Clermont Foot 63 vs RB Leipzig - who is the better team?

Currently RB Leipzig has a better 1vs1 performance index with 91. Clermont Foot 63 has 27 goals and RB Leipzig has a total of 49 goals. Our opinion is that currently RB Leipzig would win the match.

• At the moment Clermont Foot 63 has the better defense. Through the entire team they have a total of 1296 interceptions and 59 blocks.
• In Clermont Foot 63 the two top defensive players are Mateusz Wieteska and Neto Borges Borges dos Santos Neto.
• In RB Leipzig the two top defenders are Willi Orban and Josko Gvardiol.
• Based on this statistics we believe that Clermont Foot 63 has currently the best defense.

Evaluating the strength of a teams midfield is not easy. At 1vs1 we look at a value called Pass Progression Value (PPV). We measure the ability of players to play the pass into dangerous zones and to create chances. RB Leipzig has a PPV value of 0.23 and Clermont Foot 63 has a value of 0.2. Within the team of RB Leipzig Dani Olmo has a total value of 0.65 and in the team of Clermont Foot 63 the best player is Neto Borges Borges dos Santos Neto.

• To analyse the best strikers of teams we look at the amount of goals, shots on goal and an interesting metric called expected goal value (Xg value – measure who the probability of a chance to turn into a goal.)
• Clermont Foot 63 has scored in this season so far 27 goals and 105 shots on goal. RB Leipzig scored 49 and 145 shots on goal.
• The two best players of Clermont Foot 63 are Komnen Andric with 4 goals and Muhammed Cham Muhammed Cham with 4 goals. Their expected goal value per 90 minutes is 5.23 and 3.75.
• The two best players of RB Leipzig are Christopher Nkunku with 12 goals and Timo Werner with 7 goals. Their expected goal value per 90 minutes is 9.14 and 5.98.
• Our opinion is that RB Leipzig has the better offensive players than Clermont Foot 63.

Based on all statistical information we believe that currently RB Leipzig is the better team. Please feel free to discuss with us – the comment box is below. We will be happy to reply.