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 2.47 -0.77 |
| Non-penalty xG (npxG) ⓘ Penalty goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 25 21.98 |
| Goals minus Xg free-kick ⓘ Free kick goals minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | -0.49 -0.66 |
| Goals minus Xg long distance shot ⓘ Long distance goals (more than 22 meters) minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 1.68 -1.66 |
| Goals minus Xg short distance shot ⓘ Short distance goals (less than 10 meters)minus Xg value. The higher the value, the better. If the value is high, the player has scored many goals from chances with a low Xg. A negative value indicates that the player is a not good a scoring goals. | 1.5 3.8 |
Comments (0)