% | Per 90 | Metric | Per 90 | % | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
45.92%
|
1.36 | Expected Goals (xG) | 1.26 |
33.67%
|
||||||
34.69%
|
49 | Challenges won, % | 51 |
76.53%
|
||||||
22.45%
|
17.15 | Team pressing | 18.11 |
58.16%
|
||||||
68.37%
|
51 | Ball possessions, % | 48 |
38.78%
|
||||||
52.04%
|
18.71 | Passes average length | 18.09 |
56.12%
|
Tyrone Mings
Is Aston Villa better than Clermont Foot 63?
Currently Aston Villa has a better 1vs1 performance index with 90. Aston Villa has 35 goals and Clermont Foot 63 has a total of 27 goals. Our opinion is that currently Aston Villa would win the match.
Aston Villa vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better defense?
Aston Villa vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better midfield?
Evaluating the strength of a teams midfield is not easy. At 1vs1 we look at a value called Pass Progression Value (PPV). We measure the ability of players to play the pass into dangerous zones and to create chances. Aston Villa has a PPV value of 0.23 and Clermont Foot 63 has a value of 0.2. Within the team of Aston Villa Ashley Young has a total value of 0.48 and in the team of Clermont Foot 63 the best player is Neto Borges Borges dos Santos Neto.
Aston Villa vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better attackers?
Summary
Based on all statistical information we believe that currently Aston Villa is the better team. Please feel free to discuss with us – the comment box is below. We will be happy to reply.