% | Per 90 | Metric | Per 90 | % | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20.41%
|
1.13 | Expected Goals (xG) | 1.26 |
33.67%
|
||||||
32.65%
|
49 | Challenges won, % | 51 |
76.53%
|
||||||
96.94%
|
22.71 | Team pressing | 18.11 |
58.16%
|
||||||
20.41%
|
45 | Ball possessions, % | 48 |
38.78%
|
||||||
75.51%
|
18.54 | Passes average length | 18.09 |
56.12%
|
Clermont Foot 63 has a small advantage – but a very close match lies ahead. Nevertheless our prediction is that Clermont Foot 63 will win.
Neto Borges Borges dos Santos Neto
Is Ajaccio better than Clermont Foot 63?
Currently Clermont Foot 63 has a better 1vs1 performance index with 83. Ajaccio has 20 goals and Clermont Foot 63 has a total of 27 goals. Our opinion is that currently Clermont Foot 63 would win the match.
Ajaccio vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better defense?
Ajaccio vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better midfield?
Evaluating the strength of a teams midfield is not easy. At 1vs1 we look at a value called Pass Progression Value (PPV). We measure the ability of players to play the pass into dangerous zones and to create chances. Ajaccio has a PPV value of 0.32 and Clermont Foot 63 has a value of 0.2. Within the team of Ajaccio Mohamed Baki Baki Youssouf has a total value of 0.76 and in the team of Clermont Foot 63 the best player is Neto Borges Borges dos Santos Neto.
Ajaccio vs Clermont Foot 63 - who has the better attackers?
Summary
Based on all statistical information we believe that currently Clermont Foot 63 is the better team. Please feel free to discuss with us – the comment box is below. We will be happy to reply.